logo
Article

Developer sues over Pinnacle Wind turbine project

West Virginia Record|Whitney Brakken|November 7, 2013
West VirginiaLegal

MARTINSBURG – A residential property developer is claiming damages after wind turbines were placed near his desired property development.

Mike Haywood, individually, and Mike Haywood doing business as The Mike Haywood Group filed a lawsuit Oct. 28 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia at Martinsburg against Pinnacle Wind LLC, formerly Pinnacle Wind Force LLC, wholly owned by direct intermediate subsidiary and affiliate of Southern California Edison Mission, namely Mission Wind Pinnacle Inc., which Southern California Edison Mission is in turn a wholly owned and largest subsidiary of Edison International.

The plaintiff says the defendants placed 23 wind turbines near Keyser, which is approximately 1 1/2 miles …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

MARTINSBURG – A residential property developer is claiming damages after wind turbines were placed near his desired property development.

Mike Haywood, individually, and Mike Haywood doing business as The Mike Haywood Group filed a lawsuit Oct. 28 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia at Martinsburg against Pinnacle Wind LLC, formerly Pinnacle Wind Force LLC, wholly owned by direct intermediate subsidiary and affiliate of Southern California Edison Mission, namely Mission Wind Pinnacle Inc., which Southern California Edison Mission is in turn a wholly owned and largest subsidiary of Edison International.

The plaintiff says the defendants placed 23 wind turbines near Keyser, which is approximately 1 1/2 miles from his residential housing project.

In November or December 2011, the turbines produced noises and pulsations disturbing the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s potential buyers, according to the complaint.

The complaint further states the noises and pulsations from the turbines cause annoyance and core pulsations that cannot be escaped without leaving the property. The wind turbines had never been used around homes and it was reckless for the defendants to place them near the plaintiff’s residential development, according to the complaint.

The plaintiffs are seeking a permanent injunction, compensatory damages and costs. Charleston attorney Henry E. Wood III of Wood Law Office LLC is representing the plaintiffs.

United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia at Martinsburg Case No. 3:13-cv-155


Source:http://wvrecord.com/news/2639…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION