logo
Article

Turbine project could move to Supreme Court; Ruling allows Champaign wind farm to move ahead

Matt Sanctis|Matt Sanctis|Oct 1, 2013
OhioLegal

Union Neighbors United, a group of residents opposed to the project, will have to evaluate the case further and decide on the best option, said Chris Walker, an attorney for the group. Robert McConnell, a member of UNU, said he wants to take the fight as far as it can go. “We’re in it for the long haul, and the next step is the Supreme Court, and that’s where we’ll be going,” McConnell said.


COLUMBUS — A legal dispute over a proposed wind farm in Champaign County could be on its way to the Ohio Supreme Court, after members of the Ohio Power Siting Board rejected a request to reconsider their initial decision that allowed the project to move forward.

The board’s decision Monday means the state’s highest court is the last available option for opponents of the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project. Those opponents have raised concerns ranging from the noise the wind turbines might produce to the distance from homes within the project area. Combined with a first phase of the project, the wind farm would include about 100 turbines across six townships in Champaign County.

Supporters of the project have argued it will bring …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

COLUMBUS — A legal dispute over a proposed wind farm in Champaign County could be on its way to the Ohio Supreme Court, after members of the Ohio Power Siting Board rejected a request to reconsider their initial decision that allowed the project to move forward.

The board’s decision Monday means the state’s highest court is the last available option for opponents of the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project. Those opponents have raised concerns ranging from the noise the wind turbines might produce to the distance from homes within the project area. Combined with a first phase of the project, the wind farm would include about 100 turbines across six townships in Champaign County.

Supporters of the project have argued it will bring jobs and could mean as much as $55 million to the region’s economy.

Union Neighbors United, a group of residents opposed to the project, will have to evaluate the case further and decide on the best option, said Chris Walker, an attorney for the group.

“At this point, we’re considering what our next steps are,” Walker said.

But Robert McConnell, a member of UNU, said he wants to take the fight as far as it can go.

“We’re in it for the long haul, and the next step is the Supreme Court, and that’s where we’ll be going,” McConnell said.

For the wind farm, the siting board’s decision means the project can move forward as planned, said Jason Dagger, a spokesman for the project. He said the company is willing to work with residents, as well as city and county officials.

In the meantime, Everpower Renewables, the company in charge of the project, is still working with engineers to work out technical details for the project. The company has not decided what type of turbine will be used in the project. A decision could be made by the end of the year, but Dagger said it’s still too early to set a definite timeline.

“There’s still a lot of things that need to be worked out throughout the project yet,” Dagger said. “We’re not going to start construction tomorrow.”

Dagger also said the company has not approached the Champaign County commissioners regarding a Payment In Lieu of Taxes, or PILOT agreement. If approved by the commissioners, it would mean the company would pay between $1.2 and $1.8 million annually that would be spread between numerous entities, including schools, libraries, townships and other organizations. Developers have previously said it would not be cost-effective if the wind farm were taxed like a traditional utility.

“We look forward to having those discussions with the commissioners in the near future,” Dagger said of seeking the PILOT agreement.

McConnell said he wasn’t surprised with the decision by the OPSB, but added he believes there are problems with the project that need to be addressed.

“It’s not something that’s here today and gone tomorrow,” he said of the wind farm.


Source:http://www.springfieldnewssun…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2026 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION