logo
Article

Board delays conservation easements for wind project

VT Public Radio|John Dillon |July 15, 2011
VermontGeneral

The company will be allowed to start construction next month on Lowell without first having conservation easements in place to protect wildlife habitat. The Public Service Board originally said the conservation easements had to be secured prior to August 1st.


(Host) Green Mountain Power got a final ruling today on its proposed Lowell Mountain wind energy project.

The company will be allowed to start construction next month on Lowell without first having conservation easements in place to protect wildlife habitat.

The Public Service Board originally said the conservation easements had to be secured prior to August 1st. The board has now extended that deadline to the end of the year.

Dorothy Schnure is a GMP spokeswoman.

(Schnure) "I think that makes it very practical, doable for us to accomplish what we need to accomplish with those easements. So I think that seems like a reasonable term."

(Host) But the towns of Albany and Craftsbury argued that the wildlife habitat should be …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

(Host) Green Mountain Power got a final ruling today on its proposed Lowell Mountain wind energy project.

The company will be allowed to start construction next month on Lowell without first having conservation easements in place to protect wildlife habitat.

The Public Service Board originally said the conservation easements had to be secured prior to August 1st. The board has now extended that deadline to the end of the year.

Dorothy Schnure is a GMP spokeswoman.

(Schnure) "I think that makes it very practical, doable for us to accomplish what we need to accomplish with those easements. So I think that seems like a reasonable term."

(Host) But the towns of Albany and Craftsbury argued that the wildlife habitat should be protected before GMP breaks ground. Jared Margolis is the towns' lawyer. He says the board acknowledged in its order that the construction would have an impact on wildlife.

(Margolis) "We're disappointed that the board has allowed them to create the fragmentation that they've identified as such a problem and a potential undue adverse impact on the environment prior to any mitigation being in place. We think it's a bad decision for the environment."

(Host) The board also ruled that if GMP does not have the easements in place by the end of the year, it will have to halt work on the project.

GMP wants to put 21 turbines on Lowell Mountain to generate 63 megawatts of wind power.


Source:http://www.vpr.net/news_detai…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION