Documents
A report by Salford University commissioned by BERR concluded that "the incidence of AM and the number of people affected is probably too small at present to make a compelling case for further research funding in preference to other types of noise which affect many more people." Consequently BERR decided not to fund further research. However, the opinion of the Noise Working Group that advised BERR (then the DTI) was that, although the incidence was small it might become greater with larger turbines and "a greater understanding of the effects and causes relating to AM [is] required to ensure that this phenomenon can be managed." Specifically the first stage objective was to "Identify up to 10 potential sites which could be used to carry out objective noise measurements" . The government decided not to accept the groups advice.
This paper does not pretend to present any substantial new evidence but I have tried to review the current situation in order to provide some direction for future work.
Where "upwind" and "downwind" are insufficient descriptions, references to observer positions in this paper are made by compass bearings on the assumption that the wind direction is from the North. The turbine is assumed to rotate clockwise as viewed from upwind. The phrase "axis of the turbine" in this context means on the north-south line passing through the centre of the turbine.
| < prev | next > |



