logo
Article

Ørsted accuses BP of hampering 2.6GW Hornsea Four offshore wind farm

Windpower Monthly|Craig Richard|March 11, 2022
United Kingdom (UK)General

In a submission to the UK Government's Planning Inspectorate, BP claimed the wind farm has fewer geological constraints than its planned CO2 storage project and said its scheme needs a “reasonable and practicable degree of separation from Hornsea Four”. This would allow workers to access relief wells and rigs, and allow crew changes on drilling vessels for search and rescue operations, BP explained.


Both companies are attempting to find a solution for their neighbouring projects as Planning Inspectorate weighs evidence

Ørsted has accused BP of trying to block development of up to a quarter of its planned Hornsea Project Four off the east coast of England. 

Both companies have secured rights to an area of seabed off the Yorkshire coast.

Ørsted complained that the oil and gas giant is trying to prevent wind farm development in an area of seabed overlapping the Danish developer’s planned wind farm and BP’s planned carbon dioxide storage project. The Danish developer intends to build a wind farm with a capacity of around 2.6GW using about 180 turbines.

In a submission to the UK Government's Planning Inspectorate, BP claimed the wind farm …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

Both companies are attempting to find a solution for their neighbouring projects as Planning Inspectorate weighs evidence

Ørsted has accused BP of trying to block development of up to a quarter of its planned Hornsea Project Four off the east coast of England. 

Both companies have secured rights to an area of seabed off the Yorkshire coast.

Ørsted complained that the oil and gas giant is trying to prevent wind farm development in an area of seabed overlapping the Danish developer’s planned wind farm and BP’s planned carbon dioxide storage project. The Danish developer intends to build a wind farm with a capacity of around 2.6GW using about 180 turbines.

In a submission to the UK Government's Planning Inspectorate, BP claimed the wind farm has fewer geological constraints than its planned CO2 storage project and said its scheme needs a “reasonable and practicable degree of separation from Hornsea Four”. This would allow workers to access relief wells and rigs, and allow crew changes on drilling vessels for search and rescue operations, BP explained.

But Ørsted countered that the overlapping area of seabed represents approximately 25% of the developable area for its planned wind farm and that failing to develop it could amount to a loss of up to 675MW of capacity. Meanwhile, increasing the density of turbines in the remaining seabed lease could reduce annual energy production by 2.5%, Ørsted claimed.

In its own submission to the Planning Inspectorate, Ørsted's said: “This would make the project far less commercially competitive and potentially result in Hornsea Four being unable to compete for a contract for difference.”

An Ørsted spokesperson told Windpower Monthly it had been working with BP to find a solution, and added: “The issue of co-location has been brought into sharp focus and it’s essential that a solution is found. The technology exists to allow offshore wind and carbon capture, utilisation and storage to work in harmony, but genuine collaboration is needed to safeguard future projects.

“We will continue to engage closely with all relevant stakeholders to work towards a solution.”

A Planning Inspectorate spokesman said a team of inspectors would collate the evidence submitted by the companies and make a recommendation to the secretary of state, Kwasi Kwarteng, who will make the final decision.

BP was contacted but had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.


Source:https://www.windpowermonthly.…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION