logo
Article

D-Day looms for wind farm scheme

Isle of Wight County Press|Richard Wright|October 27, 2006
United Kingdom (UK)GeneralImpact on WildlifeImpact on BatsImpact on LandscapeZoning/Planning

THE comprehensive landscape reasons for planners recommending the IW Council turn down the controversial Wellow wind farm have been unveiled to the public, ahead of Monday’s planning decision on the scheme. Consultants acting for the IW Council concluded the six turbines, two of which are nearly 110 metres tall, would have significant adverse effects on the protected landscape, nearby homes and rights of way, and insufficient consideration had been given by applicant Your Energy to mitigating adverse effects on the countryside. Insufficient information was provided on the impact of the turbines on bats.


THE comprehensive landscape reasons for planners recommending the IW Council turn down the controversial Wellow wind farm have been unveiled to the public, ahead of Monday’s planning decision on the scheme.

Consultants acting for the IW Council concluded the six turbines, two of which are nearly 110 metres tall, would have significant adverse effects on the protected landscape, nearby homes and rights of way, and insufficient consideration had been given by applicant Your Energy to mitigating adverse effects on the countryside.

Insufficient information was provided on the impact of the turbines on bats.

Your Energy’s application was submitted on May 30, three years after a Wellow scheme was first publicly mooted and six years after …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

THE comprehensive landscape reasons for planners recommending the IW Council turn down the controversial Wellow wind farm have been unveiled to the public, ahead of Monday’s planning decision on the scheme.

Consultants acting for the IW Council concluded the six turbines, two of which are nearly 110 metres tall, would have significant adverse effects on the protected landscape, nearby homes and rights of way, and insufficient consideration had been given by applicant Your Energy to mitigating adverse effects on the countryside.

Insufficient information was provided on the impact of the turbines on bats.

Your Energy’s application was submitted on May 30, three years after a Wellow scheme was first publicly mooted and six years after the site was first looked at for its wind potential.

It will be considered at a public meeting of the IW Council’s development control committee at Medina Theatre on Monday.

Planners concluded if the permission that exists for three turbines on Cheverton Down near Shorwell — but which have not yet been built — were taken into account, the cumulative impact on the Island’s landscape would also be too great.

Planners said there had been inadequate consideration of more acceptable alternative sites or designs.
Your Energy wants to build four 100-metre and two 109.5-metre turbines, from ground to blade tip, on farmland at Wellow.

All 18 blades would be manufactured by Newport firm Vestas, which wants to use the farm as a test bed and advertisement for its product.

Planners recognised the government’s planning guidance, which encouraged renewable energy, but said that was outweighed by the wind farm’s effect on the landscape. It was contrary to its local development framework and the draft South-East Plan.

ThWART spokesman Mike Hammond said: “We believe there are further, highly significant and compelling grounds on which the application should be rejected which have not been raised as reasons for refusal by the planning officer’s report.

“The impact of the proposals on wildlife, aviation safety, TV interference and noise disturbance, for example, materially strengthen the grounds for refusing this application and it is important the committee takes on board all grounds for rejecting the application.

“If the developer appeals against refusal, the council could lose the chance to argue its case on some very important issues affecting this site.”

Your Energy project director Patrick Geraets said: “We are urging councillors to be brave and for the Island to say it does want to make a real contribution to reduce carbon emissions.

“The effect on the landscape is a highly subjective reason for refusal and we have taken action to reduce both the height and number of turbines.

“Every form of energy generation has its positives and negatives, but wind power is here and we believe has fewer negatives than any other means.

“We passionately believe it is right for the Island on the right site and hope to be able to convince people and get our message across properly.”

# In-depth coverage of the wind farm debate in the Friday, October 27, County Press.

# HOMEOWNERS wishing to do their bit for the environment by installing mini-wind turbines have been warned they first need planning approval.
County Hall said the domestic turbines — currently being snapped up for just under £1,500 from B and Q — are not exempt from the need for formal consent but hinted it would look favourably on applications.

“The council will always seek to encourage initiatives that attempt to conserve energy and harness alternative sources,” County Hall said.

“The mini-wind generators available to the public for domestic use are not exempt from the need for planning permission and we would advise anyone looking to install these devices to seek advice from planning services on 823553.”

A B and Q spokesman said the mini-turbines, which could cut energy bills by up to 30 per cent, were selling well.

He said different planning authorities took different views on the need for permission.
The company was lobbying government to issue guidance exempting the equipment from the need for permission.


Source:http://www.iwcp.co.uk/ViewArt…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION