logo
Article

Maine House stalls LePage’s effort to block wind energy development

Bangor Daily News|Christopher Cousins|March 2, 2018
MaineEnergy Policy

LD 1810 would shrink the area where wind developments are eligible for Maine’s abbreviated permitting process and ramp up requirements for projects that would still qualify. Following a series of procedural motions and votes Thursday in the House of Representatives, the bill is in danger of dying because of a disagreement with the Senate over which legislative committee should handle the bill.


Gov. Paul LePage’s push to curtail expedited permitting for wind energy projects suffered a serious blow Thursday by Democrats trying to kill the governor’s bill before it can be formally introduced.

LD 1810 would shrink the area where wind developments are eligible for Maine’s abbreviated permitting process and ramp up requirements for projects that would still qualify. Following a series of procedural motions and votes Thursday in the House of Representatives, the bill is in danger of dying because of a disagreement with the Senate over which legislative committee should handle the bill.

The House favors the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee. The Senate voted earlier this week to send LePage’s bill to the Environment and …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

Gov. Paul LePage’s push to curtail expedited permitting for wind energy projects suffered a serious blow Thursday by Democrats trying to kill the governor’s bill before it can be formally introduced.

LD 1810 would shrink the area where wind developments are eligible for Maine’s abbreviated permitting process and ramp up requirements for projects that would still qualify. Following a series of procedural motions and votes Thursday in the House of Representatives, the bill is in danger of dying because of a disagreement with the Senate over which legislative committee should handle the bill.

The House favors the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee. The Senate voted earlier this week to send LePage’s bill to the Environment and Natural Resources Committee. The conflict centers on a procedural maneuver deep in the weeds of a bill’s path to enactment but could spell doom for a high-profile LePage initiative.

House Minority Leader Ken Fredette, R-Newport, who led the effort to have the House agree with the Senate and move the bill forward, said during debate Thursday that the House’s action would likely kill the bill.

A spokeswoman for Senate Republicans said they haven’t discussed the issue during a caucus so she couldn’t predict how future votes will go. Sen. Tom Saviello, R-Wilton, who moved in the Senate to send the bill to the Environmental and Natural Resources Committee, which he chairs, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

In January, the governor generated controversy when he issued an executive order placing a moratorium on permits for new commercial wind turbines in Maine and called for the creation of a commission to study turbines’ impact on the environment, property values and tourism. The bill debated Thursday in the House is a follow-on to that order. It would reduce the expedited permitting area, which currently includes much of Aroostook, Washington, Penobscot and Somerset Counties, to only a portion of Aroostook County.

The bill would also extend the distance where a visual impact assessment is required from the current 8 miles to 40 miles. The assessment, which represents another level of approval in the process, gauges turbines’ impact on scenic areas.

Since January, two environmental groups have sued LePage, arguing that his executive order was an “unconstitutional executive overreach.” Those suits by the Maine Renewable Energy Association and the Conservation Law Foundation are still pending.

LePage spokeswoman Julie Rabinowitz said the governor’s bill “simply seeks to provide people a voice in the process.

“The Democrats once again show that they favor special interests over the citizens of Maine who have to live and work in the shadow and whose livelihoods may be adversely affected by their installation,” Rabinowitz wrote in response to questions from the Bangor Daily News.


Source:http://bangordailynews.com/20…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION