logo
Article

Months from completion, questions remain about South Terminal use

South Coast Today|Ariel Wittenberg |July 27, 2014
MassachusettsGeneral

With just five months to go before South Terminal construction is complete, questions remain unanswered about who will operate the facility and what types of cargo it might receive.


NEW BEDFORD — With just five months to go before South Terminal construction is complete, questions remain unanswered about who will operate the facility and what types of cargo it might receive.

Owned by the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, the port facility is engineered specifically to support the staging of offshore wind farms. Developers such as Deepwater Wind and Cape Wind have already expressed interest in using the facility.

State and city officials have long said that South Terminal will handle other kinds of cargo in between offshore wind projects. But the state still doesn't know how the various projects and products coming into the terminal will be coordinated.

"I think we haven't worked that all out yet," said …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

NEW BEDFORD — With just five months to go before South Terminal construction is complete, questions remain unanswered about who will operate the facility and what types of cargo it might receive.

Owned by the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, the port facility is engineered specifically to support the staging of offshore wind farms. Developers such as Deepwater Wind and Cape Wind have already expressed interest in using the facility.

State and city officials have long said that South Terminal will handle other kinds of cargo in between offshore wind projects. But the state still doesn't know how the various projects and products coming into the terminal will be coordinated.

"I think we haven't worked that all out yet," said Bill White, director of offshore wind at MassCEC.

"Part one is that this facility is built to support offshore wind," he said. "Part two is that it could also entertain other economically valuable trade, but there is still some uncertainty of what that would be."

In April, MassCEC solicited information from companies interested in operating South Terminal, asking the corporations how they would run the facilities. Five companies responded to the request: Maritime International of New Bedford, BLG Logistics of Germany, Waterson Terminal of Providence, Ports America of New Jersey and Logistec Corp. of Montreal.

White said the request was to "understand the market" and how to coordinate various types of cargo.

For example, one question that MassCEC has yet to answer is whether a port operator would oversee all cargo or just cargo that is not related to an offshore wind project.

"Whether the facility would be leased directly to an individual developer or if the developer would use the existing operator is still an open question," White said. The Standard-Times requested comment on the issue from all five companies that showed interest in being South Terminal's operator. BLG Logistics did not respond to the request. Ports America declined to comment.

Logistec, Vice President for Commercial Operations Frank Vannelli said that if his company operated South Terminal, he would prefer that Logistec coordinate all cargo, including offshore wind components.

"Any time you look at a port opportunity, besides the immediate project at hand, you want to look at what else could be handled in between," he said. "A wind project could be sustainable for years and while they are putting the turbines in the ocean we would be looking for the next shipments to come in."

Waterson Terminal's Chris Waterson agreed. He said his company has coordinated onshore wind turbine shipments at the same time as shipments of other types of cargo, like salt, coal and cobblestone.

Pierre Bernier at Maritime International said that while his company is the only one interested in South Terminal that has no experience in shipping turbine components, "I don't think it is a disadvantage."

"We would cooperate in our capacity as operators with the general contractors assembling the components," he said. He added that in addition to turbine components, he envisions South Terminal handling shipping containers.

MassCEC has not yet requested bids from operators interested in South Terminal. The agency is still reviewing responses to its request for interest and does not have a time line for when it would start the formal bidding process.

New Bedford Wind Energy Center Director Matthew Morrissey said that in Europe, port facilities that deal with offshore wind components simultaneously deal with other cargo too.

"Offshore wind components are a specialized kind of cargo," he said. "The models we see in Europe are truly multidisciplinary where you have one operator with experience in all areas coordinating the flow of all shipments."

Ultimately, Morrissey said decisions about South Terminal operations are up to the state and that the city "wants to ensure there's enough economic benefit as possible."

"We do believe there has been a really strong mix of interest," he said. "It is a very strong indication that there will be increased economic development in the city through offshore wind and cargo."


Source:http://www.southcoasttoday.co…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION