Article

Health affects at wind tribunal

Much of the first day of hearings by the Environmental Review Tribunal into an appeal against the Armow Wind Project in the Kincardine region centred on qualifications of a presenter and whether or not anecdotal medical testimony would be allowed without formal medical diagnosis.

(Kincardine ) - Much of the first day of hearings by the Environmental Review Tribunal into an appeal against the Armow Wind Project in the Kincardine region centred on qualifications of a presenter and whether or not anecdotal medical testimony would be allowed without formal medical diagnosis.

Retired engineer Bill Palmer was the subject of questioning by counsel for the Director, Ministry of the Environment, Danielle Meuleman and counsel for the Approval Holder, Samsung Pattern, Sarah Powell and appellant counsel Asha James.

Palmer says after the submissions from the three parties, the tribunal reserved judgement as to whether or not Palmer can testify as an expert.

The MOE and Samsung Pattern have concerns in that area.

Palmer says he's asked to be qualified as a professional engineer to testify about the public safety and acoustic issues that will relate to the Armow project.

Earlier in the day, the tribunal dismissed any effort to exclude medical evidence that wasn't backed up by formal medical diagnosis.

ERT Chair Marcia Valiante said witnesses could testify to personal health effects and symptoms but they could not draw conclusions from those events.

Appellate lawyer Asha James says she... more [truncated due to possible copyright]  

(Kincardine ) - Much of the first day of hearings by the Environmental Review Tribunal into an appeal against the Armow Wind Project in the Kincardine region centred on qualifications of a presenter and whether or not anecdotal medical testimony would be allowed without formal medical diagnosis.

Retired engineer Bill Palmer was the subject of questioning by counsel for the Director, Ministry of the Environment, Danielle Meuleman and counsel for the Approval Holder, Samsung Pattern, Sarah Powell and appellant counsel Asha James.

Palmer says after the submissions from the three parties, the tribunal reserved judgement as to whether or not Palmer can testify as an expert.

The MOE and Samsung Pattern have concerns in that area.

Palmer says he's asked to be qualified as a professional engineer to testify about the public safety and acoustic issues that will relate to the Armow project.

Earlier in the day, the tribunal dismissed any effort to exclude medical evidence that wasn't backed up by formal medical diagnosis.  

ERT Chair Marcia Valiante said witnesses could testify to personal health effects and symptoms but they could not draw conclusions from those events.

Appellate lawyer Asha James says she believes the tribunals decision is the correct one.

The hearings come as a result of an appeal by Ken and Sharon Kroeplin who charge the Armow wind project could be a major threat to their health.

The Kroeplins say one of the more than 90 turbines to be constructed will be within 600 metres of their home.

The hearing continues Friday and an additional three weeks have been set aside in January, beginning on the 6th.

The Armow Wind project was approved by the province in October.


Source: http://www.bayshorebroadcas...

DEC 20 2013
https://www.windaction.org/posts/39328-health-affects-at-wind-tribunal
back to top