Controversial Burnham-On-Sea wind farm bid is rejected
Burnham-on-sea.com|August 8, 2006
A controversial bid to build five wind turbines on the outskirts of Burnham-On-Sea was unanimously thrown out by district planners on Tuesday morning (August 8th).
A controversial bid to build five wind turbines on the outskirts of Burnham-On-Sea was unanimously thrown out by district planners on Tuesday morning (August 8th).
Sedgemoor District Council's Development Control Committee decided not to allow Ecotricity to use the Inner Farm site to build its proposed wind farm - much to the delight of protesters fighting the plans .
Councillors threw out the application after considering the overall case and hearing from local groups.
At the meeting, members of FORCE (Families for Clean Energy) spoke out in favour of the development, while opposing organisation KNOll to Wind Farm outlined why it believed the scheme would not be in the best interests of the area.
After the decision, Sedgemoor District Council spokeswoman Claire Faun outlined the three key reasons for refusal. These were as follows:
1. Notwithstanding the significant issue of renewable …
... more [truncated due to possible copyright]Sedgemoor District Council's Development Control Committee decided not to allow Ecotricity to use the Inner Farm site to build its proposed wind farm - much to the delight of protesters fighting the plans .
Councillors threw out the application after considering the overall case and hearing from local groups.
At the meeting, members of FORCE (Families for Clean Energy) spoke out in favour of the development, while opposing organisation KNOll to Wind Farm outlined why it believed the scheme would not be in the best interests of the area.
After the decision, Sedgemoor District Council spokeswoman Claire Faun outlined the three key reasons for refusal. These were as follows:
1. Notwithstanding the significant issue of renewable energy provision and the potential shortfall in the Somerset County target, the proposal would lead to an unacceptably adverse impact on the character of the landscape. By virtue of the location and size of the turbines and their associated blades, the proposal would adversely affect local landscape character when viewed from publicly accessible vantage points and the wider area. This development proposal, and in particular the mass, height and design of the turbine structures, does not replace, repair or otherwise add to the stock of features that create local distinctiveness. The proposal therefore fails to accord with Planning Policy Statement 22 Renewable Energy, Policy 64 of the Somerset and Exmoor National Park Joint Structure Plan, and policies CNE2, CNE17 and criteria (a) of policy PCS5 of the Sedgemoor District Local Plan.
2. The proposed turbines and their associated blades will have an unacceptable impact on the amenities of a number of properties and their occupiers within the ural linear settlement of Brent Knoll and in particular the south west of Brent Street which are within close proximity to the wind turbines by virtue of the visual effect when viewed from these properties. As such it would not meet all the criteria (b) within policy PCS5 of the Sedgemoor District Local Plan.
3. The proposed turbines and their associated blades would be seen in close juxtaposition with the village of Brent Knoll, the Grade 1 listed Church of St Michael, and in views from Public Rights of Way in the vicinity. The setting of this Listed Building, characterised by a rural landscape with groups of trees and woodlands on the lower slopes of the Knoll surrounding the church tower would not be preserved and the proposal is therefore contrary to Planning Policy Guidance 15 (Planning and The Historic Environment), and Policy HE11 and Policy PCS5(b) of the Sedgemoor District Local Plan.
The applicants, Ecotricity, have six months if they wish to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.