logo
Article

Offshore wind project put on hold after political battle over energy bill

Bangor Daily News|Christopher Cousins and Whit Richardson|July 3, 2013
MaineOffshore Wind

"Given the risk and uncertainty created by LD 1472, Statoil is therefore preparing to put the Hywind Maine Project on hold, while we continue to assess the changes made to the law, the total risk picture and progress plan going forward. We will keep the option open to re-initiate project activity if a [power purchase agreement] can be concluded according to the term sheet, and the total risk picture in Maine is acceptable," the company wrote in its letter to the PUC.


AUGUSTA, Maine - Statoil North America is putting its efforts to develop an offshore wind energy project in Maine on hold until the fall because of last-minute legislative changes to the state's energy policy. Those changes stalled Statoil's already approved project while allowing the University of Maine a second chance to submit a proposal to the state.

Statoil informed the Maine Public Utilities Commission of its decision in a letter Wednesday. In it, Lars Johannes Nordli, Statoil's vice president of wind development, said the company had reviewed the language of LD 1472 and decided it was in the company's best interest to put its Hywind Maine Project on hold. The bill allowed the University of Maine and its Advanced Structures and …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

AUGUSTA, Maine - Statoil North America is putting its efforts to develop an offshore wind energy project in Maine on hold until the fall because of last-minute legislative changes to the state's energy policy. Those changes stalled Statoil's already approved project while allowing the University of Maine a second chance to submit a proposal to the state.

Statoil informed the Maine Public Utilities Commission of its decision in a letter Wednesday. In it, Lars Johannes Nordli, Statoil's vice president of wind development, said the company had reviewed the language of LD 1472 and decided it was in the company's best interest to put its Hywind Maine Project on hold. The bill allowed the University of Maine and its Advanced Structures and Composites Center to move forward with an offshore wind demonstration project.

"The language of the bill as adopted is somewhat unclear," Nordli wrote. "However, Statoil interprets it to mean that the future of any contract for the Hywind Maine Project is in doubt, and that any final approval of such a contract would not occur by this summer as anticipated.

"Given the risk and uncertainty created by LD 1472, Statoil is therefore preparing to put the Hywind Maine Project on hold, while we continue to assess the changes made to the law, the total risk picture and progress plan going forward. We will keep the option open to re-initiate project activity if a [power purchase agreement] can be concluded according to the term sheet, and the total risk picture in Maine is acceptable," the company wrote in its letter to the PUC.

Contacted by the Bangor Daily News, Statoil spokesman Ola Aanestad confirmed that the company is putting its Hywind Maine Project on hold. In an email, he said the company "respects the legislative processes" and that it will "continue a robust dialogue with stakeholders related to the Hywind Maine project."

However, Aanestad said Maine is not the only place the company is looking to launch its pilot project.

"Statoil is considering several locations for building a pilot park based on the Hywind floating concept, in addition to Maine."

Senate President Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said Wednesday that he and Senate Majority Leader Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, had a conference call Wednesday morning with Statoil officials.

"They told us that they are putting every investment, every partnership and every collaboration on hold in the state of Maine because of the uncertainty and risk involved with their project," said Alfond. "Some of our worst fears have come true. ... This is a very, very bad day for the state of Maine."

Alfond attacked Gov. Paul LePage and Senate Republicans for scuttling the deal, which he said would have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars of investment in Maine and hundreds of jobs.

"This is politics at its worst," said Alfond. "It's changing the rules midstream. It sends a terrible signal. Why would an international corporation go to a state where regulations can change midstream?"

LePage has long been a critic of wind energy in Maine and has opposed supporting Statoil's pilot wind energy project with funds from electric ratepayers.

LePage vetoed an omnibus energy bill that lawmakers worked on for most of the legislative session. As a condition of his support of the bill, LePage wanted the PUC to reopen its case to allow University of Maine to have an opportunity to lobby the PUC for ratepayer support, even though the university did not respond to the request for proposals that resulted in the Statoil deal.

The omnibus energy bill was vetoed by LePage June 19, but lawmakers strongly overrode the veto, including a unanimous vote in the Senate. That came after passage of LD 1472.

Patrick Woodcock, director of LePage's energy office, said Statoil's announcement Wednesday was expected.

"I don't see anything surprising," he said. "It's been clear for awhile that the company had second thoughts about moving forward with the project. ... I think this reinforces that if a company cannot wait a few months for a $200 million contract to be executed, it certainly shows a lack of commitment to a project and secondly raises the question of whether we could have a better partner for development of offshore wind in the state of Maine. If anyone had spoken with the PUC recently they would be aware that they had already decided prior to the passage of the legislation to delay a final decision."

Goodall said Wednesday he had never heard anyone from Statoil indicate that they were not committed to the Maine project or that they would put it on hold.

"This is the first time that I have ever heard that statement," said Goodall, who said he's talked with Statoil executives frequently in recent weeks. "Patrick Woodcock's statement clearly seems to be injecting politics into this greater discussion. It's very frustrating that he's using such statements. They're completely contrary to everything I have heard from Statoil."

On June 24, the day after LD 1472, passed, LePage dodged any responsibility for the legislation.

"I'm not reneging on anything," LePage said, referring to the deal the PUC approved with Statoil in January. "I didn't do it. The Legislature did it. I wasn't there. I was in bed."

Adrienne Bennett, LePage's spokeswoman, elaborated on LePage's position.

"The amendment would allow for more competition with UMaine, and that's simply something he thought was necessary to move forward," Bennett said June 24.

"We also think our home, our flagship university should have that ability to compete for a project that's going to benefit the state of Maine and beyond. That's really where he's coming from on that, allow for open competition and allow our flagship to be part of it."

Statoil's decision could be a major blow to Maine's development of an offshore wind industry.

"These types of opportunities do not happen often and they definitely do not happen often in Maine," wrote Annette Bossler, an international business consultant in Bremen, in testimony to the PUC when the commission was considering Statoil's project.

"If the Statoil Hywind project in Maine does not happen, the result will be that Maine will be off the list for floating offshore. If a major player in the floating offshore wind industry such as Statoil starts the work in Maine but then the project does not happen, that news will go global as well as the reasons why," she wrote.


Source:http://bangordailynews.com/20…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION