Library filed under Legal from UK

Stuartfield couple win battle against ‘jet-like’ turbines

Mr and Mrs Milne did not object to the development, as they were never given notice of them during the planning process. But the couple – who had considered building their own turbine on the land by their home – became so fed up with the noise that they complained to the council, and after being unsatisfied with the impact the noise notice issued, decided to go to Aberdeen Sheriff Court to get their own order.
9 Mar 2019

Contractors beware: Robin Rigg ruling has wide-ranging ramifications

"This judgment will come as a shock to many.  The Supreme Court determined that the contractor, MT Højgaard, was under an obligation to ensure that the offshore windfarm's foundations would have a minimum lifetime of 20 years.  This effectively placed on the contractor the consequences of an error in the international standard to which they were working. 
3 Aug 2017

Offshore Wind Contract Conundrum Heads to Supreme Court

The English Supreme Court is due to hear an appeal on the long-running dispute in connection with the Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm. ...At issue is whether E.ON (the employer) or Højgaard (the contractor) must bear the approximate €26 million cost of remedying failed grouted connections between monopiles and transition pieces at Robin Rigg.
1 Jun 2017

Wind farm appeal

A wind farm on the outskirts of Hilltown could still be on the cards as an appeal against its refusal will be heard later this year.
1 Mar 2017

http://www.windaction.org/posts?location=UK&topic=Legal
back to top