Articles filed under Zoning/Planning from New York
The 54-page proposed law restricts any wind energy systems from being built in residential or business districts or within the boundaries of the town's local waterfront revitalization program. The revised law was created with the help of an ad hoc committee that included town officials and residents appointed by the town and Apex. ...Taylor Quarles, development manger for Apex Clean Energy, said the amended law is effectively a ban on wind energy in the town.
Two zoning amendments for the town of Somerset – including an updated wind energy conservation system law – were approved at Monday’s Niagara County Planning Board meeting.
Somerset Town Supervisor Daniel M. Engert’s proposed new law regulating wind power developments would require companies to pay property owners reimbursements if their property values fall because of the proximity of wind turbines. It also would require a company to pay for a baseline health study of town residents before the turbines go up, and limits the areas in which turbines could be built.
Supervisor Dan Engert presented a proposed local law Wednesday that would amend the Somerset town zoning code regarding commercial and industrial wind energy conversion systems, such as those being proposed by Lighthouse Wind.
The project is said to be a 201-megawatt initiative, placing 58 to 70 wind turbines – which may be as tall as 620 feet in Somerset and neighboring Yates in Orleans County. The preliminary scoping statement was released for public comment on Nov. 23. The comment period continues through Jan. 6.
The Lewis County Planning Board on Thursday signed off on amended plans for the Copenhagen Wind Farm project that now features fewer, but slightly taller, towers. “The zoning is still the same,” county Planning Director Frank J. Pace said.
Under the new law, the Planning Board must approve or disapprove of wind turbines. It appears that Jablonski could get approval under the new law, but it provides for just one wind turbine per property. He then would have to go back to the Zoning Board to ask for a variance for the second one.
The Catlin Town Board unanimously passed tight regulations intended to be a de facto ban on commercial wind turbines Thursday, putting a large-scale wind project by Florida-based NextEra Energy in doubt
A public hearing is scheduled next month on a proposed law intended to give second thoughts to anyone who wants to build a wind turbine farm to generate energy in the Town of Catlin.
The town has no regulations governing “residential” wind turbines, town planner Drew Reilly said. This means that right now, such turbines are prohibited – but the board held the hearing to discuss proposed regulations for them.
After a contentious public hearing last week, the Town Board voted Tuesday to adopt a local law establishing regulations for the development of wind turbines in the town.
Town Supervisor Fran Enjem said he expects the town board will discuss the ramifications of the decision in June. He also said he wants to strengthen the provisions in the community host agreement between the town and the developer. Enjem pointed out that he never signed that agreement.
Following a public hearing attended by 25 people, the Dix town board chose to not take action on the proposed wind farm regulations Monday, April 27. Residents from both inside and outside the town of Dix voiced their concerns, which ranged from health and wildlife impacts to property values and setbacks.
A set of regulations for residential wind power facilities in the Town of Pendleton won the approval of the Niagara County Planning Board Monday, with the recommendation that the town adopt a noise ordinance to go along with it.
It calls for wind companies to post bonds to cover any decrease in residents’ property values from having turbines near their land. It would also make the companies liable for medical bills caused by health impacts such as noise exposure and shadow flicker, a strobe-like effect created by spinning turbine blades said to cause seizures and other issues.
The town's planning and zoning board tabled a decision on whether to grant the greenhouse a zoning variance Tuesday night. The turbine's proposed height is greater than the 60 foot tower limit in Clarence.
“If this project goes forward, all that will be accomplished is us giving millions of tax dollars to a multi-million dollar company to screw up our town ... A project of this scope and magnitude has no place in Yates, or anywhere else for that matter. What we need is sound, systematic commercial and residential growth, not wind farms.”
The board asked the Planniong Board to draw up an ordinance after the board was asked to consider whether to allow Mapleton Road resident Thomas Izard to erect a 100-foot tower with a wind turbine on top.
This sudden political wind shift has its roots in local citizen opposition based on concerns about noise, visual blight and environmental issues. It also springs from fears the state could usurp town authority ...But at the bottom of it all is a sense of unease over any project that seems, well, just way too big, too complicated or too difficult to control.
Catlin officials had been close to enacting new regulations limiting where the turbines - which would be 430 feet tall - could be located. However, the town is now moving toward an outright ban instead, said Catlin Town Supervisor Laverne Phelps.