logo
Article

Ex-Missouri governor urges court to allow wind-energy line

STLtoday|David A. Lieb|April 3, 2018
MissouriTransmission

It's one of the longest transmission lines proposed in the U.S. But it was rejected last year by Missouri utility commissioners whom Nixon appointed. The state Public Service Commission cited a state appeals court ruling in a separate case that determined a utility first must get approval from local governments to string power lines across roads before the state regulatory commission can grant permission.


JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri's former governor, now arguing as a private attorney, urged the state's highest court on Tuesday to overturn a decision blocking a proposed 780-mile power line that would carry wind energy across the Midwest.

Former Gov. Jay Nixon, who backed the project before his term ended in January 2017, led a team of lawyers arguing before the Missouri Supreme Court on behalf Clean Line Energy Partners. The Houston-based renewable energy firm wants to build a $2.3 billion transmission line from western Kansas across Missouri and Illinois to an Indiana power grid serving eastern states.

It's one of the longest transmission lines proposed in the U.S. But it was rejected last year by Missouri utility …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri's former governor, now arguing as a private attorney, urged the state's highest court on Tuesday to overturn a decision blocking a proposed 780-mile power line that would carry wind energy across the Midwest.

Former Gov. Jay Nixon, who backed the project before his term ended in January 2017, led a team of lawyers arguing before the Missouri Supreme Court on behalf Clean Line Energy Partners. The Houston-based renewable energy firm wants to build a $2.3 billion transmission line from western Kansas across Missouri and Illinois to an Indiana power grid serving eastern states.

It's one of the longest transmission lines proposed in the U.S. But it was rejected last year by Missouri utility commissioners whom Nixon appointed. The state Public Service Commission cited a state appeals court ruling in a separate case that determined a utility first must get approval from local governments to string power lines across roads before the state regulatory commission can grant permission.

Nixon argued that was an "erroneous interpretation" that ran contrary to more than 70 years or precedent.

Using a hand-held laser, the former Democratic governor pointed judges to three large posters he placed in the courtroom, displaying the highlighted text of Missouri's law regarding certificates to construct electric lines and receive franchises. He argued that the law envisions two distinct certificates, and that only the franchise to serve customers — which Clean Line isn't seeking — requires pre-approval from local governments.

To interpret the law otherwise would lead to a "myriad of other permissions making it impossible" to build a power line, Nixon told the judges.

Attorney Paul Agathan, representing landowners opposed to the power line, argued that Clean Line essentially was seeking franchise permission from counties and thus should need their pre-approval. Some landowners have opposed the project because of it could be an eyesore and hurt their property values.

The seven-member Missouri Supreme Court includes two judges appointed by Nixon — George Draper III and Paul Wilson, who was a longtime aide to Nixon in the governor's and attorney general's offices. Neither judge recused himself from the case, and neither asked questions during the roughly 30-minutes of arguments.

Most of the questioning was done by Judge Laura Denvir Stith, the longest serving member of the court.

Nixon and Agathan both have said they see no conflict of interest with Nixon arguing before judges he appointed.

Clean Line began working toward its Grain Belt Express power line in 2010. Missouri was the only state where it lacked regulatory approval until March, when an Illinois appeals court overturned that's state's approval. The Illinois court said Clean Line didn't qualify as a public utility there because it didn't own property.

Mark Lawlor, Clean Line's vice president of development, said the company could purchase something like a transmission line or substation in Illinois and reapply for approval.

He said Missouri's regulatory approval was "essential" for the project to go forward.

"Transmission lines and infrastructure unfortunately are really hard to do in this country," Lawlor said outside of court. "The big projects like this that have happened have often taken a decade and a lot of persistence. We're still confident we can make it work."

The proposed power line would carry about 4,000 megawatts of power. About 500 megawatts would be available to sell in Missouri, and a coalition of Missouri municipal utilities already has agreed to purchase some of that. Attorneys for the coalition said that if the case is not resolved in about a year, they may have to look for alternative sources of power.


Source:http://www.stltoday.com/news/…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION