logo
Article

Massachusetts at risk of losing some Cape Wind jobs to Rhode Island

State House News Service|Michael Norton|December 5, 2012
MassachusettsRhode IslandGeneral

The Patrick administration placed the project's cost at $100 million and project proponents touted its potential to serve the offshore wind industry. In an interview Tuesday, Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Rick Sullivan acknowledged Massachusetts and Rhode Island are competing for the Cape Wind jobs. Massachusetts was not looking to sweeten its infrastructure effort with loans or grants.


Assembly of turbines in New Bedford no sure thing

BOSTON -- More than two years after the Patrick administration committed to a $35 million New Bedford marine terminal project to serve as a staging area for Cape Wind, state officials are now talking up a complex, $100 million project while the developers of the offshore wind farm have held talks with Rhode Island about using that state as a project assembly area.

In October 2010, Gov. Deval Patrick traveled to New Bedford to announce a multi-purpose terminal would be built there to support offshore wind efforts, with administration officials estimating construction costs at $35 million and saying the overhauled pier would capture 600 to 1,000 Cape Wind jobs.

Two weeks ago, in …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

Assembly of turbines in New Bedford no sure thing

BOSTON -- More than two years after the Patrick administration committed to a $35 million New Bedford marine terminal project to serve as a staging area for Cape Wind, state officials are now talking up a complex, $100 million project while the developers of the offshore wind farm have held talks with Rhode Island about using that state as a project assembly area.

In October 2010, Gov. Deval Patrick traveled to New Bedford to announce a multi-purpose terminal would be built there to support offshore wind efforts, with administration officials estimating construction costs at $35 million and saying the overhauled pier would capture 600 to 1,000 Cape Wind jobs.

Two weeks ago, in announcing federal environmental approvals had been granted for the project, the Patrick administration placed the project's cost at $100 million and project proponents touted its potential to serve the offshore wind industry with less of a focus on jobs specific to the Cape Wind project, which has been in the planning phases for more than a decade in the midst of constant opposition from its critics.

In an interview Tuesday, Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Rick Sullivan acknowledged Massachusetts and Rhode Island are competing for the Cape Wind jobs and said Massachusetts was not looking to sweeten its infrastructure effort with loans or grants.

"There absolutely is a competition," he said. "You have a lot of states that are looking at offshore wind."

Sullivan said the New Bedford marine terminal project's pure construction costs remain at around $35 million but costs associated with dredging, land acquisition, site assembly, and environmental remediation raise the overall cost to $100 million. "That's everything, soup to nuts," Sullivan said.

Cape Wind, through spokesman Mark Rodgers, declined to comment on talks between the offshore wind developer and Rhode Island officials or the project's staging area plans. Aides to Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee did not return a call seeking information about dealings with Cape Wind, which has won numerous approvals needed to build a wind farm in Nantucket Sound.

Rhode Island officials are positioning the Quonset Business Park in North Kingstown, a 3,200-acre tract four miles south of Rte. 95, to become a hub for the renewable energy industry. The park's overseers say projects underway there account for $170 million in private investment, with plans for Deepwater Wind at Quonset to make the park its regional headquarters and staging and assembly facility. Park overseers say Alterra Energy Services has proposed building a renewable alternative fuel facility there as well.

Sen. Mark Montigny and Rep. Antonio Cabral, who each represent New Bedford, recently acknowledged Cape Wind's talks with Rhode Island over a staging area in Quonset, according to New England Cable News. The NECN report quoted a Cape Wind spokesman saying it was an "open question" whether the New Bedford terminal would be ready, in part due to slow permitting, in time for Cape Wind's needs.

Rep. Robert Koczera (D-New Bedford) told the News Service Wednesday that his city is in a good position to win the Cape Wind jobs, and, like Sullivan, he emphasized the terminal's long-term benefits, apart from Cape Wind, to serve the cargo, fishing, shipping and developing offshore wind industries.

While describing wind energy as the "impetus" for the Patrick administration's investment in the terminal, Koczera said it's possible that Cape Wind could use staging areas in both states. "With Cape Wind, they want to make sure that whatever site they use, that it will be a site that's ready," Koczera said.

Kozcera added, "The preference of Cape Wind would be New Bedford. They will look and have some discussion with Rhode Island but so long as the New Bedford site is available, that would be the preferred site."

With the EPA approvals in hand, Sullivan said he expects the New Bedford project to go out to bid in the next couple of weeks, with bidders given 45 to 60 days to respond. He estimated construction would require 19 months to complete, which means the terminal project would be finished in late 2014.

The U.S. Department of Energy estimates offshore wind projects could create 43,000 jobs by 2020 and Sullivan said he believes Massachusetts can secure a majority of those jobs. "We think New Bedford and the region are well-positioned to take advantage of that job creation," he said.

According to the Patrick administration, the marine commerce terminal in New Bedford, in addition to having the capacity to serve as wind energy staging area, will be able to handle high-volume bulk and container shipping and specialty marine cargo. Following the EPA approval last month, Patrick said the project would make Massachusetts "the East Coast hub for offshore wind development while strengthening New Bedford's position as a port city."

The project involves the cleanup from the floor of New Bedford Harbor of 244,600


Source:http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION