logo
Article

Offshore wind farm firm appeals court decision

Kingston Whig-Standard |Peter Hendra|November 6, 2012
New YorkCanadaGeneral

A company suing the province over the moratorium placed on offshore wind projects is appealing a judge’s decision to have that lawsuit dismissed. Trillium Wind Power Corp. is hoping to build a 120-turbine, 600-megawatt wind project 28 kilometres south of Prince Edward County, just south of the Duck Islands.


KINGSTON - A company suing the province over the moratorium placed on offshore wind projects is appealing a judge’s decision to have that lawsuit dismissed.
 
Trillium Wind Power Corp. is hoping to build a 120-turbine, 600-megawatt wind project 28 kilometres south of Prince Edward County, just south of the Duck Islands.
 
The Ontario government, however, put offshore projects on indefinite hold in February 2011, stating that more research needed to be conducted before it would allow them to move ahead.
 
Trillium then filed a $2.25-billion lawsuit against the Ontario government for “cancelling” its project, said John Kourtoff, the firm's chief executive and director.
 
In return, the province made a Rule 21 motion, which is often used to …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]

KINGSTON - A company suing the province over the moratorium placed on offshore wind projects is appealing a judge’s decision to have that lawsuit dismissed.
 
Trillium Wind Power Corp. is hoping to build a 120-turbine, 600-megawatt wind project 28 kilometres south of Prince Edward County, just south of the Duck Islands.
 
The Ontario government, however, put offshore projects on indefinite hold in February 2011, stating that more research needed to be conducted before it would allow them to move ahead.
 
Trillium then filed a $2.25-billion lawsuit against the Ontario government for “cancelling” its project, said John Kourtoff, the firm's chief executive and director.
 
In return, the province made a Rule 21 motion, which is often used to have an action dismissed because it is considered “frivolous,” said Kourtoff.
 
Trillium is appealing the motion.
 
“Our case is not frivolous,” he said. “We have data and information and we have work that was done and we’re prepared to take it before a trial. This denied us the opportunity to go to trial.”
 
In its appeal, Trillium states that, in the October decision, there were errors in points of law and evidence.
 
Kourtoff said that his company’s proposed project is a true offshore project whereas others are “near-shore” projects.
 
If the Ontario government were to relax its moratorium on offshore wind projects, Trillium would drop its lawsuit, Kourtoff said.
 
“We just don’t think litigation is the right way,” he said, but added that the company is prepared to go to trial for as long as it takes.
 
Instead, Kourtoff believes the government should take a methodical approach to developing wind farms, by first allowing those situated furthest away from land to be built, such as the one Trillium hopes to build south of Prince Edward Country, and then studying its impacts.
 
“Just allowing sort of a Klondike-gold rush mentality never suits any industry, I don’t care what industry it is,” Kourtoff said. “We’re trying to avoid that.”
 
Trillium has conducted extensive studies and is “not afraid of going through the environmental process,” Kourtoff said.
 
He said that studies conducted by naturalists on what impact the turbines would have on bird and bat populations overstates that impact.
 
For the county project, the company held open houses in Napanee, Picton and Cape Vincent, N.Y., even though Kourtoff said the last one wasn’t required.
 
“What we want to do is build things intelligently, and it’s that ‘intelligently’ that we were denied,” Kourtoff said.
 
“And, as being the leader in North America, it was obviously even worse for Ontarians because instead of being at the forefront of one of the renewable industries — which so far we haven’t been, we’ve always been playing catch-up — we’re basically shooting our pioneers, and that’s not a good way to be at the forefront of anything.”


Source:http://www.thewhig.com/2012/1…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION