logo
Article

State asks whether wind farm projects are separate

The Oregonian|Gail Kinsey Hill|August 31, 2008
OregonEnergy PolicyZoning/Planning

Chris Crowley, head of Columbia Energy Partners, filed separate applications for the three wind projects he called the Echanis, East Ridge and West Ridge wind farms. They lie next to each other ...Each would generate a maximum of 104 megawatts. Any project with a capacity of 105 megawatts or more triggers review by the state. The county reviews smaller ones. "These are blatant attempts to circumvent the public process," said Dave Becker, an attorney with the Oregon Natural Desert Association. The state's Energy Facility Siting Council should review the projects, he said.


Critics say the proposals were divided to avoid scrutiny; State asks whether projects are separate

Another conflict is stirring over the Steens Mountain projects -- one that could bring the force of the state into Harney County's wind power debate and strain relations between local planners and Oregon regulators.

Chris Crowley, head of Columbia Energy Partners, filed separate applications for the three wind projects he called the Echanis, East Ridge and West Ridge wind farms. They lie next to each other, just outside the northern boundary of the Steens Mountain Wilderness area. Each would generate a maximum of 104 megawatts.

Any project with a capacity of 105 megawatts or more triggers review by the state. The county reviews smaller …

... more [truncated due to possible copyright]
Critics say the proposals were divided to avoid scrutiny; State asks whether projects are separate

Another conflict is stirring over the Steens Mountain projects -- one that could bring the force of the state into Harney County's wind power debate and strain relations between local planners and Oregon regulators.

Chris Crowley, head of Columbia Energy Partners, filed separate applications for the three wind projects he called the Echanis, East Ridge and West Ridge wind farms. They lie next to each other, just outside the northern boundary of the Steens Mountain Wilderness area. Each would generate a maximum of 104 megawatts.

Any project with a capacity of 105 megawatts or more triggers review by the state. The county reviews smaller ones.

"These are blatant attempts to circumvent the public process," said Dave Becker, an attorney with the Oregon Natural Desert Association. The state's Energy Facility Siting Council should review the projects, he said.

Crowley said "sincere and legitimate reasons" prompted the separate applications. Financing and transmission arrangements are easier to negotiate, as are power sales contracts, he said. "A local entity can make a more informed and nuanced decision."

The state isn't so sure. The Oregon Department of Energy, which serves as the siting council's staff, wrote a letter to the Harney County planning director Aug. 19. The agency said it needed additional information to "determine whether these projects are in fact fully separate projects."


Source:http://www.oregonlive.com/env…

Share this post
Follow Us
RSS:XMLAtomJSON
Donate
Donate
Stay Updated

We respect your privacy and never share your contact information. | LEGAL NOTICES

Contact Us

WindAction.org
Lisa Linowes, Executive Director
phone: 603.838.6588

Email contact

General Copyright Statement: Most of the sourced material posted to WindAction.org is posted according to the Fair Use doctrine of copyright law for non-commercial news reporting, education and discussion purposes. Some articles we only show excerpts, and provide links to the original published material. Any article will be removed by request from copyright owner, please send takedown requests to: info@windaction.org

© 2024 INDUSTRIAL WIND ACTION GROUP CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WEBSITE GENEROUSLY DONATED BY PARKERHILL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION