Opinions
Category:
Energy Policy and Minnesota
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Energy Policy
(609)
All > Location > USA > Minnesota (11)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > Minnesota (11)
Any of these categories
Coal mines always have been big business. Wind farms are getting to be.
And when heavy-hitting companies such as North American Coal Corp., Minnesota Power and Florida Power and Light are eyeing an area of real estate, you bet it's consequential.
The real estate isn't paltry; it's a lot of acreage in Oliver and Morton counties.
Minnesota Power and FPL want to build separate wind farms. But the coal company says, "Wait a minute, we may want to mine where you guys are talking about putting up wind turbines. That won't work."
Also filed under [
Montana|
North Dakota]
North Dakota Public Service Commissioner Kevin Cramer has the right idea when he said this week it is time to bring coal and wind-power industries together to talk about development in the state.
FPL Energy of Juno Beach, Fla., is being joined by Minnesota Power of Duluth, Minn., in pursuing wind farms in Oliver and Mercer counties. FLP Energy already has filed papers with the state PSC for its 250 square-mile proposal in the two counties. Minnesota Power is expressing a desire for its own wind farm in Oliver County.
The primary problem arises, however, if these wind projects with their expensive turbines are targeted for land that holds coal to be mined.
Also filed under [
North Dakota]
Wind energy is not an alternative for baseload generation, and the Big Stone II plant will meet Minnesota's increasing demand for baseload electricity.
There still is a place for wind energy. The co-owners plan to purchase or install 850 megawatts of wind energy by 2015 in addition to constructing Big Stone II. But Minnesota will need baseload power - power that is available 24 hours a day/seven days a week - and wind energy cannot meet that reliability standard. ...Baseload generation is needed to help justify the million-dollars-a-mile that it costs to construct these transmission lines.
Also filed under [
South Dakota]
Local view: Using coal cleanly, not renewables, is our only hope for future energy
October 13, 2007 in Duluth News Tribune
October 13, 2007 in Duluth News Tribune
More than 100 years ago, erratic wind was replaced by more-dependable coal, then oil, as a means to propel us across oceans. The same dependability is needed for electric power plants. A look at the State Wind Map reveals another wind problem for the Duluth area.
Northeastern Minnesota has the lowest average wind velocity in the state. The best winds are far off, on Buffalo Ridge, in the southwest, requiring long and expensive transmission lines.
Nuclear energy offers reliable way to meet rising energy needs
August 7, 2007 in Minneapolis Star Tribune
August 7, 2007 in Minneapolis Star Tribune
Nuclear energy is a renewable, reliable, stable, homegrown energy source that does not emit greenhouse gasses, which many believe cause global warming. It works where other renewable sources are limited. It is impossible to produce solar or wind energy when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow, and Minnesota's climate can be inconsistent in meeting those needs. Nuclear energy does not share those same limitations.
Also filed under [
General]
Passing paper laws is easy; the laws of nature are a little tougher to amend.
Also filed under [
General]
Recently, Gov. Pawlenty signed a renewable energy standard in Minnesota. While proponents claim this standard will protect Minnesota’s environment and resources and help reduce global warming is only rhetoric and not fact. This initiative will cost you the taxpayer millions and produce no positive impact in Minnesota.
Also filed under [
General]