News
Category:
Impact on Bats and Impact on People
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on Wildlife
> Impact on Bats
(151)
All > Topics > Impact on People (1130)
Any of these categories
All > Topics > Impact on People (1130)
Any of these categories
Although the zoning board now has ruled to approve a portion of the proposed wind turbines, recent action by the board of county commissioners would allow a wind power project to start without going before the zoning board.
Earlier this month, Commissioners Vincent Zapotosky and Vincent A. Vicites voted to change the zoning ordinance to allow wind turbines as a permitted use in A-1, M-1 light industrial and M-2 heavy industrial zones. Previously, wind turbines were only permitted after obtaining a special exception from the zoning board.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Pennsylvania]
Wind turbines could continue to sprout along the state's Appalachian ridgetops, as state regulators approved a project on the Randolph/Barbour County border in November. The same company applied in December to build a project in Grant County, while another developer announced plans in January for a project near Keyser.
Industry growth may be slowing, however, as the national economic recession dries up the investment capital needed to build new projects.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
West Virginia]
Expanding wind industry hits bats, turbulence and lawsuits
June 12, 2008 by Christa Marshall in Climate Wire
June 12, 2008 by Christa Marshall in Climate Wire
The prospect of thousands of endangered bats flying to their deaths in West Virginia wind turbines soon could get consideration in federal court because of Judy Rodd.
The 63-year-old is the president of Friends of Blackwater Canyon, which recently joined 10 other groups in filing a "notice of intent" with the Fish and Wildlife Service to sue a wind company on Endangered Species Act grounds. The organizations warned of potential turbine kills of the Indiana bat, Virginia big-eared bat and Virginia northern flying squirrel.
"Yes, we're concerned about climate change," said Rodd in a phone interview. "But that doesn't mean they can't build the turbines somewhere else and let the bats live."
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
West Virginia]
Eric Glitzenstein, a Washington, D.C., attorney who is preparing the lawsuit, referred to the Endangered Species Act.
"The courts view the unauthorized loss of even a single member of such a species to be an irreparable harm that should be prevented," he wrote in an e-mail. The letter of intent is required by the Endangered Species Act, he said.
The groups have yet to decide where the suit would be filed, Glitzenstein added.
"Our hope is that Gamesa - which touts itself as an environmentally responsible company - will agree either to do the right thing and abandon this ill-considered project site or, at least, do what is required by federal law and not proceed without applying for an ‘incidental take permit' from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."
The Indiana bat has been a protected species since 1967.
Also filed under [
General|
Pennsylvania]
More bird, bat study opinions emerge: Local opponents warn about impact
June 1, 2007 by Rob Montana in The Evening Tribune
June 1, 2007 by Rob Montana in The Evening Tribune
News of a recently released consultants' study that found 123 birds and 326 bats dead - during a five-month period last year beneath approximately 50 turbines on the Tug Hill Plateau - has him worried the impact may be even more severe on birds and bats than the study found.
"It's not a good thing for avian life," Newhart said, adding he'd previously contacted Cornell University's ornithology department to check on impact turbines have. "I'm going to send this information out to Cornell to see if that engages them.