News
Category:
Washington
Before an audience of about 60 people, the company presented details of the firm's plans for the 69-turbine, $250 million to $300 million Vantage Wind Power Project located seven miles west of Vantage and 15 miles east of Ellensburg, sandwiched between Vantage Highway and Interstate 90.
Dave Iadarola, Invenergy's project developer, said the two, closest residents to the project are about three-forths of a mile from proposed turbine sites, and others are a mile or more away. He said the closest neighbors are supportive of the project.
A minimum setback of a half mile will be maintained between turbines and any structures, he said.
Also filed under [
General]
The joint public hearing on a wind farm proposal set for 6 p.m. Wednesday at the Kittitas County Fairgrounds will be the first time county government utilizes its new wind farm overlay zone ordinance to deal with a wind-power project.
The new ordinance, approved in July 2007, designates an approximate 500-square-mile area on the east end of the county as a zone pre-identified for general locations for wind farms.
A streamlined process required by the ordinance applies to companies seeking projects within the new zone that runs along the edge of the Columbia River. ...There are two pathways for wind-power generation companies to gain wind farm approvals in the county: file solely with the county utilizing local land-use ordinances or file with the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
4 towers would measure wind for possible turbines on Rattlesnake Hills
March 11, 2008 by Ingrid Stegemoeller in TriCity Herald
March 11, 2008 by Ingrid Stegemoeller in TriCity Herald
Four proposed towers in Yakima County may soon reveal whether the Rattlesnake Hills near Sunnyside are suitable for wind turbines.
Goldendale-based Northwest Wind Partners LLC has received tentative approval from a Yakima County hearing examiner to install four anemometers, or instruments that measure wind speed.
Hearing Examiner Gary Cuillier will issue a written ruling sometime next week, after giving a verbal go-ahead in a hearing last week. ...Information gained from the towers will determine the possibility of putting turbines on the hillside, he said.
Windmills on Rattlesnake Mountain in Benton County have drawn some controversy in recent months, but Cuillier wasn't worried about that yet.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
Lawsuit aims to stop wind farm near Columbia River Gorge
March 7, 2008 by Erik Robinson in The Columbian
March 7, 2008 by Erik Robinson in The Columbian
A newly formed citizens organization has filed a lawsuit to block a wind farm from rising within sight of the Columbia River Gorge.
Save Our Scenic Area, a nonprofit organization based in Underwood, filed the lawsuit against Skamania County in Clark County Superior Court earlier this week.
The group contends Skamania County is violating the state Growth Management Act by failing to adequately protect commercial timberland and failing to properly zone the area where 44 giant wind turbines would rise.
The group's Seattle-based attorney said residents are concerned about a proposal by SDS Lumber Co. to locate a wind farm just outside the boundary of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area.
Also filed under [
General]
A 30-page list of requirements for the construction and operation of the proposed Vantage Wind Power Project was issued Monday by Kittitas County Development Services officials.
The list is part of the county's determination that an environmental impact statement is not necessary for the 69-turbine wind farm planned for a 4,750-acre site seven miles west of Vantage between Vantage Highway and Interstate 90.
What is required of the company proposing the $250 million, electricity-generating facility - Chicago-based Invenergy Wind North America LLC - is meeting the standards outlined by the county in its 30-page mitigated determination of non-significance, or MDNS.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
A Thurston County judge closed Kittitas County's investigations into alleged misbehavior by state officials Friday, sending the county's wind farm appeal to the state Supreme Court for a ruling.
Judge Richard Hicks certified case records from the county's challenge of Gov. Christine Gregoire's Sept. 18 decision to approve the Kittitas Valley wind farm, a 65-turbine project 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg.
His decision, finalized with a signature expected next week, sends the case as is to the Supreme Court. ...The court is under no deadline in this case and a decision could take months. In the meantime, development at the wind farm site is on hold.
Also filed under [
General]
Burton Hamner came into town to find out which way the wind is blowing. ...Hamner - who was hired in early 2007 by Tacoma Power to direct a team of leading Northwest marine engineering and environmental experts studying tidal power generation in the Tacoma Narrows - has formed a new company to propose a wind and wave energy project just off the coast. ..."If you all say ‘no, we don't like it,' we'll forget it," Hamner said.
He said he hopes he can at least convince people the idea is worthy of study so the potential and risk can be assessed.
Also filed under [
General]
A joint public hearing before Kittitas County commissioners and the county Planning Commission examining the 69-turbine Invenergy wind farm west of Vantage is set for March 12, according to county planning staff. ...Planner Joanna Valencia, with county Community Development Services, said the hearing before the two decision-making bodies will take testimony on the impacts of the proposed, $250 million wind farm and the adequacy of the applicant to mitigate or lessen those impacts. The company, Chicago-based Invenergy Wind North America LLC, filed for the wind farm under provisions of a new ordinance for wind-power projects within a 500-square-mile east-county area designated as a pre-identified zone for wind farms.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
Kittitas County legal officials say they're concerned that an official of the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council had improper contact with the governor's office and with others related to wind farm issues as the council prepared to make a decision on the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project.
County Deputy Prosecutor Neil Caulkins recently released the information in connection with the county's court appeal of Gov. Chris Gregoire's decision last year to approve the Kittitas Valley wind farm, a 65-turbine project planned for 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg and sought by Portugese-owned Horizon Wind Energy.
The county is challenging the wind farm's approval by the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, or EFSEC, and by Gregoire in the state Supreme Court.
Kittitas County, in a case joined with Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines and Steve Lathrop, want the governor's decision overturned.
Also filed under [
General]
Puget Sound Energy has blanketed a rock quarry atop central Washington's Whisky Dick Mountain with solar modules in an unprecedented effort to test the compatibility of sun and wind energy.
More than 2,000 panels stretch squat and angular alongside the tall, sweeping turbine blades of the utility's Wild Horse wind farm near Ellensburg. ...Wind power has become the country's fastest-growing source of renewable energy, pushed by fossil-fuel concerns and government subsidies. But its up-and-down nature is a significant drawback.
To ensure that customers get uninterrupted power, wind power must be blended with electricity from more reliable energy producers, such as hydroelectric dams and coal- and natural gas-fired power plants. The integration can get complicated, and it can increase costs.
Puget Sound Energy's decision to commingle solar and wind represents a groundbreaking effort to blend two clean but unpredictable sources of energy into a renewable hybrid with more reliable generating credentials.
Also filed under [
Technology]
Dollars and controversy blowing in the wind
December 27, 2007 by Dierdre Gregg in Puget Sound Business Journal
December 27, 2007 by Dierdre Gregg in Puget Sound Business Journal
Kittitas County, where strong winds whip across the landscape, is an ideal location for wind turbines. For some in the county, that's been a decidedly mixed blessing.
While wind-farm applications bring in permitting fees, and the existing Wild Horse wind project will generate about $1 million a year in property taxes, the County Commission is fighting two other wind-farm proposals in legal battles that may continue for months, if not years, to come.
Such battles may become more widespread as the state faces a steep and rising demand for renewable electricity. With the passage of Initiative 937 in 2006, the state's large utilities must get 15 percent of their electricity from non-hydroelectric renewable sources by 2020, spurring a hunt for suitable wind sites from wind-power developers.
That may well mean clashes with landowners who want to protect rural views and property values, and in some cases with environmentalists concerned about impacts on birds and wildlife.
Also filed under [
General]
EFSEC bias suspected; County prosecutors unveil e-mails from Chairman Luce
December 13, 2007 by Jim Fossett in Northern Kittitas County Tribune
December 13, 2007 by Jim Fossett in Northern Kittitas County Tribune
In what could be characterized as a startling new development, on Friday, Dec. 7 the Kittitas County prosecutor's office filed a petition with Thurston County Superior Court bringing to light evidence some countians agree challenges the integrity of the Governor's Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), the nine-member appointed board that recommended the Governor override Kittitas County Commissioners and allow a controversial 65-turbine wind farm to be built 12-miles northwest of Ellensburg. ..."We are finding other governing boards throughout the United States to be less than patient with the public's participation on wind farm projects and have long suspected undue influence coming from legislators and/or the governor's office, i.e., politicians anxious to demonstrate their state's green credentials and a general unwillingness to recognize the harmful impacts of wind energy on abutting properties and the natural environment."
Also filed under [
General]
Judge Richard Hicks ruled from the bench to deny a request from the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council and Gov. Chris Gregoire to close the official record on how EFSEC decided to recommend to Gregoire that she approve the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project, which she did Sept. 18. In so doing she overruled an earlier rejection of the project by county commissioners. ...e-mail records previously obtained that the appellants say allegedly show that EFSEC Chairman Jim Luce was biased against the county's position on the wind farm, prejudged the project before the county made its final case and violated appearance of fairness rules, in part, by communicating disdain for public input in the case.
Also filed under [
General]
Wind power project good fit for Skamania, official says
December 9, 2007 by Kathie Durbin in The Columbian
December 9, 2007 by Kathie Durbin in The Columbian
The proposed Saddleback Mountain wind project lies outside the boundary of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area - barely.
That's a sensitive point for SDS Lumber Co. President Jason Spadaro, because another proposed gorge wind project, which would skirt the scenic area boundary across the Columbia River between Mosier and The Dalles, Ore., has provoked strong opposition in gorge communities.
The turbines of the Cascade Wind Project, just south of the scenic area boundary, would be visible from several viewpoints within the scenic area, including Interstate 84, Washington state Highway 14 and Oregon's Rowena Plateau and McCall Point Trail.
Proposed by Massachusetts-based UPC Wind Partners, that project is on hold pending the company's response to numerous questions posed by the Oregon Department of Energy. ..."Most of the Underwood community is completely against the project," said Ronda Crumpacker, who owns property about a mile away. "It's not that any of us are against the power. We're all for renewable energy. But to site a power plant where you are going to see it from Underwood, Hood River and White Salmon. ..."
Also filed under [
General]
County: State biased in wind farm decision; Allegations leveled at EFSEC's chairman
December 5, 2007 by Mike Johnston in Daily Record
December 5, 2007 by Mike Johnston in Daily Record
Kittitas County on Wednesday charged a state council that makes decisions on county wind farms with being biased against the county's position and against public testimony from those in opposition to a local project and also alleged the council's chairman violated appearance of fairness rules.
Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) and governor-appointee, Jim Luce, prejudged the 65-turbine Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project before final decisions were made, was biased against the county's stance against the project and expressed disdain for public comment on the project.
"Those disclosures ... are startling and undermine basic tenants of how we all believe government should operate," Zempel said in the release.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Zoning/Planning]
Port of Longview commissioners Friday unanimously agreed to buy a $4.6 million mobile harbor crane to unload large wind-energy parts. ...It will be used to unload the towers, blades and hubs of giant wind turbines for Northwest wind energy farms.
The port currently rents a crane to unload wind-energy equipment, O'Hollaren said.
Also filed under [
General]
Purchasing a pair of new wind turbines east of the Cascades might let the county generate energy equivalent to all its gasoline, electricity and natural gas consumption as soon as 2009.
After the windmills sell their power on the open market, they'd pay for themselves and might leave some cash to spare, county General Services Director Mark McCauley said Wednesday.
The windmills would cost about $18 million, McCauley said. At current electric rates, they'd earn about $1.2 million in cash annually and pay for themselves after 18 years.
Also filed under [
General]
A state council halted Energy Northwest's application to build a $1.5 billion petcoke/ coal gasification plant at the Port Kalama Tuesday, saying the public power giant's plan failed to meet new state requirements for sequestering greenhouse gases. ...The proposed plant would use a new, cleaner technology called Integrated Gasfication Combined Cycle to produce power. Energy Northwest's plans call for gasifying petcoke, a waste product from manufacturing gasoline, though coal could also be gasified.
Company officials have argued that state environmental rules prevent them from injecting carbon gases into the ground, and they've made a "good faith" to develop a sequestration plan.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
Demand, scarcity take air out of wind power; New laws spur run on land, turbines
November 14, 2007 by Ted Sickinger in San Diego Union Tribune
November 14, 2007 by Ted Sickinger in San Diego Union Tribune
Looking east into Gilliam County and north into Washington, turbines are strung over ridgelines as far as the eye can see.
And there are nowhere near enough of them. ...West Coast utilities and independent power producers are locked in a land rush to secure the best wind sites and the power they produce. Coupled with a worldwide shortage of turbines and a falling dollar, the resulting scarcity is driving up the cost of wind power, a burden electricity ratepayers will shoulder.
Judge dismisses petition to recall Kittitas leaders
November 10, 2007 by Pat Muir in Yakima Herald-Republic
November 10, 2007 by Pat Muir in Yakima Herald-Republic
A judge on Friday dismissed a petition to recall all three Kittitas County commissioners. ...Knudson filed the recall petition saying he believes most Kittitas County residents disagree with the commissioners on the wind farm issue. The commissioners declined to permit the 65-turbine Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project, proposed for a site 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg.
Also filed under [
General]
| << Vermont | Wisconsin >> |