News
Category:
Virginia
Proposals for wind farms in the Valley are whipping up opposing viewpoints about the structures' effects on wildlife, local vistas and energy production.
Opponents say the turbines, each hundreds of feet tall, would mar the local landscape and endanger bats and birds, some of which are federally protected.
But proponents say the farms can be built with minimum impact on the environment to offer clean, alternative energy and a break from the nation's dependency on foreign oil. ...After studying maps and coordinates provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, consultant D. Daniel Boone, a conservation biologist and policy analyst, said the FreedomWorks' project could negatively affect untouched areas of the George Washington National Forest.
"Other than a power line and one small road which crosses between Hardy and Shenandoah counties, the project area is completely undisturbed forest with no sign of logging roads or clear-cuts," Boone stated.
Company begins filing initial turbine applications
March 25, 2008 by Carlos Santos in Richmond Times-Dispatch
March 25, 2008 by Carlos Santos in Richmond Times-Dispatch
An unnamed company has started the application process to build 131 of the massive wind turbines in the national forest in Rockingham County and along the border between Virginia's Shenandoah County and Hardy County in West Virginia.
"We're in the pre-application stage" with the company proposing to build the turbines, Chris Rose, a spokesman for the George Washington & Jefferson National Forests, said Monday. Rose declined to name the company, citing its early application status, which allows the federal agency to keep the name confidential.
Also filed under [
General|
West Virginia]
Both county and state permits have been granted to Highland New Wind Development for Virginia's first industrial wind utility, but there seems to be some confusion about what happens next.
Part of the trouble stems from determining exactly what the company needs to do in order to proceed with construction. There are a number of permits it needs, but there are several other steps HNWD must take to meet requirements set forth by Highland County and the State Corporation Commission. Those include getting approvals on a number of things as recommended by the state Department of Environmental Quality. And some of those will apparently be tough to get without a final site plan of the project.
Also filed under [
General]
Local governments in western Virginia are beginning to craft land-use regulations to give them tighter control over where wind turbines could be built, even as energy companies study the area's potential for large wind farms.
Mountainous Bland and Bath counties are looking to develop ordinances governing wind turbines. Giles County, meanwhile, recently created a permit process that allows farmers and landowners to build and operate single turbines; but the permit process does not open the door wider for commercial wind farms. The permit process is similar to ones adopted by Pulaski and Rockingham counties. ...The prospect of more money did not persuade Patrick County officials to embrace wind farms. Last year, amid hue and cry from landowners after a Pennsylvania company's proposal to build 20 giant turbines several hundred feet high in Patrick, county supervisors adopted an ordinance banning structures of more than 100 feet high. The company dropped its proposal.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning|
West Virginia]
Highland citizens have once again reminded county supervisors of their intent to sue the board if proper conditions are not met by Highland New Wind Development LLC.
In a Feb. 27 letter addressed to the board, county attorney Melissa Dowd, county administrator Roberta Lambert, and zoning administrator Jim Whitelaw, the law firm of Woods Rogers outlined the citizens' expectations based on the conditional use permit granted to the developer July 14, 2005.
Attorney James Jennings, writing on behalf of his clients, first contacted the county in July 2005 informing officials that if they granted a building permit to HNWD they could be violating the Endangered Species Act.
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife]
Turbines fan controversy; Proposed wind farm site is home to endangered wildlife
March 2, 2008 by Lauren Fulbright in The News Leader
March 2, 2008 by Lauren Fulbright in The News Leader
In addition to killing birds, wind turbines at other sites have been found to kill bats, said Rick Lambert, a member of the Virginia Highlands Grotto of the National Speleological Society and local bat enthusiast.
At the Mountaineer Wind Energy Center in West Virginia, 47.5 bats were killed per turbine annually, he said.
In addition to common bats, there are 41 Indiana Bat caves within 50 miles and 23 Virginia Big-eared Bat caves within 30 miles of the proposed wind farm, Lambert said. Both species of bats are endangered and the turbines will be well within their migratory distance, he said.
‘Clean Energy’ Bill Runs Out of Steam; Commerce and Labor Committee pulls plug on Petersen bill
February 21, 2008 by Tom Nash in The Connection
February 21, 2008 by Tom Nash in The Connection
Sen. Chap Petersen’s (D-34) Clean Energy Future bill was wiped from the 2008 legislative agenda last week when the proposal calling for renewable energy sources and reductions in energy consumption was killed in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee on a 3-12 vote.
Senate Bill 446 would have required energy providers to produce 20 percent of their power through renewable resources by 2020. Petersen had touted the initiative heavily during his campaign for the Senate last year.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
Highland wind farm bill blown out of the Senate
February 14, 2008 by Laura Burns in The Hook News Blog
February 14, 2008 by Laura Burns in The Hook News Blog
A bill which would have eased environmental restrictions for a controversial wind farm slated for construction in Highland County has stalled in committee. As previously reported in the Hook, Senate Bill 324, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach), would have exempted all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Zoning/Planning]
Highland wind project largely 'symbolic,' SCC commissioner says
January 31, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
January 31, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
With nearly 19 years under his belt as a commissioner for Virginia's State Corporation Commission, Judge Theodore "Ted" V. Morrison Jr. knows a thing or two about electric utilities. ...Morrison stressed the federal production tax credits are what make commercial wind facilities attractive, but the reality is, the renewable electricity utilities will never substantially change the country's need for larger power plants.
"These things are all taxpayer-subsidized. All those tax credits - we pay for that. People tend to forget that," he says. "Maybe 39 megawatts is important, but good gosh, Virginia Power they'll get 200 megawatts out of one plant - there's a 19,000 megawatt portfolio. (This project) is largely 'symbolic.' I wish people would get realistic about the promise of renewables."
Morrison believes renewable power won't provide enough electricity in this country to make a dent in the need for large utilities, and HNWD's small facility will be a drop in the bucket. Does he think it will make a difference? "I do not," he said.
Also filed under [
General]
Turbines Must Deal With The Birds And The Bats
January 25, 2008 by Hannah Northey in Daily News Record
January 25, 2008 by Hannah Northey in Daily News Record
The environmental impact of Virginia's first wind farm in Highland County could shed light on how successful such farms will be in the Valley, state officials say.
State agencies, led by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, will monitor the Highland New Wind Development LLC's 20 wind turbines to see how federally protected bats and birds are affected.
Biologists are concerned that inland wind farms on the East Coast could kill large numbers of common bats, and possibly affect the federally protected Indiana bat and Virginia big-eared bat, according to the State Corporation Commission.
The commission approved the Highland County project this week but required the developers to study its impact on the animals.
"We still have no experience in Virginia," said Ken Schrad, an SCC spokesman. "The Highland project, with its monitoring and mitigation program, will provide that experience for future projects."
Amid no appeals, plans for wind farm move ahead
January 24, 2008 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
January 24, 2008 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
Plans for Virginia's first wind farm are breezing along, just as demand for wind-generated electricity appears to be going up.
Last month, the State Corporation Commission granted Highland New Wind Development permission to construct and operate up to 20 wind turbines at a mountaintop site.
In recent days, the deadline passed for those who disagree with the decision to appeal. As a result, the company is moving forward on at least two fronts.
Also filed under [
General]
State legislators may soon make life easier for a company looking to build a controversial wind farm in Highland County. A new bill in the General Assembly would exempt certain small electricity-generating facilities from state environmental regulations and requirements, so long as they operate on renewable energy.
Senate bill 234, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) two weeks ago and currently being considered by the Commerce and Labor Committee, would exempt all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts. ...Rick Webb, a senior scientist at UVA and nationally-recognized wind energy expert, believes that the passing of this bill is crucial to the Highland County wind farm's success and that without the bill's passage, Highland New Wind would face potentially devastating repercussions for failing to abide by the Endangered Species Act.
The proposed wind farm's location is in the center of several caves that are home to two species of endangered bats: the Virginia Big-Eared bat and the Indiana bat.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Zoning/Planning]
New rules sought for windmills; Bill would exempt some smaller plans from SCC authority
January 19, 2008 by Rex Springston in Richmond Times-Dispatch
January 19, 2008 by Rex Springston in Richmond Times-Dispatch
A company seeking to build 19 windmills in rural Highland County, amid considerable opposition, fought for more than four years to get local and state approval.
State Sen. Frank W. Wagner, R-Virginia Beach, wants to smooth the path for similar projects that follow.
Under a bill proposed by Wagner, small producers of renewable energy -- those creating 50 megawatts or less -- would be exempt from State Corporation Commission authority. They still would need local approval.
Also filed under [
General]
Feds Oppose Wind Farm; Rockingham Border Location ‘High Risk'
January 15, 2008 by Joan Ashley in Daily News Record
January 15, 2008 by Joan Ashley in Daily News Record
The site of a proposed wind farm on the border of Virginia and West Virginia is inappropriate, federal officials say, due to the potential harm such a project could pose to several endangered species.
That's the opinion of the U.S. Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service in a letter to environmental consultant Western EcoSystems Technology Inc., of Cheyenne, Wyo. ...Fish and Wildlife officials said the agency supports alternative energy production, including wind power, but only when they are "sited and operated to be bird-and-bat friendly."
Also filed under [
West Virginia]
State approves wind plant permit; Residents, supervisors consider next moves
January 3, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
January 3, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
HNWD attorneys Brian Brake and John Flora declined to make any comment on the SCC's decision or answer questions about how the company will proceed from here.
At this point, Bailey said he doubted the SCC would reconsider its permit order. "Legal arguments at the SCC are always edgy, and here, it's so clear how seriously they have taken the environment. The chances (of an appeal) prevailing are remote ... This has set a wonderful precedent for Virginia, and I can't see wind turbines exploding in this state now."
And, before construction can begin, HNWD is required to submit a final site plan. The company cannot do anything, including storing equipment on site, until that site plan is approved. Before HNWD can get a county building permit, it must also file a performance bond. For the first partial year and five subsequent years, that bond must be for $2,500 per turbine tower; for the remaining years, the amount is $6,000 each.
Power In The Breeze; McBride Seeks Funding For Wind Energy Project
December 27, 2007 by Dan Wright in The Daily News Record
December 27, 2007 by Dan Wright in The Daily News Record
Last week, the State Corporation Commission granted conditional approval for the company to build up to 20 turbines, each about 400 feet tall, on Red Oak Knob and Tamarack Ridge near the West Virginia border. ...McBride's project faced considerable opposition from environmentalists.
It was widespread among residents who see Highland County as a pristine rural area and "a sort of last frontier," Sullenberger said.
The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries summarized the opposition in a September 2006 letter to the SCC.
"We support the use of alternative energy sources, including wind energy" the DGIF said. "However, we feel this project presents an unacceptable risk to wildlife."
Highland New Wind chose not to seek a federal permit to protect the wind farm from possible immediate shutdown by government order if an endangered or threatened animal is killed or injured. That's a risk that regulators said the company is free to take if it wishes.
Another battleground was how much Highland New Wind will pay for wildlife measures. Thursday's ruling initially capped monitoring costs at up to $150,000 a year. It capped shutdown-related expenses to benefit wildlife at either $50,000 a year or 0.85 percent of revenue from the prior year, whichever is higher.
Previously released case documents said the project is expected to generate lots of cash long-term. Company financial analysts predicted Highland New Wind could earn an annual profit of $4.2 million after major expenses are paid off in 10 to 15 years. With state approval now in hand, the company said it will begin recruiting investors.
The first wind-powered electric generation project in Virginia will be permitted on the remote ridges of Highland County, the State Corporation Commission said Thursday.
The commission granted conditional approval to Highland New Wind Development's $60 million proposal to place 19 turbines more than 400 feet tall on a 4,400-foot ridge near the West Virginia border.
The company must spend up to $150,000 a year to monitor and mitigate harm to birds and bats that could be caused by the whirling turbine blades, the SCC said. Environmentalists have contended many endangered species would be threatened by the project, and an SCC hearing examiner concluded that the turbines were a "significant risk" to bats and "a lesser risk" to birds.
Dominion Power seeks ideas for green projects
December 17, 2007 by Scott Harper in The Virginian-Pilot
December 17, 2007 by Scott Harper in The Virginian-Pilot
Dominion Virginia Power, the state's largest electric utility, is looking to get greener.
Actually, Dominion must get greener, mostly because of government rules in Virginia and North Carolina that at least 12 percent of the company's energy come from renewable sources by 2022.
Dominion currently draws about 2 percent of its power from green energy supplies, including a large biomass facility in Pittsylvania County and a hydroelectric pumping station in the mountains of Bath County.
To expand its environmental portfolio, the Richmond-based conglomerate is seeking project proposals from entrepreneurs and businesses to provide more renewable energy in the near future. ..."In order to meet one of the fastest-growing demands in the country, we need a very balanced portfolio," he said. That means investing in coal as well as renewables, energy conservation and efficiencies, and nuclear power.
Dominion announced last month that it intends to seek a federal license to build a third reactor at its North Anna nuclear power plant, northwest of Richmond.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
Wind farm may have to monitor bird and bat kills; An SCC officer said wildlife protection outweighs financial concerns
October 18, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in Roanoke Times
October 18, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in Roanoke Times
Backers of a proposed wind farm in Highland County would have to search daily for dead birds and bats and curtail turbine operations to limit loss of animal life under a proposed wildlife-protection plan issued Wednesday by a Virginia State Corporation Commission hearing officer. ...Citing "significant risk" to bats, and "a lesser risk" to birds, Skirpan recommended that backers of the 19-turbine project should pay for monitoring and altering their use, including speed, for the life of the wind farm.
| << Utah | Vermont >> |