News
Category:
Impact on Views and Virginia
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on Landscape
> Impact on Views
(200)
All > Location > USA > Virginia (276)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > Virginia (276)
Any of these categories
West Virginia boundary commission members Charles Sypolt and Curt Keplinger visited Tamarack Ridge Saturday morning to inspect the site of a proposed industrial wind farm. ...Governor Manchin formed the boundary commission in September after the Pocahontas County Commission alerted him that the wind project might encroach into West Virginia territory.
The county commission became concerned after the developer, Highland New Wind Development, LLC (HNWD), issued a site plan with the state line re-plotted on the base topographic map and two turbines very close to the re-plotted state line.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
West Virginia]
State agency reviewing wind developer's analysis
October 16, 2009 by Anne Adams in The Recorder Online
October 16, 2009 by Anne Adams in The Recorder Online
Late last Friday, before a hearing scheduled for Tuesday this week, Highland New Wind Development submitted further analysis of its wind project to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources.
The hearing was set by the State Corporation Commission following a complaint from DHR that a condition attached to HNWD's state permit for Virginia's first wind utility were not being met. DHR said it believed the SCC's condition to "coordinate with DHR for guidance regarding the potential need for archaeological and architectural surveys, recommended studies and field
surveys to evaluate the project's impacts to historic resources," had meaning, and that HNWD was not coordinating with the agency as ordered.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
The SCC had scheduled the hearing on a complaint from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, which had accused Highland New Wind Development of failing to consult with it on how the wind farm will affect the nearby Camp Allegheny battlefield.
But on Friday, Highland New Wind provided two preliminary studies to the Department of Historic Resources, according to a motion filed with the SCC late in the day.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
Virginia to consider visual impact in wind turbine approval
September 29, 2009 by Geoff Hamill in The Pocahontas Times
September 29, 2009 by Geoff Hamill in The Pocahontas Times
The company planning an industrial wind facility on Tamarack Ridge didn't want to talk about visual impact on Camp Allegheny when it seeks approval to build the 19 gigantic turbines.
But a Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) hearing examiner ordered on September 23 that visual impact will be considered when the SCC hears arguments over the company's compliance with permit conditions.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
West Virginia]
SCC gives go-ahead to Highland County wind farm foes
September 24, 2009 by Michael Sluss in Roanoke Times
September 24, 2009 by Michael Sluss in Roanoke Times
State regulators will consider the impact that a planned Highland County wind farm will have on a nearby Civil War battlefield, despite objections from the project's developer.
A State Corporation Commission hearing examiner ruled Wednesday that a state agency could present evidence of the visual impacts the 400-foot-tall towers would have on Camp Allegheny, a historic battlefield just across the state line in West Virginia. A hearing has been set for Oct. 13.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
While Virginia's State Corporation Commission starts hearing legal arguments this week about the actions of Highland New Wind Development, officials and citizens are telling Richmond officials that Camp Allegheny, the nearby battlefield, needs to be protected from the 19-tower project. ...Allegheny is part of an historic and scenic landscape that belongs to the American people Highland New Wind Development may be located in Virginia and Camp Allegheny in West Virginia, but it is the citizens of the entire country who stand to lose if the 400-foot tall, 285 foot wide turbines are allowed to be built where they are currently sited.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
Highland Wind motion denied; Battlefield impacts relevant in Oct. 13 SCC hearing
September 24, 2009 by Anne Adams in The Recorder Online
September 24, 2009 by Anne Adams in The Recorder Online
Highland New Wind Development filed a motion Friday, Sept. 18 to exclude any discussion of Camp Allegheny Battlefield from a state hearing originally set for Wednesday.
Attorneys for HNWD, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, and the State Corporation Commission argued for an hour before SCC hearing examiner Alexander Skirpan in Richmond. Skirpan denied HNWD's motion, and rescheduled the original hearing on DHR's allegations against the developer for Tuesday, Oct. 13.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
Got wind turbines? Helpful website provides custom viewsheds
August 12, 2009 by Geoff Hamill in Pocahontas Times
August 12, 2009 by Geoff Hamill in Pocahontas Times
Giant wind turbines are coming close to Pocahontas County and many residents are curious if the windmills will be visible from their homes.
A helpful website with a strange name lets you find out with just a few clicks of the mouse.
Heywhatsthat.com works in conjunction with Google Maps and provides custom viewsheds from any point on the globe.
Also filed under [
Impact on People|
West Virginia]
State approves wind plant permit; Residents, supervisors consider next moves
January 3, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
January 3, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
HNWD attorneys Brian Brake and John Flora declined to make any comment on the SCC's decision or answer questions about how the company will proceed from here.
At this point, Bailey said he doubted the SCC would reconsider its permit order. "Legal arguments at the SCC are always edgy, and here, it's so clear how seriously they have taken the environment. The chances (of an appeal) prevailing are remote ... This has set a wonderful precedent for Virginia, and I can't see wind turbines exploding in this state now."
And, before construction can begin, HNWD is required to submit a final site plan. The company cannot do anything, including storing equipment on site, until that site plan is approved. Before HNWD can get a county building permit, it must also file a performance bond. For the first partial year and five subsequent years, that bond must be for $2,500 per turbine tower; for the remaining years, the amount is $6,000 each.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on People]