News
Category:
General and Virginia
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> General
(12187)
All > Location > USA > Virginia (276)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > Virginia (276)
Any of these categories
Highland citizens have once again reminded county supervisors of their intent to sue the board if proper conditions are not met by Highland New Wind Development LLC.
In a Feb. 27 letter addressed to the board, county attorney Melissa Dowd, county administrator Roberta Lambert, and zoning administrator Jim Whitelaw, the law firm of Woods Rogers outlined the citizens' expectations based on the conditional use permit granted to the developer July 14, 2005.
Attorney James Jennings, writing on behalf of his clients, first contacted the county in July 2005 informing officials that if they granted a building permit to HNWD they could be violating the Endangered Species Act.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife]
Highland wind project largely 'symbolic,' SCC commissioner says
January 31, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
January 31, 2008 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
With nearly 19 years under his belt as a commissioner for Virginia's State Corporation Commission, Judge Theodore "Ted" V. Morrison Jr. knows a thing or two about electric utilities. ...Morrison stressed the federal production tax credits are what make commercial wind facilities attractive, but the reality is, the renewable electricity utilities will never substantially change the country's need for larger power plants.
"These things are all taxpayer-subsidized. All those tax credits - we pay for that. People tend to forget that," he says. "Maybe 39 megawatts is important, but good gosh, Virginia Power they'll get 200 megawatts out of one plant - there's a 19,000 megawatt portfolio. (This project) is largely 'symbolic.' I wish people would get realistic about the promise of renewables."
Morrison believes renewable power won't provide enough electricity in this country to make a dent in the need for large utilities, and HNWD's small facility will be a drop in the bucket. Does he think it will make a difference? "I do not," he said.
Amid no appeals, plans for wind farm move ahead
January 24, 2008 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
January 24, 2008 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
Plans for Virginia's first wind farm are breezing along, just as demand for wind-generated electricity appears to be going up.
Last month, the State Corporation Commission granted Highland New Wind Development permission to construct and operate up to 20 wind turbines at a mountaintop site.
In recent days, the deadline passed for those who disagree with the decision to appeal. As a result, the company is moving forward on at least two fronts.
New rules sought for windmills; Bill would exempt some smaller plans from SCC authority
January 19, 2008 by Rex Springston in Richmond Times-Dispatch
January 19, 2008 by Rex Springston in Richmond Times-Dispatch
A company seeking to build 19 windmills in rural Highland County, amid considerable opposition, fought for more than four years to get local and state approval.
State Sen. Frank W. Wagner, R-Virginia Beach, wants to smooth the path for similar projects that follow.
Under a bill proposed by Wagner, small producers of renewable energy -- those creating 50 megawatts or less -- would be exempt from State Corporation Commission authority. They still would need local approval.
Power In The Breeze; McBride Seeks Funding For Wind Energy Project
December 27, 2007 by Dan Wright in The Daily News Record
December 27, 2007 by Dan Wright in The Daily News Record
Last week, the State Corporation Commission granted conditional approval for the company to build up to 20 turbines, each about 400 feet tall, on Red Oak Knob and Tamarack Ridge near the West Virginia border. ...McBride's project faced considerable opposition from environmentalists.
It was widespread among residents who see Highland County as a pristine rural area and "a sort of last frontier," Sullenberger said.
The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries summarized the opposition in a September 2006 letter to the SCC.
"We support the use of alternative energy sources, including wind energy" the DGIF said. "However, we feel this project presents an unacceptable risk to wildlife."
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Zoning/Planning]
Wind farm may have to monitor bird and bat kills; An SCC officer said wildlife protection outweighs financial concerns
October 18, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in Roanoke Times
October 18, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in Roanoke Times
Backers of a proposed wind farm in Highland County would have to search daily for dead birds and bats and curtail turbine operations to limit loss of animal life under a proposed wildlife-protection plan issued Wednesday by a Virginia State Corporation Commission hearing officer. ...Citing "significant risk" to bats, and "a lesser risk" to birds, Skirpan recommended that backers of the 19-turbine project should pay for monitoring and altering their use, including speed, for the life of the wind farm.
SCC official recommends monitoring wind energy project for its lifespan
October 18, 2007 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
October 18, 2007 by Anne Adams in The Recorder
Following State Corporation Commission's decision in March to remand the case to its hearing examiner for further review on environmental concerns, months of testimony have been submitted and reviewed.
This week, the hearing examiner, Alexander J. Skirpan, submitted another report to commissioners, this time recommending "robust" monitoring of the potentially adverse impacts to wildlife, for the expected 20-year life of the project. ...Skirpan had previously concluded HNWD's project be approved by the SCC. But commissioners wanted to know what kind of details a monitoring and mitigation plan would include, rather than leaving those issues up to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, and HNWD.
Developers have cleared another hurdle for a wind farm in Highland County. A hearing examiner has asked the State Corporation Commission to approve his recommendations to reduce harm to native birds and bats.
Also filed under [
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats]
The release of a proposed wind energy plant's financial data raises new questions about its environmental options. ...The mistakenly released analysis says the company expects to earn more than $4 million a year after paying off equipment and other startup costs. As is typical for the nascent wind-energy industry, the owners would be able to not only sell the electricity the turbines would produce, but also would make money from government incentives for renewable-energy investors, which include income tax breaks and marketable credits.
Agency to issue rules for turbines; The U.S. Forest Service wants to regulate wind-power machines on federal land.
September 22, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
September 22, 2007 by Jeff Sturgeon in The Roanoke Times
Visitors to the nation's public forests and grasslands could find wind turbines cranking out power for an energy-hungry nation under a proposal to be released any day in Washington, D.C. ...
But Rick Webb, a senior scientist at the University of Virginia, said those wind assets are relatively small. "I'm skeptical that the benefits of development on Appalachian ridges is worth the environmental costs. These ridgelines represent what remains for the most part of our wild landscape," Webb said.
The state Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for development of Virginia's first utility-grade wind farm in Highland County.
Neighboring landowners opposed the project, arguing that its 400-foot-tall turbines would ruin the scenery and endanger migratory birds. In their lawsuit, they claimed county officials failed to follow proper procedures in approving the project.
Bracing for wind in Bath; National forest land may get industry local officials can't control
July 26, 2007 by Charles Garratt in The Recorder
July 26, 2007 by Charles Garratt in The Recorder
As neighboring Highland County continues contentious discussions on commercial wind power, Bath County officials have taken another step toward learning what they can and should do to prepare for more inquiries from the wind industry about developing ridge tops here. Though supervisors and planners agreed they need to plan head, the federal lands making up half the county could mean there's little they can do to prevent the industry from taking hold.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
In yet another round of testimony, the environment played a central role in discussions on how a proposed 39-megawatt industrial wind utility may or may not be harmful to some of the richest and rarest species of wildlife in Virginia.
Tuesday, the courtroom at the State Corporation Commission was host to nearly more lawyers than private citizens. This was the second hearing hosted by the SCC, one requested by commissioners after they remanded Highland New Wind Development's application for a state permit back to their hearing examiner for more information.
Specifically, the SCC wanted to gain a fuller understanding of how damage to species and the environment caused by the 18-20 turbines proposed along the 4,000-foot Allegheny Mountain ridge might be prevented or mitigated were the state to grant a permit for the facility.
And by the end of the day, testimony had not been completed and the hearing examiner ordered a continuation through Wednesday.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
Norfolk Southern sues over its stake in wind power
July 18, 2007 by Gregory Richards in The Power Report
July 18, 2007 by Gregory Richards in The Power Report
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., trying to preserve tax benefits it gained by investing in wind power generation facilities, filed a lawsuit Friday in U.S. District Court in Norfolk against Caithness Western Wind Partners LLC of New York and two related en ities. Caithness wants to sell certain wind power facilities over the objection of Norfolk-based Norfolk Southern, which invested more than $16.1 million with Caithness over the past four years to gain federal tax credits for renewable energy investments, acco ding to the filing. The railroad said its investments were based on the partnership lasting through at least 2011.
Norfolk Southern contends any sale requires its written consent and that, if the transaction goes through, the railroad will have to pay millions of dollars in taxes and would be greatly harmed. It is seeking to block the sale. Michael Cole, an attorney with Caithness Energy LLC, the manager of Caithness Western Wind Partners, did not return calls for comment Tuesday.
Also filed under [
Tax Breaks & Subsidies]
A proposed wind-power project in Highland County goes before the State Corporation Commission today - and opponents are lined up to raise their objections to the developers' plans to place 20 400-foot turbines in Laurel Fork.
"This project is simply a bad investment for the wind industry and a bad precedent for the Commonwealth," said Rick Webb, co-manager of the advocacy group Virginia Wind and co-author of a National Academies report on environmental impacts of wind projects.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
Wind Project Developer Seeks to Avoid Wildlife Protection Measures
July 16, 2007 by VaWind Press Release
July 16, 2007 by VaWind Press Release
Highland New Wind is testifying that it cannot afford the wildlife protections recommended by wildlife agencies, conservation groups, and citizen respondents in the case.
Despite the prospects of government incentives, which would cover the majority of development costs, it remains a marginal project, promising negligible benefits and huge environmental costs.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Zoning/Planning]
MONTEREY - Preparations have been under way for weeks, and this Tuesday, the State Corporation Commission will hold its second evidentiary hearing on what could be Virginia's first industrial wind energy utility.
After months of testimony, the SCC did not reach a decision on whether to grant Highland New Wind Development a state permit to build its facility here atop Allegheny Mountain. Instead, the three commissioners remanded the case back to the SCC hearing examiner with instructions to gather more information, particularly on how to prevent or reduce the 39-megawatt plant's impacts on the environment, and monitor those after construction.
HNWD is expected to call some of the same people it did at the first hearing to rebut testimony of expert witnesses who have spoken on behalf of The Nature Conservancy and Highland citizens opposed to the project.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Zoning/Planning]
Wind, algae projects to tap state money for energy studies
June 30, 2007 by Scott Harper in The Virginian-Pilot
June 30, 2007 by Scott Harper in The Virginian-Pilot
Turning algae into fuel?
Building a windmill on Tangier Island in the middle of the Chesapeake Bay? Setting wind turbines miles off the Virginia Beach coast?
The ideas might sound futuristic, but they are the primary alternative-energy projects that the state will support with $1.5 million in research grants, to be awarded next week.
Also filed under [
Technology|
Tax Breaks & Subsidies]
Frederick County's federal elected representatives are keeping an open mind about a proposed power line that would end in Kemptown.
U.S. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-6) touted the benefits of the proposed twin-500 volt power line that will run through parts of the county in a statement Friday.
"Residents and businesses in the Sixth District expect to have electricity for heat, light and air conditioning when they need it," he said. "In addition to these benefits, an upgraded transmission system could accommodate more renewable energy generation, such as wind or solar power."
The state's two senators, however, were more reserved when discussing the line.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning|
Maryland]
House rejects amendment to stop power lines
June 21, 2007 by Kimberly Hefling, Associated Press in Times Argus
June 21, 2007 by Kimberly Hefling, Associated Press in Times Argus
WASHINGTON - The House rejected a resolution Wednesday that would block government plans to spur construction of major new power lines in many states regardless of local opposition.
The issue has been contentious in parts of the East Coast and in the Southwest, where two high priority transmission corridors for power lines were proposed. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., warned colleagues that unwanted power lines could come to their district.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
USA|
Arizona|
California|
Delaware|
Maryland|
Nevada|
New Jersey|
New York|
Ohio|
Pennsylvania]