News
Category:
Virginia and West Virginia
Browse in :
All
> Location
> USA
> Virginia
(187)
All > Location > USA > West Virginia (211)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > West Virginia (211)
Any of these categories
Is it too expensive to survey historic resources before Virginia's first wind energy plant is constructed? Highland New Wind Development says it would have to fork over between $50,000-$75,000, or more, to do what state officials have been steadily requesting for two years. ...DHR archeologist Roger Kirchen, however, told The Recorder his agency needs the results of these surveys before a review of the project is completed. "The final SCC order directs the applicant to work toward providing us with information," Kirchen said Monday. "The SCC order has the authority. We've exchanged some documents (with HNWD) ... but none of these issues have been resolved. At this point, we're just trying to identify the potential effects."
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People]
Pa. judges recommend against power line
August 23, 2008 by Garren Shipley in Northern Virginia Daily
August 23, 2008 by Garren Shipley in Northern Virginia Daily
Virginia may have given a controversial power line an initial "yes," but Pennsylvania has given it an initial "no."
In a ruling released late Thursday, regulatory judges in Pennsylvania recommended that the state's Public Utilities Commission deny applications from Allegheny Power and Dominion Virginia power to build the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line.
A hearing examiner for the Virginia State Corporation Commission has recommended approval for the controversial power line, but only on the condition that West Virginia and Pennsylvania also sign off on the plan.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Pennsylvania]
Massive power line project not needed, PUC judges say
August 20, 2008 by Rick Stouffer in Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
August 20, 2008 by Rick Stouffer in Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
After reviewing thousands of pages of testimony and comments from numerous public hearings, Judges Mark A. Hoyer and Michael A. Nemec in a 364-page document said Allegheny Energy, through its transmission line subsidiary TrAILCo had "failed to carry the burden of truth" for the entire 240-mile project.
"Based on our review of the entire record, we have concluded that little or no need for reinforcement in the Prexy service area presently exists," the judges wrote.
Also filed under [
General|
Pennsylvania]
They're up and they're spinning. Dozens of wind turbines in Grant County are generating electricity, though they haven't been without problems.
Crossing into Virginia, there's a proposal for about 130 wind turbines to be built in the George Washington National Forest, as well as a much smaller operation in Highland County. However, these projects haven't developed without some strong opposition.
The process takes years. Now, phase one is almost complete, 80 turbines are spinning in Mount Storm, West Virginia. Still, some local homeowners, like Bruce Halgren, are challenging the project in court.
Also filed under [
General]
Wind can be strong or weak, consistent or unreliable, sufficient to support wind generation or not. It all depends on location. Local support for wind can also be strong or weak, consistent or unreliable, sufficient or insufficient to support wind generation. It, too, depends on location.
About 200 people from across Virginia converged at JMU for the second annual VWEC symposium on wind energy and their interest in the industry was about the only thing they had in common. Most, but not all, supported wind power development. And not all those in favor were willing to accept wind energy unconditionally.
Also filed under [
General|
Pennsylvania]
People in Shenandoah County had the opportunity to hear both sides of the wind turbine debate Tuesday night at a public forum. They turned out to learn more about what potential impacts, good and bad, the turbines would have.
Impacts to land, wildlife, and the local economy are just a few of the considerations. ...
After about two hours, people left with much to consider.
"Both of them brought up good points," says Kelley. "And, it's just something that I think is going to take some time to absorb everything."
Also filed under [
General]
A community forum on the pros and cons of wind turbines along the Virginia-West Virginia border will be held tonight at Peter Muhlenberg Middle School in Woodstock. ...The discussion was triggered in March by a proposal by FreedomWorks LLC, a renewable-energy firm from Harpers Ferry, W.Va., to study the impact of constructing 130 440-foot wind turbines in George Washington National Forest, said Rosemary Wallinger, chairman of the Forum.
Freedom Works requested the Federal Aviation Administration look into the plan. The FAA is one of the regulatory bodies involved in wind farm proposals. The proposal also would need the approval of the U.S. Forest Service.
Also filed under [
General]
Hampshire commissioners asked to reverse opposition to power line
May 7, 2008 by Mona Ridder in Cumberland Times-News
May 7, 2008 by Mona Ridder in Cumberland Times-News
Apparently hoping that a proposed agreement between the staff of the West Virginia Public Service Commission and Allegheny Energy would put a better face on the utility's proposed Trans-Allegheny Interstate Power Line project, the Hampshire County Commission received an e-mail request to reverse its opposition to the project.
Commissioners Don Cookman, Steve Slonaker and Robert Hott, however, all agreed that would not happen.
Blowing in the wind: Alternative energy may be on horizon for Shenandoah Valley
April 9, 2008 by Susan Beaver Thompson and Arthur James Maas in Shenandoah Valley-Herald
April 9, 2008 by Susan Beaver Thompson and Arthur James Maas in Shenandoah Valley-Herald
Freedom Works is planning the project to span the ridge line running along the border between Va. and West Va. The line runs from approximately five miles north of Woodstock to about five miles South of Mount Jackson, along the Western horizon. This would cover eighteen miles of ridgeline, in two states (Virginia and West Virginia), and three counties (Hardy in West Virginia, and Shenandoah and Rockingham in
Virginia.)
The timeline for the project runs from as short as a two-year, permit-gathering phase (followed by one to two years of construction) to a completion date as far off as the year 2040. When asked about a reported 2010 completion date for the project, Jim Smalls, district ranger for the Lee Ranger District within which the project is being planned, simply said, "I find that optimistic."
Area site is touted for wind turbines; W.Va. company says Shenandoah Mountain good fit
April 1, 2008 by Preston Knight in Northern Virginia Daily
April 1, 2008 by Preston Knight in Northern Virginia Daily
Shenandoah Mountain is fit with high-quality breezes and a location near population centers, a necessary combination for wind farms such as the one being sought by a West Virginia firm, a wind expert said. ...Politicians will have their say, too, if the local project moves forward. Del. Todd Gil-bert, R-Woodstock, said his office would be making inquiries soon, but that more knowledge of wind energy is needed before he can form an opinion on it.
"I'm one of the biggest proponents for trying to get off the dependence on oil," he said, "but the fact of the matter is, the most cost-efficient energy sources we have are traditional ones, not alternative ones."
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Zoning/Planning]
Wind project for GWNF would extend into Hardy County
March 26, 2008 by Joan Ashley in The InterMountain
March 26, 2008 by Joan Ashley in The InterMountain
The 131 turbines, each 440 feet tall, would cover 18 miles of ridgecrest, according to private consultant D. Daniel Boone, a conservation biologist and policy analyst.
Ninety turbines would be located in Virginia with the other 41 in Hardy County, according to Boone.
Boone prepared a map stipulating each turbine based upon the coordinates provided in the 7460-1 applications filed with the Federal Aviation Agency by an unknown developer.
"Each wind turbine has a separate 7460-1 application filed with FAA," Boone said.
Also filed under [
General]
Valley targeted for wind turbines; Unidentified firm seeks to build in national forests
March 26, 2008 by Preston Knight in Northern Virginia Daily
March 26, 2008 by Preston Knight in Northern Virginia Daily
But the fact that interest is out there for such a project is a sign of things to come, said Rick Webb, operator of www.vawind.org and a senior scientist with the environmental sciences department at the University of Virginia.
"This is probably the tip of the iceberg," he said.
Eighteen miles of national forest ridgeline, most of which is on Shenandoah Mountain, stands to be affected by the proposal, Webb said.
"It's industrializing our national forest," he said. "The question is whether it's worth the trade-off. In my conclusion, it is not. The electricity produced is just a drop in the bucket."
Also filed under [
General]
Is a wind farm in the Valley's future?; Proposed site would include 130 turbines
March 26, 2008 by Joan Ashley and Hannah Northey in The Daily Reporter
March 26, 2008 by Joan Ashley and Hannah Northey in The Daily Reporter
A renewable energy firm hopes to build 130 wind turbines on Shenandoah Mountain in the George Washington National Forest, including sections of Rockingham and Shenandoah counties and Hardy County, W.Va.
Last week, FreedomWorks LLC, based in Harpers Ferry, W.Va., asked the Federal Aviation Administration to study the impact of building wind turbines up to 440 feet high along the mountain on the border between Virginia and West Virginia. ...The project, which may not see construction for two to three years, would be the company's first proposal on public land, Williamson said.
Proposals for wind farms in the Valley are whipping up opposing viewpoints about the structures' effects on wildlife, local vistas and energy production.
Opponents say the turbines, each hundreds of feet tall, would mar the local landscape and endanger bats and birds, some of which are federally protected.
But proponents say the farms can be built with minimum impact on the environment to offer clean, alternative energy and a break from the nation's dependency on foreign oil. ...After studying maps and coordinates provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, consultant D. Daniel Boone, a conservation biologist and policy analyst, said the FreedomWorks' project could negatively affect untouched areas of the George Washington National Forest.
"Other than a power line and one small road which crosses between Hardy and Shenandoah counties, the project area is completely undisturbed forest with no sign of logging roads or clear-cuts," Boone stated.
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife]
Company begins filing initial turbine applications
March 25, 2008 by Carlos Santos in Richmond Times-Dispatch
March 25, 2008 by Carlos Santos in Richmond Times-Dispatch
An unnamed company has started the application process to build 131 of the massive wind turbines in the national forest in Rockingham County and along the border between Virginia's Shenandoah County and Hardy County in West Virginia.
"We're in the pre-application stage" with the company proposing to build the turbines, Chris Rose, a spokesman for the George Washington & Jefferson National Forests, said Monday. Rose declined to name the company, citing its early application status, which allows the federal agency to keep the name confidential.
Also filed under [
General]
Local governments in western Virginia are beginning to craft land-use regulations to give them tighter control over where wind turbines could be built, even as energy companies study the area's potential for large wind farms.
Mountainous Bland and Bath counties are looking to develop ordinances governing wind turbines. Giles County, meanwhile, recently created a permit process that allows farmers and landowners to build and operate single turbines; but the permit process does not open the door wider for commercial wind farms. The permit process is similar to ones adopted by Pulaski and Rockingham counties. ...The prospect of more money did not persuade Patrick County officials to embrace wind farms. Last year, amid hue and cry from landowners after a Pennsylvania company's proposal to build 20 giant turbines several hundred feet high in Patrick, county supervisors adopted an ordinance banning structures of more than 100 feet high. The company dropped its proposal.
Also filed under [
Zoning/Planning]
Feds Oppose Wind Farm; Rockingham Border Location ‘High Risk'
January 15, 2008 by Joan Ashley in Daily News Record
January 15, 2008 by Joan Ashley in Daily News Record
The site of a proposed wind farm on the border of Virginia and West Virginia is inappropriate, federal officials say, due to the potential harm such a project could pose to several endangered species.
That's the opinion of the U.S. Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service in a letter to environmental consultant Western EcoSystems Technology Inc., of Cheyenne, Wyo. ...Fish and Wildlife officials said the agency supports alternative energy production, including wind power, but only when they are "sited and operated to be bird-and-bat friendly."
AEP gets several bids for wind power
May 8, 2007 by George Hohmann, business editor in Charleston Daily Mail
May 8, 2007 by George Hohmann, business editor in Charleston Daily Mail
American Electric Power has received more than a dozen bids from companies offering to construct wind farms under long-term power purchase agreements, spokeswoman Jeri Matheney said.
"We're very pleased with the response that we got, and the variety," Matheney said. "We got quite a few bids - more than a dozen - from several states.
"It will take at least a few weeks to pore through and analyze all of them," she said. "Then we'll go from there in making our decision."
U.S. proposal could lead to corridor for electricity
April 27, 2007 by Anthony DePalma in New York Times
April 27, 2007 by Anthony DePalma in New York Times
he United States Department of Energy issued a proposal yesterday that could reopen the way for a 190-mile high-voltage transmission line through central New York that state and local officials tried to block last year.
The department declared a multistate area from West Virginia to upstate New York a "National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor," where congestion of existing power lines makes the electricity grid unreliable and subject to blackouts.
AEP, synonymous with coal, wants more wind power
April 5, 2007 by George Hohmann, Business Editor in Charleston Daily Mail
April 5, 2007 by George Hohmann, Business Editor in Charleston Daily Mail
American Electric Power announced it wants to enter long-term purchase agreements for 1,000 megawatts of wind energy, including up to 360 megawatts for its eastern United States service territory - where coal has traditionally been king.
The utility giant said it wants to add the wind energy by 2011 as part of its strategy to address greenhouse gas emissions.
On Tuesday the company issued a request for proposals seeking up to 260 megawatts of wind energy for its Appalachian Power unit. Appalachian serves more than 900,000 customers in southern West Virginia, Virginia and Tennessee.
The company also issued a request for proposals seeking up to 100 megawatts of wind energy for its Indiana Michigan Power unit.
The deadline for bids is April 30, with delivery to begin by the end of 2008.