Documents
Category:
Impact on Wildlife
Note: counts do not include items in sub-categories
|
The Cape Cod Commission (CCC) has asserted that the Cape Wind energy project qualifies as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) under Section 12(i) and 13(b) of the Cape Cod Commission Act. The CCC staff report can be accessed from this page.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Impact on Economy|
Massachusetts]
Comments submitted to Santa Barbara County Energy Division, California, by the Environmental Defense Center (EDC) regarding the draft environmental impact report (DEIR) for the Lompac Wind Energy Project.
Army Corps letter to Sheffield Wind regarding individual wetlands permit application
August 23, 2007
by Curtis L. Thalken
Army Corps' letter to UPC Wind states that the Sheffield Wind project "is not eligible for authorization under the VT General Permit, and must be reviewed under the individual permit review procedure." The letter further states that UPC Wind "may not proceed with any proposed work within our jurisdiction until you have received written authorization from this office." The full letter can be accessed by clicking on the link below.
HMANA Industrial wind turbine siting and monitoring policy
July 8, 2007
by Hawk Migration Association of North America
The following policy update was adopted by the HMANA Board of Directors on July 8, 2008.
Juniata Valley Audubon position on industrial wind development in Blair County, PA
June, 2007
by Stan Kotala, M.D., President, Juniata Valley Audubon
The below is the Juniata Valley Audubon's statement of position on industrial wind energy development in Blair County, PA.
Results of bat and bird mortality at the expanded Buffalo Mountain windfarm, 2005
June 28, 2007
by J. K. Fiedler, T. H. Henry, R. D. Tankersley, and C. P. Nicholson for Tennessee Valley Authority
The post-construction bird/bat mortality survey at the expanded Buffalo Mountain windfarm found an adjusted bat mortality rate of 63.9 bats/turbine/year. This figure is similar in magnitude to the bat mortality recorded in West Virginia (47.5 bats/turbine/year). Fewer bird strikes were recorded in this same survey.
Maple Ridge Wind Power Avian and Bat Fatality Study Year One Report FINAL REPORT
June 25, 2007
by Aaftab Jain et al, Curry and Kerlinger, LLC
The following report describes the research design, initiation and completion of the first
year of postconstruction study (fall migration only) of avian and bat collision fatalities at the 120 turbine
Maple Ridge Wind Power Project in Lewis County, New York.
The work was conducted in accordance with the “Proposed Scope of Work for a Postconstruction Avian and Bat Fatality Study at the Maple Ridge Wind Power Project, Lewis County, New York” dated March 14, 2006, and agreed upon in mid-May 2006, after several revisions. People/agencies who reviewed the proposed scope of work included staffers from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE), Environmental Design and Research (EDR), NYS DEC staffers, developers (PPM and Horizon), and others. Representatives from some or all of these groups have been included in a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which has the responsibility of reviewing and commenting on progress reports, annual reports, and other updates from this project.
The work was conducted in accordance with the “Proposed Scope of Work for a Postconstruction Avian and Bat Fatality Study at the Maple Ridge Wind Power Project, Lewis County, New York” dated March 14, 2006, and agreed upon in mid-May 2006, after several revisions. People/agencies who reviewed the proposed scope of work included staffers from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE), Environmental Design and Research (EDR), NYS DEC staffers, developers (PPM and Horizon), and others. Representatives from some or all of these groups have been included in a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which has the responsibility of reviewing and commenting on progress reports, annual reports, and other updates from this project.
WV PSC Order to deny Liberty Gap wind project
June 22, 2007
by West Virginia Public Service Commission
By the reasons set forth in this order of Jun 22, 2007, the West Virginia Pubic Service Commission refused to issue a siting certificate to Liberty Gap Wind Force, LLC (Liberty Gap) to construct a wind turbine electric generating facility (Project) in Pendleton County, West Virginia. The applicant, US Wind Force, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, had proposed constructing up to 50 wind turbines. The total output of the project would be up to 125 megawatts.
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
West Virginia]
Wind turbines and birds in Flanders (Belgium): Preliminary summary of the mortality research results
June 19, 2007
by Joris Everaert and Eckhart Kuijken
The Research Institute for Nature and Forest currently performs a long-term project to study the impact of land-based wind turbines on birds (nature) and to act as a consultancy for proposed wind farms in Flanders. The project started in 2000, under the authority of the Flemish government. Preliminary study results of the monitoring were presented in Everaert et al. (2002), Everaert (2003), Everaert & Stienen (2006) and Everaert (2006 a, b). A ‘Bird 2 Atlas’ with important bird areas and migration routes in Flanders was also made available (Everaert et al. 2003). In 2007, a comprehensive report will be published with the monitoring results from 2002-2006 and further recommendations (Everaert 2007). A new article for a
scientific journal will follow. Also advice on the establishment of off-shore windfarms has been prepared.
Also filed under [
Impact on Birds|
Europe]
Comments: Statewide Guidelines for Reducing Wildlife Impacts from Wind Energy Development (Docket No. 06-011-1)
June 18, 2007
by Dan Boone
Comments submitted to the California Energy Commission regarding proposed guidelines for conducting post-construction bird-bat mortality surveys at wind energy facilities. These comments were submitted by Dan Boone, a wildlife biologist with over 30 years professional experience.
| << Technology | Impact on Landscape >> |