Documents
Category:
Impact on Wildlife
Note: counts do not include items in sub-categories
|
Comments pertaining to the accuracy and completeness of the Kittitas Valley Wind farm Project DEIS
December, 2003
by Michael H. and Elizabeth F. Robertson
This document [DEIS] has not provided any demonstrable public need for the insignificant amount of power this facility is capable of producing. No valid, compelling local (or even statewide) economic reasons were offered to potentially offset the overwhelming negative impacts that will result if built.
This DEIS is abundant in quantity, but extremely lacking in quality of scientific analysis and entirely deficient in analysis in certain areas. Various mitigations offered are unacceptable or unworkable.
The following are areas of analysis that were either deficient or not performed at all:............
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Impact on Economy|
Zoning/Planning|
Washington]
Wind turbines to produce electricity on a large scale – “wind farms” – are currently being proposed for parts of Tug Hill. Large-scale wind farms are a relatively new occurrence in the Northeast, and since they are new there are many questions that do not have clear answers.
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Zoning/Planning|
New York]
correspondence on Bat Kill re. Meyersdale Windplant
October 29, 2003
by Michael R. Gannon, Ass. Professor, Penn State University
Dear Mr. Boone:
I am in receipt of the information you sent regarding the Meyersdale wind project and the risk to bats, specifically Indiana bats in that area and your request for my opinion on this project. I have also done some research on my own concerning wind turbines and its affects on bats, to determine what data are available in the scientific literature in this area. I base this opinion on data and scientific literature, and my 16 years experience studying bat biology and bat ecology.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats|
Pennsylvania]
This graphic shows the relationship between the height of turbines and the collision threat to nocturnal migrants at the Chautauqua Wind Farm, NY, in the Fall of 2003. A companion graphic included in the NWW photo gallery depicts this threat to noctural migrants in the Spring of 2003.
New Jersey Audubon Society (NJAS) and its 20,000 members generally support environmentally-responsible renewable energy sources, such as wind power, photovoltaic cells, geothermal and hydro-fuel cells. Because traditional energy sources contribute to global climate change, habitat change and degradation, smog pollution, mercury contamination in our waterways, and radioactive waste, NJAS recognizes the importance of developing emission-free sources of energy. However, we are concerned about the potential impacts of these developing technologies on wildlife, and natural habitats.
Groups Call for Review of Wind Power Wildlife Impacts
June 24, 2003
by Meyer & Glitzenstein, a public- interest law firm in Washington D.C., in press release for Defenders of Wildlife et al
More than 25 national and regional conservation groups, including Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon Society, the Humane Society of the United States, and the Endangered Species Coalition, today called on Interior Secretary Gale Norton and other federal officials to assess the impacts of planned extensive wind power development on Appalachian mountain ridges on migratory birds, before these projects are constructed. In a letter to Secretary Norton and others, the groups cited documented bird kills by existing wind turbines in the region, and urged the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to develop appropriate criteria for siting and construction of these facilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which makes it illegal to kill migratory birds.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
USA]
USF&WS Letter to Nebraska Public Power District re. Possible Threats Posed by Ainsworth Wind Plant to Wildlife
April 18, 2003
by Steve Anschutz, Nebraska Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
The attached pdf file contains a letter written by Steve Anschutz, Nebraska Field Supervisor of the USF&WS, to Rockford Plettner, Environmental Specialist Water/Natural Resources of Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD). The letter responds to a NPPD request for input regarding the possible construction of a wind farm south of Ainsworth, Brown County, Nebraska. The letter's comments are provided as technical assistance and predevelopment consultation....
This graphic shows the relationship between the height of turbines and the collision threat to nocturnal migrants at the Chautauqua Wind Farm, NY, in the Spring of 2003. A companion graphic included in the NWW photo gallery depicts this threat to noctural migrants in the Fall of 2003.
Policy Comments on Point Petre Commercial Wind Turbine Generating Plant
January 13, 2002
by Archives & Collections Society, Ontario
The development of commercial wind power that is currently fashionable is potentially misguided, ineffective and neither environmentally nor socially benign; but it is the right of citizens of rural areas to enjoy both clean and safe energy generation and an unspoiled countryside.
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Impact on Economy|
Energy Policy|
Canada]
Potential Impact of Wind Turbines On Birds at North Cape, Price Edward Island
December 13, 2001
by Andrea Kingsley & Becky Whittam for the Price Edward Island Energy Corporation
As the demand for clean energy increases, wind power generating stations are being constructed across Canada.....concerns have been raised about the possible environmental impact of these turbines on birds, especially after endangered raptors were observed being injured and killed after flying into wind turbines in California.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats|
Canada]
| << Technology | Impact on Landscape >> |