Documents
Category:
Impact on Wildlife and Pennsylvania
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on Wildlife
(101)
All > Location > USA > Pennsylvania (31)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > Pennsylvania (31)
Any of these categories
US Fish and Wildlife Service letter to Gamesa regarding Shaffer Mountain (PA) wind energy proposal
December 19, 2007
by David Densmore, Supervisor US FWS
US Fish and Wildlife Service responded to Gamesa Energy USA in regard to whether an “Incidental take” permit could be granted for the Shaffer Mountain wind project proposed for Somerset County, PA. An “Incidental take” permit allows for the destruction of federally listed species. A subset of the letter is included on this page. The full letter, in PDF format, can be accessed by clicking on the link below.
Letter to Mayor Kilmartin by Dr. Michael Gannon, biology professor at Penn State Altoona
November 4, 2007
by Dr. Michael Gannon
Letter to Tyrone Mayor James Kilmartin in response to Mayor Kilmartin's request for community input on a potential wind facility. Gamesa is proposing to erect 10-15 wind turbines on borough property located on Ice Mountain for a total of 25 units on the ridge tops in the area.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats]
Pennsylvania Biological Survey position statement re: wind power development on public lands
September 13, 2007
by Pennsylvania Biological Survey
... because wind energy development has associated environmental costs, wind energy development should only be instituted on state lands if the environmental benefits can be demonstrated to exceed the environmental costs. ... The environmental benefits of wind energy development, in the mid-Atlantic area in general and on Pennsylvania state lands in particular, are small relative to the negative consequences, which include habitat fragmentation and mortality to birds and bats.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
Juniata Valley Audubon position on industrial wind development in Blair County, PA
June, 2007
by Stan Kotala, M.D., President, Juniata Valley Audubon
The below is the Juniata Valley Audubon's statement of position on industrial wind energy development in Blair County, PA.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape]
Biological Survey responds to PA Game Commission wind energy voluntary cooperation agreement
May 31, 2007
by Pennsylvania Biological Survey
This report, authored by the Wind Energy and Bats subcommittee to the Pennsylvania Biological Survey's (PaBS) Mammal Technical Committee, documents the PA Game Commission's direct side-stepping of a long-established memorandum of agreement with the PaBS when the Game Commission developed and finalized the Wind Energy Voluntary Cooperation Agreement without the review or input of the Biological Survey. The memorandum of agreement was created over 10 years ago to help ensure that the Game Commission obtained advice from experts about actions affecting the mammals inhabiting the Commonwealth.
Also filed under [
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats]
Bird and Bat Studies Conducted at Proposed or Existing Windpower Facilities
February, 2007
by Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
This document includes studies in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia and West Virginia.
Also filed under [
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats|
Maryland|
Maine|
Minnesota|
New Hampshire|
New York|
Virginia|
Vermont|
West Virginia]
Throwing Caution to the Wind: the growing threat of Industrial Wind Energy Development in Pennsylvania to Wildlife, Habitat and Public Lands
October 1, 2006
by Dan Boone
This is a comprehensive, well documented and thoughtful presentation on a wide range of industrial wind issues by Dan Boone, Consulting Conservation Biologist, at the public meeting held by Save Our Allegheny Ridges in Bedford, PA on September 18, 2006
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Noise|
Impact on Economy|
Property Values|
Tax Breaks & Subsidies|
Tourism|
USA]
Wind Power in Pennsylvania: It Isn’t Easy Being Green
July, 2005
by Brian P. Mangan and Joseph G. Rish, Environmental Program Political Science Department King’s College
The generation of electricity by wind is a growing industry in Pennsylvania. While wind energy is certainly an attractive alternative to the pollution produced by fossil fuel power plants, all potential environmental impacts must be measured if electricity produced this way is to truly qualify as “green energy.” Surprisingly, only minimal environmental studies need to be done to site a wind farm in Pennsylvania. Improper siting of some wind farms in the U.S. has impacted migratory bird, resident bird, and bat populations. We present bird-impaction data from an industrial facility 30 km south of a proposed wind farm in Luzurne County, Pennsylvania, that suggest caution in the blind embrace of this energy technology. Siting decisions are made at the local government levels and are primarily based on economic incentives. We argue (a) that this energy alternative must incorporate robust site-specific impaction studies at each wind farm to demonstrate effects throughout the Commonwealth, and (b) that local government officials be given the guidance necessary to encourage and provide environmental oversight to wind farms in their areas.