Documents
Category:
Impact on People and New York
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on People
(107)
All > Location > USA > New York (91)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > New York (91)
Any of these categories
CTA summary of findings on preconstruction noise studies, Clayton Wind Farm Project
August 24, 2008
by Gregory C. Tocci and William J. Elliot
Cavanaugh Tocci Associates (CTA) was hired by the Town of Clayton NY to review the noise analysis prepared by Iberdrola/PPM for the Clayton wind farm project. CTA's report was delivered to the town on February 15, 2008 but refused by the Town Board with objections that the report was too technical. CTA was asked to prepare an executive summary of their report. The executive summary of the report can be accessed by clicking on the link below. To date, the town has refused to release the full CTA report to the residents of Clayton or to the Planning Board.
Also filed under [
Noise]
At a special meeting of the Prattsburgh, NY town board, the Board members voted 3-2 to authorize the commencement of eminent domain proceedings against landowners unwilling to sign easement agreements with UPC Wind (First Wind), a private wind energy developer seeking to erect 36 turbines across forty-eight properties town. The draft minutes of that meeting along with the resolution can be accessed by clicking on the link below.
Mr. DeWayne Wilkie of Jefferson County, NY was seen by a cardiologist in March 2008. Dr. Carroll Moody assessed Mr. Wilkie's health and from a cardiovascular standpoint, declared Mr. Wilkie 'stable'. Dr. Moody also includes information in the report on how wind turbine noise might affect the pace maker inserted in Mr. Wilkie's chest.
In this letter to residents of Burke, NY, Dr. Nina Pierpont briefly discusses her findings of health impacts on families living in proximity to industrial-scale wind turbines.
Ironworkers Local 33 Letter to Steuben County NY IDA
September 21, 2007
by Gary Swanson and Michael Altonberg
This letter was sent to the Steuben County (NY) IDA in response to UPC Wind's decision to hire outside contractors and construction workers to erect the Cohocton Wind facility.
Also filed under [
Impact on Economy]
Evaluation of Environmental Shadow Flicker: Analysis for “Dutch Hill Wind Power Project”
January 30, 2007
by R.H. Bolton
Two industrial wind turbine farms are proposed by parent UPC Wind Partners for the
town of Cohocton, NY and will permanently alter the town. The large blades on MW
scale turbines can at certain times produce moving shadows on the landscape or create
distracting flicker on the scenery. To capture the wind these turbines are to be installed
on hilltops around the town and thus have significant potential to create a shadow flicker
nuisance at great distances from the turbines. All environmental effects of projects
require consideration and possible mitigation. Siting selection is important since wind
turbines are a permanent installation and may significantly impair resident’s enjoyment
of neighboring lands or even personal health.
Evaluation of Environmental Noise Analysis for “Dairy Hills Wind Farm”
October 16, 2006
by R.H. Bolton
Industrial wind turbine farms are proposed for the towns of Perry, Covington and
Warsaw, NY that will permanently alter the towns. Large turbines create strong noise
levels not only from wind through the blades but largely by the turbine mechanisms
themselves. To capture the wind these turbines are to be installed on hill tops around the
town and thus have significant potential to create a noise nuisance. Wind turbine noise
added to the prevailing ambient background sound is an important environmental
consideration when siting wind turbines since they are a permanent installation and may
significantly impair resident’s enjoyment of neighboring lands or even personal health.
Also, relevant consideration of noise impacts and mitigation measures are a specific
requirement of a NY State Environmental Quality Review procedure, required before
approval of permits.
Because time seems to be running out on fossil fuels and the lure of
non-polluting windpower is so seductive, some people are now promoting windpower
initiatives at any cost, without investigating potential negative consequences-- and with
no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental history......Throughout my experience, I could not substantiate a single claim developers made for
industrial wind energy, including the one justifying its existence: that massive wind
installations would meaningfully reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. When you
understand this, you realize the wind business is not really that complex. But there are a
lot of complicated issues swirling around it that obscure and distract from this main point,
issues such as global warming, property values, the nature of wind leases, local revenues
and taxes, wildlife, natural views, and a host of others. So how does one know the truth of
it all? How does one go about separating the reality from spin?
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats|
Noise|
Impact on Economy|
Property Values|
Tax Breaks & Subsidies]
Shadow-Flicker Modeling- Dairy Hills Wind Farm (NY)
June 14, 2006
by Arne Nielsen, Wind Engineers, Inc
Prepared for Horizon Wind Energy by Wind Engineers, Inc
Public Health and Safety: Deficiencies of the New York State Department of State Presentation to Local Officials Concerning Wind Turbines
May, 2006
by Dr. Kenneth Jaffe, Delhi (NY)
Dr, Kenneth Jaffe's response to the health and safety content of a June 2006 presentation by the NY State Department of State (DOS) in Delware County, NY.
The DOS presentation, which included a discussion of the impact of industrial turbine projects on communities and individuals, is intended to guide local officials in the process of writing regulations. Dr. Jaffe's response addresses what he believes are substantive misstatements, mischaracterizations, biased emphasis and faulty data contained in the DOS presentation.
The DOS presentation, which included a discussion of the impact of industrial turbine projects on communities and individuals, is intended to guide local officials in the process of writing regulations. Dr. Jaffe's response addresses what he believes are substantive misstatements, mischaracterizations, biased emphasis and faulty data contained in the DOS presentation.