Documents
Category:
Energy Policy and California
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Energy Policy
(193)
All > Location > USA > California (21)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > California (21)
Any of these categories
California ISO integration of renewable resources report (Draft)
August, 2007
by CA-ISO, GE Energy Consulting, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, AWS Truewind
This report details transmission and operating issues and recommendations for integrating renewable resources on the CAISO Control Grid. The CAISO discusses the gross variations in electric production from wind energy due to the intermittent nature of the resource. During periods of highest demand, the winds drop off.
Also filed under [
General|
Technology]
California’s Greenhouse Gas Policies: Local Solutions to a Global Problem?
March, 2007
by James Bushnell, Carla Peterman, Catherine Wolfram
California is in the process of implementing a broad portfolio of policies and regulations
aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This paper summarizes the initiatives likely
to impact the electricity generating sector. We present calculations showing that there is
a substantial risk that two of the most prominent policies could simply result in a
reshuffling, on paper, of the electricity generating resources within the West that are
dedicated to serving California. This reshuffling is different from the conventional
leakage problem as it involves no physical changes to the way electricity is generated
across regulated and unregulated regions, but is instead driven by a contractual
reshuffling of who buys power from whom. The problem is similar to an ineffective
consumer boycott. The problem is still present but less severe if more Western states
adopt carbon limitations. We also show that some of the least market-based initiatives,
the renewable portfolio standards (RPS), are likely to have the biggest near-term impact
on the carbon-intensity of electricity generation in the West. Thus the scale of RPS
programs may be limiting the potential role of non-renewable options in reducing carbon
emissions from the electricity sector.
Less For More: The Rube Goldberg Nature of Industrial Wind Development
December 20, 2006
by Jon Boone, Oakland (MD)
Rube Goldberg would admire the utter purity of the pretensions of wind technology in
pursuit of a safer modern world, claiming to be saving the environment while wreaking
havoc upon it. But even he might be astonished by the spin of wind industry spokesmen.
Consider the comments made by the American Wind Industry Association.s Christina
Real de Azua in the wake of the virtual nonperformance of California.s more than 13,000
wind turbines in mitigating the electricity crisis precipitated by last July.s .heat storm..
.You really don.t count on wind energy as capacity,. she said. .It is different from other
technologies because it can.t be dispatched.. (84) The press reported her comments
solemnly without question, without even a risible chortle. Because they perceive time to
be running out on fossil fuels, and the lure of non-polluting wind power is so seductive,
otherwise sensible people are promoting it at any cost, without investigating potential
negative consequences-- and with no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental
history or grid operations.
Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened policy.
Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened policy.
Also filed under [
General|
Technology|
Pollution|
Tax Breaks & Subsidies|
Zoning/Planning|
USA|
Maryland|
Denmark|
Germany|
Canada]
Why energy conservation trumps windmills
January, 2005
by Eleanor Tillinghast in the Hill Country Observer
If you really want to cut energy consumption, reduce pollution, improve public health and protect our environment, it’s time to contact your elected officials, educate them about the lessons of Denmark, Germany and elsewhere, and tell them you want tougher energy efficiency measures instead of wind power plants.
Otherwise, in the next few years, you’ll be looking at wind turbines in some of your favorite places, with the knowledge that they’re doing little more than funneling your tax dollars to a few lucky corporations and landowners, and away from better solutions.
Otherwise, in the next few years, you’ll be looking at wind turbines in some of your favorite places, with the knowledge that they’re doing little more than funneling your tax dollars to a few lucky corporations and landowners, and away from better solutions.
This report illustrates how a typical ISO might assess the capacity value of energy sources within an energy portfolio and the negligible capacity value accorded industrial wind.