Documents
Category:
General and Australia / New Zealand
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> General
(296)
All > Location > Australia / New Zealand (28)
Any of these categories
All > Location > Australia / New Zealand (28)
Any of these categories
The agreement is entered into between a landowner and Wind Power Pty Ltd when wind turbines are erected on the land.
This agreement entered into between the landowner and Wind Power Pty Ltd permits the developer to site a wind testing tower on the land. A minimum fee is paid the landowner.
The agreement entered into between landowners and Wind Power Pty Ltd permitting Wind Power Pty Ltd permits the developer to take a lease over the land at any time. The agreement reads like an option to lease but no option fee is paid a landowner for signing the agreement.
Mr. Sean Cox presented evidence at the Resource Management Act hearing for the Te Uku wind farm which directly countered the economic case for the wind farm, its carbon emissions justification, the available wind resource at Te Uku, adverse noise and health effects, and challenged the expertise of some of wind developer Wel's consultants. When completed, Wel counsel Simon Berry asked that the hearing be adjourned to permit the developer time to respond to Mr. Cox's submission. An excerpt of Mr. Cox's testimony is included below. The full transcript can be accessed by clicking on one of the two links provided.
Last December some electrical power generation information for the Wonthaggi wind farm came my way. The information provides the power produced, or used, each hour for each of the 6 turbines between 1 June 06 and 22 June 06. Although it is for a limited period it illustrates, particularly when graphed, where the problem lies with wind power. That is, because it is dependent on wind availability and strength, the power produced is variable and unpredictable, requiring that some other electric power source be available at short notice to supplement what a wind farm produces.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
Sorry, but wind and solar not sustainable
November 16, 2006
by Colin Keay, Conjoint Associate Professor of Physics, University of Newcastle
Editor's Note This is an opinion piece located in IWA's resource library as it was submitted in pdf. form.
Also filed under [
Technology|
Zoning/Planning]
This indepth 142-page report looks at many dimensions of wind power including its contribution to sustainable energy; New Zealand developments to date; international trends; impacts on landscapes and communities; legal and policy frameworks; and case studies from Auckland, Wellington, and Manawatu.
Harvey Jones reports from Manawatu: Wind farms and their impact on the local community
May 22, 2006
by Harvey Jones, Ashhurst, Manawatu
Harvey Jones addresss aesthetics, shadow flicker, noise, soil erosion, ecology/bird strike, physical breakages and energy supply.
Compliments of Andrew Chapman, the attached pdf files contain extensive documentation particularly with respect to the impact of wind turbines on wildlife as part of an ongoing effort to prevent the construction of the Bald Hills Wind Farm, South Gippsland, Victoria.
While it has been approved by the Victorian State Government the presence in the Bald Hills area of migratory species of national and international significance that are protected by treaties with Japan and China in the Bald Hills has placed the final decision in the hands of the Federal Government. This decision is pending.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats|
Impact on People|
Noise|
Impact on Economy|
Property Values|
Tourism]
Macarthur Wind Farm P/L - Statement of Submission to Planning Panel Hearing by James Lyon
February 28, 2006
by James Lyon, Fairfield, Victoria
The Guidelines require that “In order to facilitate a viable wind energy industry, planning applications need to include sufficient information and explanation to allow responsible authorities to come to sound and timely decisions”.
Unfortunately, the application for a planning permit by Macarthur Wind Farm P/L fails to include sufficient information. The panel should therefore recommend that the a permit not be granted, and should ask the proponent to resubmit its application with
(i) A full estimate of all economic costs of the proposal, both internal and external.
(ii) A soundly based forecast of greenhouse gas abatement outcomes, based on the best available data and an independent, peer reviewed computer modelling of the NEM
(iii) A full, project specific, assessment of the energy and greenhouse gas costs of the proposal itself, including all directly and indirectly associated activities.