Documents
Category:
Tax Breaks & Subsidies and Kansas
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on Economy
> Tax Breaks & Subsidies
(46)
All > Location > USA > Kansas (11)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > Kansas (11)
Any of these categories
Stretching or Ignoring Facts and Making Unwarranted Assumptions when Attempting to Justify Wind Energy
October 31, 2006
by Glenn R. Schleede, Round Hill (VA)
This paper:
• Lists key reasons why political leaders and regulators are facing problems when attempting to deal with wind energy.
• Provides more information on the effort in Kansas to evaluate wind energy.
• Identifies facts about wind energy that are often not taken into account by political leaders and regulators.
• Comments on the efforts in Kansas to promote greater use of wind energy.
• Outlines lessons for all government officials that can be learned from the efforts in Kansas.
• Lists key reasons why political leaders and regulators are facing problems when attempting to deal with wind energy.
• Provides more information on the effort in Kansas to evaluate wind energy.
• Identifies facts about wind energy that are often not taken into account by political leaders and regulators.
• Comments on the efforts in Kansas to promote greater use of wind energy.
• Outlines lessons for all government officials that can be learned from the efforts in Kansas.
Tom Hewson Analyses Carbon Dioxide Savings of Gray County Wind Farm (KS)
2005
by Tom Hewson, Energy Ventures Analysis Inc
Given its location, Gray County would have displaced mostly NGCC and some oil fired generation. Using the average 2003 NGCC heatrate for the sub-powerpool (7,478 Btu/kWh) and the average CO2 content of natural gas (116 #CO2/MMBtu), the project may have displaced only 158,000 tons of CO2 in 2003 (0.00207% of 2003 US estimated emissions according to the USDOE report entitled Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 2003 (issued December 13, 2004). (Note in 2002, the output was less and it would have displaced only 140,000 tons).