Documents
Category:
Impact on Wildlife and Impact on Birds
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> Impact on Wildlife
(130)
All > Topics > Impact on Wildlife > Impact on Birds (76)
Any of these categories
All > Topics > Impact on Wildlife > Impact on Birds (76)
Any of these categories
Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Wildlife - Key Issues of Concern
January 6, 2006
by Bat Conservation International
We believe that wildlife kills can be prevented or minimized, and we advocate broad collaboration to achieve this end. However, until reliable solutions are developed, high risk areas should be avoided. These include locations along major migratory corridors or within the normal flight range of large roosting and feeding aggregations of birds or bats.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats]
A Radar and Visual Study of Nocturnal Bird and Bat Migration at the Proposed Highland New Wind Development Project, Virginia, Fall 2005
January 6, 2006
by ABR, Inc., Environmental Research & Services
This study focused on nocturnal migration
patterns and flight behaviors during the peak
periods of passerine and bat migration during fall
2005 at the proposed Highland New Wind
Development in Highland Count. Virginia. The key
results of our study were: (I) the mean overall fall
passage rate was 385 targetsikmh; (2)mean
nightly passage rates ranged from 9 to 2,762
targetshh, (3) the percentage of targets passing
below 125 m agl was 11.5%; (4) the estimated
turbine passage rate of nocturnal migrants passing
within the airspace occupied by each proposed
turbine was 3.4-24.7 migrantslturbineid during the
fall study period; (5) fall migrants flying at or
below maximal turbine height consisted of 88%
birds and 12% bats; and (6) passage rates, flight
altitudes, and visual observation rates of birds and
bats did not differ between the two survey sites
within the project area.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats|
Virginia]
Chilling Statistics - Birds / Windfarms - A Compilation Of Bird Mortality Reports.
2006
by iberica2000.org
This compilation of scientific reports provides compelling evidence of significant bird mortality at windfarms. Its cumulative effect with other causes of bird deaths may bring many species to extinction - especially as captivity-bred specimens will be lacking turbine-free habitats where they can be released safely.
Industrial Wind Action is pleased to include Donald S. Heintzelman as an ally in our efforts to educate the populace on the potential detrimental impacts of industrial wind energy facilities on migrating hawks, eagles, and falcons. Mr. Heintzelman, an ornithological and wildlife consultant with more than 50 years field experience, is a pioneer in the field of hawk migration science--particularly along the Appalachian ridgelines. He is the author of 21 published books including the four hawk migration books featured here. His books are important references for anyone interested in identifying where migrating hawks occur and understanding the flightpaths and behaviors of these amazing flying creatures. Three of his four books listed below are available on the used book market; the last recently was published by Falcon Guide/Globe Pequot Press as the 2nd edition of Guide to Hawk Watching in North America. Mr. Heintzelman lives in the rural countryside of southeastern Pennsylvania.
Also filed under [
USA]
Position Statement on Wind Farms and Birds
December 9, 2005
by BirdLife Birds and Habitats Directive Task Force
This BirdLife Position Statement focuses on the EU and its relevant legislative instruments, but it could be applied in all countries that are signatories to the Bern Convention too, as the underlying principles are just as relevant. Therefore, BirdLife Partners in the respective countries will be invited to adopt this position.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to the Town of Prattsburgh (NY)
November 28, 2005
by David A. Stilwell, Field Supervisor
The Steuben County Industrial Development Agency (IDA), as lead agency in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) process, is considering potential impacts from construction of 53 wind energy turbines which would generate approximately 79 megawatts of power. Turbine structures are anticipated to be approximately 389 feet tall from the ground to the highest blade tip. Structures such as a substation, 4.8 miles of buried cable, an unspecified amount of overhead transmission lines, and 3.4 miles of access roads must also be built in the 33,000 acre project area. This project is situated at the southern end of the Finger Lakes, near the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Hi Tor Wildlife Management Area, the Hi Tor Bird Conservation Area, and generally along a north-south oriented ridge.
Also filed under [
Impact on Bats|
New York]
Department of Sustainability and Environment on the Potential Impact of the Macarthur windplant on Brolga
October 21, 2005
by Dept. of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria
The Department of Sustainability and Environment has considered and evaluated the above [Macarthur] application pursuant to, section 52 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. DSE offers the following response to the above proposal.
Also filed under [
Australia / New Zealand]
United State Fish and Wildlife Service Reviews Chautauqua Windpower's Avian Risk Assessment
October 12, 2005
by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) sent two letters October 12, 2005 to
David Perry, Executive Vice President of Chautauqua Windpower LLC, severely critical of the
draft Avian Risk Assessment (ARA) completed by Chautauqua Windpower and its consultants
for the proposed wind power development in the Towns of Ripley and Westfield, Chautauqua
County, New York. The shorter of the two letters focuses on the ARA’s attention to migrating
and resident American Bald Eagles; the longer of the two letters consists of a broader evaluation
of the ARA and its attention to all resident and migrating birds.
The pdf file below is a brief summary of the USFWS letters criticizing the risk assessment. The full text of the two USFWS letters is available via the link below.
Also filed under [
New York]
Objection to Proposed Wind Energy Facility at Macarthur
October 6, 2005
by Andrew Chapman, Inverloch
This submission deals only with the potential impact on the natural environment and in particular birds and bats.
NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation letter to the City of Lackawanna re. Environmental Contamination and Birds/Bats
September 2, 2005
by Kevin Kispert, Environmental Analyst II, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
September 2, 2005
City of Lackawanna Planning and Development Board
Room 311, City Hall
714 Ridge Road
Lackawanna, NY 14218
Attn: Joseph G. Geyer
Re: Steel Winds Wind Farm
Route 5, Former Bethlehem Steels works
Lackawanna, NY
Dear Mr. Geyer;
The New York Sate Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) staff have
performed an initial review of the information and material provided with the City of
Lackawanna’s SEQR Notice of Coordinated Review and Declaration of Intent to Act as Lead
agency. These materials include the Application for Site Plan Approval and Certain Area
variances to Authorize Construction and Operation of a Wind Energy Facility on a Portion of the
Former Bethlehem Steel Works Site in Lackawanna, New York (the Application), and the
Analysis of Environmental Impacts pursuant to SEQR (The EA). Please be advised the DEC
does not object to the City of Lackawanna assuming the role of lead agency, but the DEC does
reserve the right to comment on this action if a positive determination is made. As indicated in
the following text of this letter, DEC staff have concerns for the potential impacts of certain
aspects of this project. Our comments and concerns are listed below under the appropriate topic.