Documents
Category:
UK
..neither renewable energy nor greater energy efficiency can provide the complete solution to the shortfall we face. This will depend on securing energy supplies from abroad, in new nuclear power stations to replace those becoming obsolete and replacing older coal-fired stations with cleaner, more efficient technology.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
CAP 764 - CAA Policy and Guidelines on Wind Turbines
June, 2006
by Civil Aviation Authority - Directorate of Airspace Policy
Neither aviation nor the wind energy industry is at a steady state and both can be
expected to evolve in ways which may impact the other. Therefore, it is expected that
this CAP will be a living document, which will be updated to reflect the outcome of
any further research into the interaction between wind turbine developments and
aviation. It will also be revised at intervals to take account of changes in regulations,
feedback from industry, and recognised best practice.
Editor's Note: Recently updated, Elizabeth Mann's extensive research on the deceptive measures employed by proponents of industrial wind energy in the UK at both the national and local level should prove quite useful to opponents of wind energy in the UK.
A7 Energy's appeal against the Easington District Council for refusing to grant planning permission with respect to a wind plant consisting of 2 x 2.3MW turbines was dismissed by D. L. Burrows, an inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. The principal reason for dismissal was adverse impact the turbines would have on the activities of Shotten airfield.
Keeping the lights on: nuclear, renewables, and climate change
April 18, 2006
by Environmental Audit Committee
The full Executive Summary of the Report is printed below. The complete Report is attached as a pdf file.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
The following submission first discusses BWEA’s position on the headline issues before
turning to detailed responses to the five questions and four issues on which Government
sought views. We are also including four appendices, which address the development of
onshore wind, offshore wind and marine renewables, as well as the combined contribution
that these technologies plus wind microgeneration can make to our power supplies in 2020.
We believe that the evidence we are presenting makes a strong case for setting a firm
target of 20% of our electricity from renewable generators in 2020. If this is done it will
show that the UK Government is serious in setting this country on a course towards its longterm
carbon reduction goals as well as increasing the security of our energy supplies.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
Comments from the CLOWD website:
The Government has been misled in the past by the wind energy industry into believing that wind turbines offer a viable method of producing energy. The variability and intermittency of wind energy has been underestimated because the wind statistics used have been unscientifically and misleadingly presented. The paper ‘UK Wind Energy Resources (Variability, Intermittency, Dispersal)’ shows the more realistic situation for mainland UK and in particular the situation that is likely to occur should wind farms be built inland far from the coast and at relatively low elevation.
The Government has been misled in the past by the wind energy industry into believing that wind turbines offer a viable method of producing energy. The variability and intermittency of wind energy has been underestimated because the wind statistics used have been unscientifically and misleadingly presented. The paper ‘UK Wind Energy Resources (Variability, Intermittency, Dispersal)’ shows the more realistic situation for mainland UK and in particular the situation that is likely to occur should wind farms be built inland far from the coast and at relatively low elevation.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
The Secretary of State accepts the Inspector’s [David M H Rose] findings on the section 36 application. He agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions that the Whinash site is an important and integral part of a far reaching landscape which is highly sensitive to change and that the adverse environmental impacts of the Development would conflict with the aims of Planning Policy Statement 22 which is, in part, to minimise the impacts of wind generation and to achieve environmental safeguards. He also agrees with the Inspector’s conclusion that the environmental harm to this particular landscape outweighs the benefits of securing renewable energy at the Whinash site. The Secretary of State therefore accepts, taking account of the further comments below, the Inspector’s recommendation that consent be refused.
Editor's Note: The pdf file contains the complete report.
Avian Fatalities Caused by Wind Turbines, Cumulative Impacts, and Trade-offs for Birds and Bats
February, 2006
by Albert M. Manville, II, Ph.D., Senior Wildlife Biologist, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
The Service favors:
--conservation of wildlife in the public trust;
--development of renewable energy that is bird and bat friendly; and
--use of informed decisions based on adequate environmental assessment and sound science.
--conservation of wildlife in the public trust;
--development of renewable energy that is bird and bat friendly; and
--use of informed decisions based on adequate environmental assessment and sound science.
This report has focused on the cost of generating electricity. While this is an important consideration in the choice of power generation technology it should be recognised that wider issues also contribute to the technology employed. This may, for example, include technology complementation, security of fuel supplies, and social and environmental factors.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
| << Germany | Ireland >> |