Documents
Category:
General or Impact on Landscape
Browse in :
All
> Topics
> General (350)
All > Topics > Impact on Landscape (101)
All of these categories
All > Topics > Impact on Landscape (101)
All of these categories
Jon Boone's response, published in The Caledonian Record in August 2005, to those who challenged the authenticity of his DVD "Life Under a Windplant".
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on Views|
Impact on People|
Noise|
Lighting|
Property Values|
Pennsylvania]
Jon Boone's Response to Maryland's Dept. of Natural Resources' Data Request
September 2, 2005
by Jon Boone
Jon Boone's responses to Maryland's Dept. of Natural Resources' request for data regarding his opposition to the proposed Roth Rock wind plant.
Jon Boone's responses to Synergics's requests for data are available in the NWW library as are his direct testimony before the Maryland Public Service Commission and the 'brief' he submitted to the PSC.
As an intervenor in the Maryland Public Service Commission case (No. 9008) regarding Synergics Wind Energy, LLC's request for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to build a 42.5 MW wind facility in Garrett County, Maryland, Jon Boone was presented with three sets of interrogatories from the applicant--Synergics Data Requests 1, 2, 3-- as well as an interrogatory from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources--DNR Data Request 1. Since the responses to these various interrogatories reveal much information about sources and a basic approach to questions about the wind industry, NWW is pleased to be able to make them available to the public.
Wind Power Ethics Group v. Town of Cape Vincent ZBA et.al. Index No. 07-0789; RJI No. 22-07-0250
Juniata Valley Audubon position on industrial wind development in Blair County, PA
June, 2007
by Stan Kotala, M.D., President, Juniata Valley Audubon
The below is the Juniata Valley Audubon's statement of position on industrial wind energy development in Blair County, PA.
Jurisdictional Ruling by Vermont's Environmental Board
October 6, 2005
by District Environmental Commission, Springfield, Vermont
The Windham Regional Commission asked the District Environmental Commission if the proposed commercial wind energy development on Glebe Mountain requires an an Act 250 amendment as well as a permit under Section 248 (30 V.S.A Section 248).
Act 250 is designed to protect Vermont's ridgelines above 2500'. Section 248 authorizes the Public Service Board to issue 'Certificates of Public Good' for electricity generating projects.
The District Environmental Commission concluded that construction of the wind measurement towers and the proposed wind energy project represent material and substantial changes to existing Act 250 permits and thus require an amendment.