Documents
Causes of bat fatalities at wind turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions
November, 2009
by Paul M. Cryan and Robert M. R. Barclay
Summary:
Thousands of industrial-scale wind turbines are being built across the world each year to meet the growing demand for sustainable energy. Bats of certain species are dying at wind turbines in unprecedented numbers. Species of bats consistently affected by turbines tend to be those that rely on trees as roosts and most migrate long distances. Although considerable progress has been made in recent years toward better understanding the problem, the causes of bat fatalities at turbines remain unclear. In this synthesis, we review hypothesized causes of bat fatalities at turbines. Hypotheses of cause fall into 2 general categories—proximate and ultimate. Proximate causes explain the direct means by which bats die at turbines and include collision with towers and rotating blades, and barotrauma. Ultimate causes explain why bats come close to turbines and include 3 general types: random collisions, coincidental collisions, and collisions that result from attraction of bats to turbines. The random collision hypothesis posits that interactions between bats and turbines are random events and that fatalities are representative of the bats present at a site. Coincidental hypotheses posit that certain aspects of bat distribution or behavior put them at risk of collision and include aggregation during migration and seasonal increases in flight activity associated with feeding or mating. A surprising number of attraction hypotheses suggest that bats might be attracted to turbines out of curiosity, misperception, or as potential feeding, roosting, flocking, and mating opportunities. Identifying, prioritizing, and testing hypothesized causes of bat collisions with wind turbines are vital steps toward developing practical solutions to the problem.
This article appears in the December, 2009 issue of Journal of Mammalogy Published by the American Society of Mammalogists. The full article can be downloaded by clicking on the link at the bottom of this page.
The Authors:
Paul M. Cryan: United States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA (cryanp@usgs.gov )
Robert M. R. Barclay: University of Calgary, Department of Biological Sciences, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Special Feature Editor was Barbara H. Blake.
| < prev | next > |
Note: this article may be subject to the Fair Use Notice.