    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c91+116?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Mitigation site on Long Mountain with timber cuts</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20858</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:21:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ One of the proposed mitigation sites offered by Noble Environmental in hopes of gaining support for its 33-turbine wind proposal in Coos County, New Hampshire. The mitigation land is approximately 200 acres and shows recent timber cuts.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>One of the proposed mitigation sites offered by Noble Environmental in hopes of gaining support for its 33-turbine wind proposal in Coos County, New Hampshire. The mitigation land is approximately 200 acres and shows recent timber cuts. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20858</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Mount Kelsey wind project mitigation site</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20856</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ One of the proposed mitigation sites offered by Noble Environmental in hopes of gaining support for its 33 turbine wind proposal in Coos County, New Hampshire. The mitigation land will surround an expansive land area that includes the turbine pads and road along the ridge top. 

It is uncertain how much of the remaining unfragmented forested habitat will be diminished due to edge effects caused by the road and turbine pads. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>One of the proposed mitigation sites offered by Noble Environmental in hopes of gaining support for its 33 turbine wind proposal in Coos County, New Hampshire. The mitigation land will surround an expansive land area that includes the turbine pads and road along the ridge top. 

It is uncertain how much of the remaining unfragmented forested habitat will be diminished due to edge effects caused by the road and turbine pads.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20856</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lempster, NH wind site topography</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12756</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12756</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine variance decision on hold</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23488</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ After holding a public hearing for the first proposed wind turbine in Gilford, and without an engineer to answer specific technical questions, the Zoning Board of Adjustment decided to resume the hearing at a later date. ...The ZBA asked that the Lavallieres hire an independent engineer to test the property and the different sites, one of which is in need of a variance and another on the shoreline, though the shoreline is not a desired location for the applicants, who fear the turbine could cause an &quot;eyesore.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>After holding a public hearing for the first proposed wind turbine in Gilford, and without an engineer to answer specific technical questions, the Zoning Board of Adjustment decided to resume the hearing at a later date. ...The ZBA asked that the Lavallieres hire an independent engineer to test the property and the different sites, one of which is in need of a variance and another on the shoreline, though the shoreline is not a desired location for the applicants, who fear the turbine could cause an &quot;eyesore.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23488</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bus trip to NH wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21729</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Officials from Vermont Community Wind have organized a bus trip to a wind farm in New Hampshire to try and build support for a large scale wind farm they're proposing in and around the Rutland County town of Ira. 

Company officials say about 35 residents from the area will travel to Lempster, New Hampshire, on Saturday where a 24-megawatt wind farm has recently been built. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Officials from Vermont Community Wind have organized a bus trip to a wind farm in New Hampshire to try and build support for a large scale wind farm they're proposing in and around the Rutland County town of Ira. 

Company officials say about 35 residents from the area will travel to Lempster, New Hampshire, on Saturday where a 24-megawatt wind farm has recently been built. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21729</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm gets thumbs-up on final 3 criteria</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21366</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A proposed $275 million wind park in Coos Country has meet the statutory criteria to go forward. 

The Site Evaluation Committee yesterday agreed the project proposed by Granite Reliable Power LLC did not adversely affect the natural environment, water and air quality or public health and safety, but will decide what conditions will be placed on the project at a later date. ...The evaluation committee also voted yesterday to give itself another month to make a final determination on the project. The deadline is now June 30. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A proposed $275 million wind park in Coos Country has meet the statutory criteria to go forward. 

The Site Evaluation Committee yesterday agreed the project proposed by Granite Reliable Power LLC did not adversely affect the natural environment, water and air quality or public health and safety, but will decide what conditions will be placed on the project at a later date. ...The evaluation committee also voted yesterday to give itself another month to make a final determination on the project. The deadline is now June 30. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21366</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm deliberations to wrap up on April 29 </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20902</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dr. Kent also said he believed it would be important for the state Fish and Game Department and scientists from the Appalachian Mountain Club to verify - ground-truth - the condition of the 1,700 acres that would be set aside as a mitigation package to compensate for habitat loss on Mt. Kelsey and Dixville Peak. 

&quot;We need to know the details, what's really on the ground, to understand if it's &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; - that is, the same spruce-fir habitat that will be lost on those ridgelines,&quot; Dr. Kent said. &quot;No evidence has been presented.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Dr. Kent also said he believed it would be important for the state Fish and Game Department and scientists from the Appalachian Mountain Club to verify - ground-truth - the condition of the 1,700 acres that would be set aside as a mitigation package to compensate for habitat loss on Mt. Kelsey and Dixville Peak. 

&quot;We need to know the details, what's really on the ground, to understand if it's &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; - that is, the same spruce-fir habitat that will be lost on those ridgelines,&quot; Dr. Kent said. &quot;No evidence has been presented.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20902</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>State to hear plans for new wind farm in Coos County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20301</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ On Monday New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee is going to begin evaluating a proposed renewable energy project for Coos county. 
Granite Reliable Power wants to put up 33 wind turbines on nine miles of ridgeline across Millsfield, Dixville and Dummer. 

The project would go a long way to increasing the state's renewable energy portfolio.

But as NHPR Correspondent Chris Jensen reports, it has a great deal of opposition.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>On Monday New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee is going to begin evaluating a proposed renewable energy project for Coos county. 
Granite Reliable Power wants to put up 33 wind turbines on nine miles of ridgeline across Millsfield, Dixville and Dummer. 

The project would go a long way to increasing the state's renewable energy portfolio.

But as NHPR Correspondent Chris Jensen reports, it has a great deal of opposition.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20301</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Army Corps of Engineers seeks input on wind energy project</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20011</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Granite Reliable Power, LLC, a subsidiary of Noble Environmental Power, is seeking a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for work in waters of the United States in conjunction with the development of a 100-megawatt wind energy facility in Coös County. 

The applicant proposes to place fill material in approximately 14 acres of waters and wetlands in conjunction with the development of the proposed facility, which has numerous project elements. ...Public comments regarding this permit request (File # NAE-2008-410) should be submitted no later than February 27 to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Granite Reliable Power, LLC, a subsidiary of Noble Environmental Power, is seeking a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for work in waters of the United States in conjunction with the development of a 100-megawatt wind energy facility in Coös County. 

The applicant proposes to place fill material in approximately 14 acres of waters and wetlands in conjunction with the development of the proposed facility, which has numerous project elements. ...Public comments regarding this permit request (File # NAE-2008-410) should be submitted no later than February 27 to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20011</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Northern wind farm raises habitat worry</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19880</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Biologists for Fish and Game said the project of Granite Reliable Power LLC to build 33 turbines in the Dixville Peak and Mount Kelsey area would permanently bisect habitat of at least four wildlife species and will have &quot;severe and unmitigated adverse effects on the natural community,&quot; which is host to about 60 others.

AMC has filed as an intervenor on the project, expressing concern about the siting of half of the 33 turbines for the same reasons.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Biologists for Fish and Game said the project of Granite Reliable Power LLC to build 33 turbines in the Dixville Peak and Mount Kelsey area would permanently bisect habitat of at least four wildlife species and will have &quot;severe and unmitigated adverse effects on the natural community,&quot; which is host to about 60 others.

AMC has filed as an intervenor on the project, expressing concern about the siting of half of the 33 turbines for the same reasons.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19880</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbines, protected species intersect; Plans for wind farm face a legal dilemma </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19821</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Granite Reliable Power's plan to erect 33 wind turbines on peaks in Coos County might be good for Gov. John Lynch and his goal of making 25 percent of the state's energy renewable by 2025. It would not be so good, according to Fish and Game officials, for the American marten or the three-toed woodpecker, threatened species that depend on the high-altitude forests that the project would disrupt.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Granite Reliable Power's plan to erect 33 wind turbines on peaks in Coos County might be good for Gov. John Lynch and his goal of making 25 percent of the state's energy renewable by 2025. It would not be so good, according to Fish and Game officials, for the American marten or the three-toed woodpecker, threatened species that depend on the high-altitude forests that the project would disrupt. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19821</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lempster, N.H., Will Review Plans for a Wind Farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/854</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dec. 8--LEMPSTER -- Town officials plan to seek state review of a proposed wind farm along Lempster Mountain's ridgeline.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Dec. 8--LEMPSTER -- Town officials plan to seek state review of a proposed wind farm along Lempster Mountain's ridgeline.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/854</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>US Fish and Wildlife Service comments on Noble Environmental's proposed wind facility in Coos County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20443</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:10:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers details the deficiencies in Noble Environmental Power's application to build a 99-megawatt wind energy facility in Coos County, New Hampshire. The US Fish and Wildlife Service makes a powerful case for why a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be undertaken in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers details the deficiencies in Noble Environmental Power's application to build a 99-megawatt wind energy facility in Coos County, New Hampshire. The US Fish and Wildlife Service makes a powerful case for why a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be undertaken in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20443</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>US EPA comments on Noble Environmental's proposed wind energy facility in Coos County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20444</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers details the deficiencies in Noble Environmental Power's application to build a 99-megawatt wind energy facility in Coos County, New Hampshire. The US Environmental Protection Agency makes a powerful case for why a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be undertaken in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This letter to the US Army Corps of Engineers details the deficiencies in Noble Environmental Power's application to build a 99-megawatt wind energy facility in Coos County, New Hampshire. The US Environmental Protection Agency makes a powerful case for why a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be undertaken in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20444</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Nature Conservancy of NH comments regarding Coos County wind proposal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20358</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Nature Conservancy of New Hampshire submitted the below comments to the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee in response to a proposal pending before the committee. The proposal, known as the Granite Reliable Power (GRP, LLC) Wind Park, seeks to erect thirty-three 3.0MW turbines along the Kelsey, Owlshead, and Dixville peaks located in Coos County, NH. GRP, LLC is owned by Noble Environmental Power. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Nature Conservancy of New Hampshire submitted the below comments to the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee in response to a proposal pending before the committee. The proposal, known as the Granite Reliable Power (GRP, LLC) Wind Park, seeks to erect thirty-three 3.0MW turbines along the Kelsey, Owlshead, and Dixville peaks located in Coos County, NH. GRP, LLC is owned by Noble Environmental Power.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20358</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Audubon Society of NH comments regarding Coos County wind proposal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20359</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Audubon Society of New Hampshire submitted comments to the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee in response to a proposal pending before the committee. The proposal, known as the Granite Reliable Power (GRP, LLC) Wind Park, seeks to erect thirty-three 3.0MW turbines along the Kelsey, Owlshead, and Dixville peaks located in Coos County, NH. GRP, LLC is owned by Noble Environmental Power.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Audubon Society of New Hampshire submitted comments to the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee in response to a proposal pending before the committee. The proposal, known as the Granite Reliable Power (GRP, LLC) Wind Park, seeks to erect thirty-three 3.0MW turbines along the Kelsey, Owlshead, and Dixville peaks located in Coos County, NH. GRP, LLC is owned by Noble Environmental Power. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20359</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lempster Mountain Wind Power Project: Direct Pre-filed Testimony of Lisa Linowes</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7893</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <br>
Why did you petition to become an intervenor in this matter before the NH SEC? <br>
<br>
With New Hampshire’s recent reinstatement of PILOT agreements and legislative efforts to a Renewable Portfolio Standard, the regulatory groundwork is being laid for more wind facilities to enter the state. Yet, New Hampshire, like many states, has no consistent regulatory process in place for reviewing these projects to ensure our environmental, societal, and economic interests are protected. The work the NH SEC has agreed to undertake in reviewing this application is precedent setting. How the committee approaches its review and the weight it places on arguments presented by all sides will impact other developments in the State as pertains to renewable energy projects. <br>
<br>
There are a multitude of conflicting issues at play when considering any wind project. My commitment to this process is to help provide, to the best of my ability, valuable and timely information that will assist the Committee in making an informed decision on this application. 


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
Why did you petition to become an intervenor in this matter before the NH SEC? 

With New Hampshire’s recent reinstatement of PILOT agreements and legislative efforts to a Renewable Portfolio Standard, the regulatory groundwork is being laid for more wind facilities to enter the state. Yet, New Hampshire, like many states, has no consistent regulatory process in place for reviewing these projects to ensure our environmental, societal, and economic interests are protected. The work the NH SEC has agreed to undertake in reviewing this application is precedent setting. How the committee approaches its review and the weight it places on arguments presented by all sides will impact other developments in the State as pertains to renewable energy projects. 

There are a multitude of conflicting issues at play when considering any wind project. My commitment to this process is to help provide, to the best of my ability, valuable and timely information that will assist the Committee in making an informed decision on this application. 


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7893</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbines not so benign</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/24072</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In his letter to the editor on Nov. 6, Jeff Wennberg painted a ridiculously benign picture of the impact on the mountains of Ira if construction of about 40 wind turbines takes place there. For instance, Jeff states, &quot;Anyone who has seen a completed wind farm on forested land knows that these projects follow the contours of the terrain.&quot; He cites the Lempster wind turbine site as an example. ...The blasting and construction of wide service roads and tower base areas there have changed the contours of the land so drastically that, when I now stand in the area of this project, I have a hard time imagining what the terrain looked like before. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In his letter to the editor on Nov. 6, Jeff Wennberg painted a ridiculously benign picture of the impact on the mountains of Ira if construction of about 40 wind turbines takes place there. For instance, Jeff states, &quot;Anyone who has seen a completed wind farm on forested land knows that these projects follow the contours of the terrain.&quot; He cites the Lempster wind turbine site as an example. ...The blasting and construction of wide service roads and tower base areas there have changed the contours of the land so drastically that, when I now stand in the area of this project, I have a hard time imagining what the terrain looked like before.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/24072</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Requiem for the high country</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20925</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ It now appears likely that the state's Site Evaluation Committee will grant a permit for the construction of 33 410-foot tall, blinking-light-topped wind turbines across seven or so miles of horizon, and the huge road system needed to construct and maintain them. ...we have become a state willing to sell its scenery and its very skyline for profits and power going elsewhere.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>It now appears likely that the state's Site Evaluation Committee will grant a permit for the construction of 33 410-foot tall, blinking-light-topped wind turbines across seven or so miles of horizon, and the huge road system needed to construct and maintain them. ...we have become a state willing to sell its scenery and its very skyline for profits and power going elsewhere. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20925</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind power is unworkable</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20681</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The reason I strongly oppose the wind-power project is that it will despoil miles of wild and beautiful high-country scenery and skyline for power and profits that will go far to the south and leave us with little in the way of local jobs or economic gain. It is simply a bad trade-off. Conservationists and stewards of the land have been trying to buy the Phillips Brook tract and preserve it ...This massive wind project and the ridge-scarring road system to build and maintain it would nail such hopes in a coffin. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The reason I strongly oppose the wind-power project is that it will despoil miles of wild and beautiful high-country scenery and skyline for power and profits that will go far to the south and leave us with little in the way of local jobs or economic gain. It is simply a bad trade-off. Conservationists and stewards of the land have been trying to buy the Phillips Brook tract and preserve it ...This massive wind project and the ridge-scarring road system to build and maintain it would nail such hopes in a coffin.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20681</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
