	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c89+117?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c89+117?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>ND regulators seek rule change on wind power costs</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21456" title="ND regulators seek rule change on wind power costs"/> 
	<id>.21456</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-04T07:41:15Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-04T07:41:15Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Otter Tail Power Co. estimate the current rules could drive up their customers' monthly bills by 18 percent to 30 percent annually.

If the problem is not remedied, it could undermine public backing for wind power development in North Dakota, Public Service Commissioner Tony Clark said. The state has more than 700 megawatts of wind generation capacity, with more than 3,000 megawatts of projects planned.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21456">
		<![CDATA[ Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. and Otter Tail Power Co. estimate the current rules could drive up their customers' monthly bills by 18 percent to 30 percent annually.

If the problem is not remedied, it could undermine public backing for wind power development in North Dakota, Public Service Commissioner Tony Clark said. The state has more than 700 megawatts of wind generation capacity, with more than 3,000 megawatts of projects planned.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbines are ugly, noisy</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10913" title="Wind turbines are ugly, noisy"/> 
	<id>.10913</id> 
	<updated>2007-07-24T11:42:05Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-07-24T11:42:05Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">There is a person near here who has had most everything done to his house to try to keep the noise out. The power company, from what I understand, is paying for trying to keep the noise out in his home. Nothing has worked. He still has the constant noise in his home. Unfortunately, the tower is on the neighbor's land. He is just going to have to put up with it.

I had two couples come out looking at lots and both of them wanted front lots or lots at the top of the hill. When the women got here and looked around, they looked at the view to the north and to the south. No way, they said. We are not going to look at those towers the rest of our lives and both couples left. One of the couples bought 40 acres. The other couple would not buy around the wind charger area. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10913">
		<![CDATA[ There is a person near here who has had most everything done to his house to try to keep the noise out. The power company, from what I understand, is paying for trying to keep the noise out in his home. Nothing has worked. He still has the constant noise in his home. Unfortunately, the tower is on the neighbor's land. He is just going to have to put up with it.

I had two couples come out looking at lots and both of them wanted front lots or lots at the top of the hill. When the women got here and looked around, they looked at the view to the north and to the south. No way, they said. We are not going to look at those towers the rest of our lives and both couples left. One of the couples bought 40 acres. The other couple would not buy around the wind charger area.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
