	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c80+51?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c80+51?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <p>
       [
             
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c51+80+39/">
                Impact on Views</a>
            | 
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c51+80+45/">
                Impact on People</a>
       ]
   </p>
<div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19492">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/1761.jpg?height=113&amp;width=150" alt="Newburyport turbine view from residential property line"  width="150" height="113" />                        <span>
                            Newburyport turbine view from residential property line</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <p>
       [
             
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c51+80+116/">
                Impact on Landscape</a>
            | 
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c51+80+39/">
                Impact on Views</a>
       ]
   </p>
<div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19491">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/1756.jpg?height=113&amp;width=150" alt="Newburyport turbine construction"  width="150" height="113" />                        <span>
                            Newburyport turbine construction</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/2288">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/571.jpg?height=78&amp;width=150" alt="Fallen Turbine"  width="150" height="78" />                        <span>
                            Fallen Turbine</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <entry>
	<title>Five more MMA turbines face review </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23730" title="Five more MMA turbines face review "/> 
	<id>.23730</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-21T11:18:03Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-21T11:18:03Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">An automated review of 17 proposed wind turbines at the Massachusetts Military Reservation flagged five more as a presumed hazard to aviation, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration said yesterday.
But when all is said and done, the reversal on those five turbines, which just one week earlier were considered OK, may be a mere blip on the radar screen, FAA spokesman Jim Peters said.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23730">
		<![CDATA[ An automated review of 17 proposed wind turbines at the Massachusetts Military Reservation flagged five more as a presumed hazard to aviation, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration said yesterday.
But when all is said and done, the reversal on those five turbines, which just one week earlier were considered OK, may be a mere blip on the radar screen, FAA spokesman Jim Peters said.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA Reverses Decision On Turbines At Cape Base</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23657" title="FAA Reverses Decision On Turbines At Cape Base"/> 
	<id>.23657</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-16T21:33:58Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-16T21:33:58Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Federal Aviation Administration says five wind turbines can't be built at the Massachusetts Military Reservation on Cape Cod, six days after approving them.

The FAA now says the 400-foot high turbines pose a hazard to air navigation.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23657">
		<![CDATA[ The Federal Aviation Administration says five wind turbines can't be built at the Massachusetts Military Reservation on Cape Cod, six days after approving them.

The FAA now says the 400-foot high turbines pose a hazard to air navigation. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Losing altitude</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20548" title="Losing altitude"/> 
	<id>.20548</id> 
	<updated>2009-03-26T18:23:43Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-03-26T18:23:43Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The town's chances of becoming greener have been curtailed by its proximity to Logan International Airport, which is 0.2 to 2 miles from any given point in the community. The two locations identified for a turbine are 0.75 and 1.25 miles from the airport, according to the DPW.

After submitting a permit application early last year, town officials received a verbal report in November from the Federal Aviation Administration that indicated that a 250-foot structure in the vicinity of the DPW site would create, &amp;quot;a potential concern with sound landing and takeoff procedures and may be within or uncomfortably close to critical surface area zones,&amp;quot; Hickey stated in a letter to Winthrop's town manager last year.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20548">
		<![CDATA[ The town's chances of becoming greener have been curtailed by its proximity to Logan International Airport, which is 0.2 to 2 miles from any given point in the community. The two locations identified for a turbine are 0.75 and 1.25 miles from the airport, according to the DPW.

After submitting a permit application early last year, town officials received a verbal report in November from the Federal Aviation Administration that indicated that a 250-foot structure in the vicinity of the DPW site would create, &amp;quot;a potential concern with sound landing and takeoff procedures and may be within or uncomfortably close to critical surface area zones,&amp;quot; Hickey stated in a letter to Winthrop's town manager last year.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA's not ready to buy the farm </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20085" title="FAA's not ready to buy the farm "/> 
	<id>.20085</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-20T13:26:25Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-20T13:26:25Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Federal Aviation Administration is saying &amp;quot;not yet&amp;quot; on the proposed wind farm project for Nantucket Sound, issuing a &amp;quot;Notice of Presumed Hazard&amp;quot; Feb 13.

&amp;quot;Initial findings of this study indicate that the structure as described exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation facilities,&amp;quot; the FAA notice issued Feb. 13 reads. &amp;quot;Pending resolution of the issues described below, the structure is presumed to be a hazard to air navigation.&amp;quot;
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20085">
		<![CDATA[ The Federal Aviation Administration is saying &amp;quot;not yet&amp;quot; on the proposed wind farm project for Nantucket Sound, issuing a &amp;quot;Notice of Presumed Hazard&amp;quot; Feb 13.

&amp;quot;Initial findings of this study indicate that the structure as described exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation facilities,&amp;quot; the FAA notice issued Feb. 13 reads. &amp;quot;Pending resolution of the issues described below, the structure is presumed to be a hazard to air navigation.&amp;quot;
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA: Wind farm could interfere with air traffic</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20040" title="FAA: Wind farm could interfere with air traffic"/> 
	<id>.20040</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-17T14:38:42Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-17T14:38:42Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The FAA's &amp;quot;Notice of Presumed Hazard&amp;quot; warns that the 130 proposed turbines could have an &amp;quot;adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation facilities.&amp;quot;

The report warns the rotating blades of the turbines could cause unwanted &amp;quot;clutter&amp;quot; in radar systems.

To correct the problem, the FAA study recommends an upgrade of the radar system located at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, where regional air traffic control is conducted.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20040">
		<![CDATA[ The FAA's &amp;quot;Notice of Presumed Hazard&amp;quot; warns that the 130 proposed turbines could have an &amp;quot;adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon navigable airspace or air navigation facilities.&amp;quot;

The report warns the rotating blades of the turbines could cause unwanted &amp;quot;clutter&amp;quot; in radar systems.

To correct the problem, the FAA study recommends an upgrade of the radar system located at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, where regional air traffic control is conducted.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA finds radar interference and issues presumed hazard determination for Cape Wind</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19990" title="FAA finds radar interference and issues presumed hazard determination for Cape Wind"/> 
	<id>.19990</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-13T21:15:32Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-13T21:15:32Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">HYANNIS, Mass. -- After five years of strong objections by the Barnstable, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket airports and others on the safety of the 400,000 flights per year over Nantucket Sound, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today formally issued a Notice of Presumed Hazard for the Cape Wind project. Cape Wind is proposing a 44 story, 25 square mile wind project centered under the flight paths between Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket. The project would affect FAA radar sites in North Truro, Nantucket, and Otis Air Force Base that provide detection of aircraft for Air Traffic Control (ATC).</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19990">
		<![CDATA[ HYANNIS, Mass. -- After five years of strong objections by the Barnstable, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket airports and others on the safety of the 400,000 flights per year over Nantucket Sound, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today formally issued a Notice of Presumed Hazard for the Cape Wind project. Cape Wind is proposing a 44 story, 25 square mile wind project centered under the flight paths between Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket. The project would affect FAA radar sites in North Truro, Nantucket, and Otis Air Force Base that provide detection of aircraft for Air Traffic Control (ATC). ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA finds Cape Wind project would cause radar interference</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19979" title="FAA finds Cape Wind project would cause radar interference"/> 
	<id>.19979</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-13T03:35:30Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-13T03:35:30Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Federal aviation officials issued a report today finding that the Cape Wind project, which calls for erecting 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound, would pose a &amp;quot;presumed hazard&amp;quot; for airplanes because of interference with air traffic control radar systems.

&amp;quot;Initial findings of this study indicate that the structure as described exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect,&amp;quot; the Federal Aviation Administration said in the report.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19979">
		<![CDATA[ Federal aviation officials issued a report today finding that the Cape Wind project, which calls for erecting 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound, would pose a &amp;quot;presumed hazard&amp;quot; for airplanes because of interference with air traffic control radar systems.

&amp;quot;Initial findings of this study indicate that the structure as described exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect,&amp;quot; the Federal Aviation Administration said in the report.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA reverses denial of wind turbine at wastewater treatment facility</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19534" title="FAA reverses denial of wind turbine at wastewater treatment facility"/> 
	<id>.19534</id> 
	<updated>2009-01-16T23:18:27Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-01-16T23:18:27Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Last April the Federal Aviation Administration approved a proposal submitted by Notus Clean Energy LLC to erect a wind turbine in Falmouth Technology Park, determining that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation. 

On Christmas Eve, the FAA sent an e-mail to Daniel H. Webb, owner of Notus Clean Energy, notifying him that the approval had been revoked. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19534">
		<![CDATA[ Last April the Federal Aviation Administration approved a proposal submitted by Notus Clean Energy LLC to erect a wind turbine in Falmouth Technology Park, determining that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation. 

On Christmas Eve, the FAA sent an e-mail to Daniel H. Webb, owner of Notus Clean Energy, notifying him that the approval had been revoked. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Coast Guard: Cape Wind passes radar test</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19301" title="Coast Guard: Cape Wind passes radar test"/> 
	<id>.19301</id> 
	<updated>2008-12-25T13:05:00Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-12-25T13:05:00Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Coast Guard report, which is not yet released, reportedly considers the 130-turbine project in Nantucket Sound &amp;quot;doable&amp;quot; but some in the audience found the simulated radar scenarios more than a tad confusing as they tried to pick out the boats from the false echoes and turbine blades. ...There are short periods of time when the vessels are subsumed into the turbines,&amp;quot; Rugger concluded. &amp;quot;Inside the wind farm there are a lot of secondary reflections, and often times it's hard to pick out the vessels from that.&amp;quot;</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19301">
		<![CDATA[ The Coast Guard report, which is not yet released, reportedly considers the 130-turbine project in Nantucket Sound &amp;quot;doable&amp;quot; but some in the audience found the simulated radar scenarios more than a tad confusing as they tried to pick out the boats from the false echoes and turbine blades. ...There are short periods of time when the vessels are subsumed into the turbines,&amp;quot; Rugger concluded. &amp;quot;Inside the wind farm there are a lot of secondary reflections, and often times it's hard to pick out the vessels from that.&amp;quot; ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Another House chairman urges Cape Wind delay</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19270" title="Another House chairman urges Cape Wind delay"/> 
	<id>.19270</id> 
	<updated>2008-12-22T05:40:32Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-12-22T05:40:32Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">In a letter to U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthome dated Thursday, the congressman [Rahall D-WV] requests that the federal Minerals Management Service delay issuing its final environmental impact statement &amp;quot;until the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) has provided the public 60 days to review and comment on a third-party review of the radar study submitted by the Cape Wind project developers.&amp;quot;</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19270">
		<![CDATA[ In a letter to U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthome dated Thursday, the congressman [Rahall D-WV] requests that the federal Minerals Management Service delay issuing its final environmental impact statement &amp;quot;until the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) has provided the public 60 days to review and comment on a third-party review of the radar study submitted by the Cape Wind project developers.&amp;quot; ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>FAA wants proposed wind turbines trimmed</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19214" title="FAA wants proposed wind turbines trimmed"/> 
	<id>.19214</id> 
	<updated>2008-12-18T23:57:29Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-12-18T23:57:29Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently classified proposed wind turbine projects at West Tisbury School and the MV Arena (MVA) as presumed hazards to air navigation, given their location in the Martha's Vineyard Airport's flight paths. The FAA's decisions, which included recommendations for reducing the height of the two wind turbines, may literally take the wind out of the ice arena's project.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19214">
		<![CDATA[ The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently classified proposed wind turbine projects at West Tisbury School and the MV Arena (MVA) as presumed hazards to air navigation, given their location in the Martha's Vineyard Airport's flight paths. The FAA's decisions, which included recommendations for reducing the height of the two wind turbines, may literally take the wind out of the ice arena's project. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Turbine turbulence</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18593" title="Turbine turbulence"/> 
	<id>.18593</id> 
	<updated>2008-10-30T18:20:51Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-10-30T18:20:51Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">One of the largest businesses in town is working toward going green. Decas Cranberry Company in South Carver has proposed installing a test tower to measure the wind on the property in an effort to determine whether a wind turbine would be a viable future energy source for the company. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18593">
		<![CDATA[ One of the largest businesses in town is working toward going green. Decas Cranberry Company in South Carver has proposed installing a test tower to measure the wind on the property in an effort to determine whether a wind turbine would be a viable future energy source for the company.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Approval for wind tower urged in Plymouth: Neighbors opposed, but planning board favors proposal</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12567" title="Approval for wind tower urged in Plymouth: Neighbors opposed, but planning board favors proposal"/> 
	<id>.12567</id> 
	<updated>2007-11-07T23:27:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-11-07T23:27:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">...a 350-foot wind turbine may be too much of a good thing for Mountain Hill Road residents. ...The planning board made its decision Monday night, despite stiff opposition from neighborhood residents who packed town hall to protest the plan.

&#226;&#226;It's not that we're against wind energy, but the drop zone for one of the turbines would be within 85 to 200 feet of our neighbors,'' Mountain Hill Road resident William Gould said. &#226;&#226;These things are monstrous, and they are right on top of our neighborhood. The impact would be devastating.

&#226;&#226;The bylaw says five acres and wind is enough for a turbine. If this is approved, what neighborhood is next?''
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12567">
		<![CDATA[ ...a 350-foot wind turbine may be too much of a good thing for Mountain Hill Road residents. ...The planning board made its decision Monday night, despite stiff opposition from neighborhood residents who packed town hall to protest the plan.

&#226;&#226;It's not that we're against wind energy, but the drop zone for one of the turbines would be within 85 to 200 feet of our neighbors,'' Mountain Hill Road resident William Gould said. &#226;&#226;These things are monstrous, and they are right on top of our neighborhood. The impact would be devastating.

&#226;&#226;The bylaw says five acres and wind is enough for a turbine. If this is approved, what neighborhood is next?''
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Helicopter hovers over turbine site</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11587" title="Helicopter hovers over turbine site"/> 
	<id>.11587</id> 
	<updated>2007-08-30T22:20:20Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-08-30T22:20:20Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Massachusetts were shelved temporarily yesterday after officials were informed a wind turbine in Oregon collapsed and took a life four days earlier. Conveying the news, Michael Faherty, the attorney for Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, had to raise his voice over the noise of a helicopter hovering above Blackburn Industrial Park. 

The helicopter was brought in by Varian to show the council and community how high and visible the twin turbines would be. ... The towers would rise 328 feet from their bases with blade heights adding another 168 feet, for a total of 496 feet - roughly the height of a 30-story building. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11587">
		<![CDATA[ Massachusetts were shelved temporarily yesterday after officials were informed a wind turbine in Oregon collapsed and took a life four days earlier. Conveying the news, Michael Faherty, the attorney for Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, had to raise his voice over the noise of a helicopter hovering above Blackburn Industrial Park. 

The helicopter was brought in by Varian to show the council and community how high and visible the twin turbines would be. ... The towers would rise 328 feet from their bases with blade heights adding another 168 feet, for a total of 496 feet - roughly the height of a 30-story building. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Base windmill hinges on radar analysis</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10531" title="Base windmill hinges on radar analysis"/> 
	<id>.10531</id> 
	<updated>2007-07-04T11:49:36Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-07-04T11:49:36Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">OTIS AIR BASE - Plans to build a wind turbine at the base are on hold until officials figure out whether a turbine would interfere with the Air Force's PAVE PAWS radar station in Sagamore.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10531">
		<![CDATA[ OTIS AIR BASE - Plans to build a wind turbine at the base are on hold until officials figure out whether a turbine would interfere with the Air Force's PAVE PAWS radar station in Sagamore. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm would fall outside buffer zone for radar</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10226" title="Wind farm would fall outside buffer zone for radar"/> 
	<id>.10226</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-18T10:23:19Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-18T10:23:19Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A recently released Department of Defense report calls for a 25-kilometer &amp;quot;offset zone&amp;quot; between possible wind farms and the PAVE PAWS radar installation in Sagamore.
However, Cape Wind Associates' plan for a wind farm in Nantucket Sound would fall slightly more than two kilometers outside such a zone. According to the report, that means the proposed wind farm would not affect operations at the strategically vital defense radar site.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10226">
		<![CDATA[ A recently released Department of Defense report calls for a 25-kilometer &amp;quot;offset zone&amp;quot; between possible wind farms and the PAVE PAWS radar installation in Sagamore.
However, Cape Wind Associates' plan for a wind farm in Nantucket Sound would fall slightly more than two kilometers outside such a zone. According to the report, that means the proposed wind farm would not affect operations at the strategically vital defense radar site. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Dept. of Defense gives Cape Wind &quot;thumbs up&quot; - no impact on radar at Pave Paws</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10200" title="Dept. of Defense gives Cape Wind &amp;quot;thumbs up&amp;quot; - no impact on radar at Pave Paws"/> 
	<id>.10200</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-16T10:55:23Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-16T10:55:23Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">For several years US Congressman William Delahunt has been urging the United States Department of Defense to conduct a detailed study on whether the Cape Wind project 2 would interfere with the massive radar facility on the Upper Cape called Pave Paws 1.

Two week's ago Congressman Delahunt changed his mind about whether the Massachusetts Military Reservation where the Pave Paws is located was a good place for a wind farm. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10200">
		<![CDATA[ For several years US Congressman William Delahunt has been urging the United States Department of Defense to conduct a detailed study on whether the Cape Wind project 2 would interfere with the massive radar facility on the Upper Cape called Pave Paws 1.

Two week's ago Congressman Delahunt changed his mind about whether the Massachusetts Military Reservation where the Pave Paws is located was a good place for a wind farm.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
