	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c68?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c68?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Turbine work to begin</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22844" title="Turbine work to begin"/> 
	<id>.22844</id> 
	<updated>2009-08-24T20:41:41Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-08-24T20:41:41Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Construction on a 199-foot wind turbine on the Klug Hill Farm property is set to begin within the next two weeks, said property owner George &amp;quot;Butch&amp;quot; Klug. ...residents had opposed its construction on grounds it would be noisy and unsightly.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22844">
		<![CDATA[ Construction on a 199-foot wind turbine on the Klug Hill Farm property is set to begin within the next two weeks, said property owner George &amp;quot;Butch&amp;quot; Klug. ...residents had opposed its construction on grounds it would be noisy and unsightly. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Board OKs wind turbine in Torrington</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21748" title="Board OKs wind turbine in Torrington"/> 
	<id>.21748</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-25T02:26:22Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-25T02:26:22Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Optiwind company cleared what was likely its biggest hurdle toward the eventual construction of a 199-foot wind turbine Wednesday night as the city's Planning and Zoning Commission granted it a special zoning exception.

The proposal was unanimously approved with little discussion from the commission and no public comment. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21748">
		<![CDATA[ The Optiwind company cleared what was likely its biggest hurdle toward the eventual construction of a 199-foot wind turbine Wednesday night as the city's Planning and Zoning Commission granted it a special zoning exception.

The proposal was unanimously approved with little discussion from the commission and no public comment.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbine decision may happen Wednesday</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21653" title="Wind turbine decision may happen Wednesday"/> 
	<id>.21653</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-19T17:53:01Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-19T17:53:01Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Will Torrington soon be the home a 199-foot wind turbine? The city may know as early as next week.

The Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled to vote Wednesday on granting a permit to Optiwind for construction of a mid-sized wind turbine at 725 Klug Hill Road. The meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Sullivan Senior Center, 88 East Albert St.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21653">
		<![CDATA[ Will Torrington soon be the home a 199-foot wind turbine? The city may know as early as next week.

The Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled to vote Wednesday on granting a permit to Optiwind for construction of a mid-sized wind turbine at 725 Klug Hill Road. The meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Sullivan Senior Center, 88 East Albert St.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Public hearing on wind turbine tonight</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21509" title="Public hearing on wind turbine tonight"/> 
	<id>.21509</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-10T16:05:45Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-10T16:05:45Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The public hearing on making Torrington the home of a mid-sized wind turbine is scheduled for tonight, and the preliminary response has been moderately positive, an official said. ...Torrington-based Optiwind, a recent clean energy upstart, is scheduled to construct the turbine pending the results of tonight's public hearing, at 7:30 p.m. at the Sullivan Senior Center, 88 East Albert Street.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21509">
		<![CDATA[ The public hearing on making Torrington the home of a mid-sized wind turbine is scheduled for tonight, and the preliminary response has been moderately positive, an official said. ...Torrington-based Optiwind, a recent clean energy upstart, is scheduled to construct the turbine pending the results of tonight's public hearing, at 7:30 p.m. at the Sullivan Senior Center, 88 East Albert Street. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind Power: Can it make a profit?</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21447" title="Wind Power: Can it make a profit?"/> 
	<id>.21447</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-04T13:52:59Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-04T13:52:59Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Suddenly it's not so much how sunny or windy a site is, but rather how much money is available. States generally have guidelines to prevent people from installing a solar panel in a forest: Solar projects require a specific exposure to the south, and wind needs a certain expected average speed. But weather conditions vary wildly, and states often don't require businesses to perform tests to verify estimates. The danger: Government money will be poured into renewable projects that won't produce much energy.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21447">
		<![CDATA[ Suddenly it's not so much how sunny or windy a site is, but rather how much money is available. States generally have guidelines to prevent people from installing a solar panel in a forest: Solar projects require a specific exposure to the south, and wind needs a certain expected average speed. But weather conditions vary wildly, and states often don't require businesses to perform tests to verify estimates. The danger: Government money will be poured into renewable projects that won't produce much energy.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Zoning board sued over tower plan</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21368" title="Zoning board sued over tower plan"/> 
	<id>.21368</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-28T13:54:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-28T13:54:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A Colebrook man is suing the town&#226;€™s Planning and Zoning Commission over a temporary 180-foot meteorological tower built near his home.

Stephen King said the tower was approved by the commission without following its own zoning regulations, which do not allow for commercial developments in residential zones without a special permit. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21368">
		<![CDATA[ A Colebrook man is suing the town&#226;€™s Planning and Zoning Commission over a temporary 180-foot meteorological tower built near his home.

Stephen King said the tower was approved by the commission without following its own zoning regulations, which do not allow for commercial developments in residential zones without a special permit.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Loophole allows wind turbine work in Colebrook without local debate</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21348" title="Loophole allows wind turbine work in Colebrook without local debate"/> 
	<id>.21348</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-25T11:06:01Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-25T11:06:01Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Because of a loophole that allows zoning boards to approve test towers for wind turbines without notifying neighbors, residents near terrain favorable for wind energy could face the prospect of a major wind energy project being built in their community with limited ability to challenge it. ...That decision - affirmed at a contentious zoning board of appeals hearing in Colebrook in February - is now being challenged by King and other neighbors in a case scheduled to reach Superior Court in Litchfield in August.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21348">
		<![CDATA[ Because of a loophole that allows zoning boards to approve test towers for wind turbines without notifying neighbors, residents near terrain favorable for wind energy could face the prospect of a major wind energy project being built in their community with limited ability to challenge it. ...That decision - affirmed at a contentious zoning board of appeals hearing in Colebrook in February - is now being challenged by King and other neighbors in a case scheduled to reach Superior Court in Litchfield in August. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Optiwind will appeal decision, explore other locations</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21077" title="Optiwind will appeal decision, explore other locations"/> 
	<id>.21077</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-06T20:19:25Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-06T20:19:25Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A spokesman for Optiwind, a renewable energy company focused on wind power, said the company plans on appealing a decision by the Goshen Planning and Zoning Commission to reject a proposal to build a nearly 200-foot wind turbine.

Spokesman David Hurwitt said his company plans on filing the appeal with the Litchfield County Superior Court within the two-week deadline. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21077">
		<![CDATA[ A spokesman for Optiwind, a renewable energy company focused on wind power, said the company plans on appealing a decision by the Goshen Planning and Zoning Commission to reject a proposal to build a nearly 200-foot wind turbine.

Spokesman David Hurwitt said his company plans on filing the appeal with the Litchfield County Superior Court within the two-week deadline. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbine denied in Goshen</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21054" title="Wind turbine denied in Goshen"/> 
	<id>.21054</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-05T13:54:03Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-05T13:54:03Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Commission members Peter Kaufman, LuAnn Zbinden, Mark Fraher, Stephen Cooney and Don Wilkes rejected the proposal because of concerns about &amp;quot;adverse effects upon the existing and probable future character of the neighborhood or its property values&amp;quot; and because &amp;quot;this specific site is not appropriate for this specific use.&amp;quot;</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21054">
		<![CDATA[ Commission members Peter Kaufman, LuAnn Zbinden, Mark Fraher, Stephen Cooney and Don Wilkes rejected the proposal because of concerns about &amp;quot;adverse effects upon the existing and probable future character of the neighborhood or its property values&amp;quot; and because &amp;quot;this specific site is not appropriate for this specific use.&amp;quot; ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>City sues Edison over wind energy lines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20202" title="City sues Edison over wind energy lines"/> 
	<id>.20202</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-27T12:50:04Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-27T12:50:04Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The city on Thursday announced it is taking legal action against Southern California Edison in order to prevent tall wind power lines from cutting through the city. 

The announcement was made at a press conference and rally held by the city and CARE (Citizens for the Alternate Routing of Electricity) ...&amp;quot;Under the existing agreements, the proposed power lines are too large and violate the agreements. Plain and simple - we do not believe that Southern California Edison has the legal right to place 198 foot transmission poles within a 150-foot right-of-way. We are suing Southern California Edison to prove this point.&amp;quot; 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20202">
		<![CDATA[ The city on Thursday announced it is taking legal action against Southern California Edison in order to prevent tall wind power lines from cutting through the city. 

The announcement was made at a press conference and rally held by the city and CARE (Citizens for the Alternate Routing of Electricity) ...&amp;quot;Under the existing agreements, the proposed power lines are too large and violate the agreements. Plain and simple - we do not believe that Southern California Edison has the legal right to place 198 foot transmission poles within a 150-foot right-of-way. We are suing Southern California Edison to prove this point.&amp;quot; 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Hearing Tuesday will decide future of Goshen wind turbine</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20131" title="Hearing Tuesday will decide future of Goshen wind turbine"/> 
	<id>.20131</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-23T14:47:26Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-23T14:47:26Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">While several Goshen residents spoke in favor of the application, others felt that the Optiwind design and placement is bad for the neighborhood. Elaine Frost resides on Beach Street near the proposed tower, and owns 150 acres of land adjacent to the Sewer District property. Frost is not convinced that the data submitted by Optiwind consultants is accurate, and she has joined with other residents to hire an attorney to help them oppose the plan.

&amp;quot;I call them the Not Quite True Crew,&amp;quot; Frost said of the experts and the reports that they submitted. &amp;quot;I believe that the appraisers were given specific information and visualization points that favored the applicant. They were inaccurate and selective.&amp;quot;
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20131">
		<![CDATA[ While several Goshen residents spoke in favor of the application, others felt that the Optiwind design and placement is bad for the neighborhood. Elaine Frost resides on Beach Street near the proposed tower, and owns 150 acres of land adjacent to the Sewer District property. Frost is not convinced that the data submitted by Optiwind consultants is accurate, and she has joined with other residents to hire an attorney to help them oppose the plan.

&amp;quot;I call them the Not Quite True Crew,&amp;quot; Frost said of the experts and the reports that they submitted. &amp;quot;I believe that the appraisers were given specific information and visualization points that favored the applicant. They were inaccurate and selective.&amp;quot;
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbines rising 300 feet proposed for Old Lyme Marsh </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20128" title="Wind turbines rising 300 feet proposed for Old Lyme Marsh "/> 
	<id>.20128</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-23T13:38:46Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-23T13:38:46Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A local developer has partnered with a former state representative and a self-proclaimed renewable energy expert to tackle an ambitious project that would bring two commercial wind turbines, each about 300 feet tall, to the salt marsh area north of Halls Road.

If built, the 3-megawatt wind-turbine project, coined the Huntley Wind Cooperative, would be one of the first in the state used for commercial purposes.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20128">
		<![CDATA[ A local developer has partnered with a former state representative and a self-proclaimed renewable energy expert to tackle an ambitious project that would bring two commercial wind turbines, each about 300 feet tall, to the salt marsh area north of Halls Road.

If built, the 3-megawatt wind-turbine project, coined the Huntley Wind Cooperative, would be one of the first in the state used for commercial purposes.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Goshen wind turbine generates comments</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19606" title="Goshen wind turbine generates comments"/> 
	<id>.19606</id> 
	<updated>2009-01-21T14:47:28Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-01-21T14:47:28Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Goshen Planning and Zoning Commission heard comments regarding the application by Optiwind, a Torrington based company, to erect the turbine on Brushy Hill Road. Optiwind was turned down previously, with the commission citing the lack of information relating to the impact of the turbine on area home values and the absence of noise data for the proposed structure.

Optiwind presented testimony from experts and company officials in support of its application.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19606">
		<![CDATA[ The Goshen Planning and Zoning Commission heard comments regarding the application by Optiwind, a Torrington based company, to erect the turbine on Brushy Hill Road. Optiwind was turned down previously, with the commission citing the lack of information relating to the impact of the turbine on area home values and the absence of noise data for the proposed structure.

Optiwind presented testimony from experts and company officials in support of its application.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Goshen Wind Plan Returns</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18975" title="Goshen Wind Plan Returns"/> 
	<id>.18975</id> 
	<updated>2008-11-26T15:50:54Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-11-26T15:50:54Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A proposed wind turbine on the grounds of the Woodridge Lake sewage treatment plant on Brush Hill Road might get a second wind, as the application is scheduled to be resubmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday. 
The turbine is being proposed by Optiwind, a Torrington company that bills its wind-energy equipment as &amp;quot;smaller, cheaper and more aesthetically pleasing&amp;quot; than typical three- pronged turbines used on large wind farms in states like California and Texas. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18975">
		<![CDATA[ A proposed wind turbine on the grounds of the Woodridge Lake sewage treatment plant on Brush Hill Road might get a second wind, as the application is scheduled to be resubmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday. 
The turbine is being proposed by Optiwind, a Torrington company that bills its wind-energy equipment as &amp;quot;smaller, cheaper and more aesthetically pleasing&amp;quot; than typical three- pronged turbines used on large wind farms in states like California and Texas. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Opposition to wind turbine in Goshen </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18202" title="Opposition to wind turbine in Goshen "/> 
	<id>.18202</id> 
	<updated>2008-10-01T15:00:22Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-10-01T15:00:22Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A proposed wind turbine on the grounds of the Woodridge Lake sewage treatment plant on Brush Hill Road in Goshen drew mostly opposition from residents who spoke during a public hearing on Tuesday before the Planning and Zoning Commission. ...More than 60 residents attended the hearing in the Goshen Center School cafeteria and only two spoke in favor of the proposal.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18202">
		<![CDATA[ A proposed wind turbine on the grounds of the Woodridge Lake sewage treatment plant on Brush Hill Road in Goshen drew mostly opposition from residents who spoke during a public hearing on Tuesday before the Planning and Zoning Commission. ...More than 60 residents attended the hearing in the Goshen Center School cafeteria and only two spoke in favor of the proposal. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>New company wants to harness area's wind power </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17732" title="New company wants to harness area's wind power "/> 
	<id>.17732</id> 
	<updated>2008-08-31T23:01:20Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-08-31T23:01:20Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A new wind energy company has moved into Torrington highlighting their medium-sized wind turbines, which they say are perfect for the moderately windy Connecticut landscape. 
Optiwind, located in the former Torrington Company building, wants to focus their efforts on providing suitable energy solutions for both public and private entities. Early next year, they are set to install one of their turbines at the Woodridge Lake Sewer District in Goshen. When this occurs, it will be the first commercial wind turbine in the state of Connecticut. ...It is about 200 feet tall and 72 feet in diameter, half the height of a regular industrial turbine.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17732">
		<![CDATA[ A new wind energy company has moved into Torrington highlighting their medium-sized wind turbines, which they say are perfect for the moderately windy Connecticut landscape. 
Optiwind, located in the former Torrington Company building, wants to focus their efforts on providing suitable energy solutions for both public and private entities. Early next year, they are set to install one of their turbines at the Woodridge Lake Sewer District in Goshen. When this occurs, it will be the first commercial wind turbine in the state of Connecticut. ...It is about 200 feet tall and 72 feet in diameter, half the height of a regular industrial turbine.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Bigger states balk at chipping in for N.H. transmission lines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17145" title="Bigger states balk at chipping in for N.H. transmission lines"/> 
	<id>.17145</id> 
	<updated>2008-08-01T11:10:32Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-08-01T11:10:32Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Governors of the six New England states met July 9 for their New England Governors Conference meeting in Boston to discuss energy and try to forge, among other things, an agreement on funding new transmission lines to bring electricity from remote wind and biomass power plants in Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire to the urban centers on the Eastern Seaboard.

The state chief executives met in private for what was reported to be some free and candid bargaining, but participants later confirmed that New Hampshire will likely have to go it alone if it wants expand transmission capability in Coos County in order to make renewable energy projects with a total of between 300 and 400 megawatts a reality.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17145">
		<![CDATA[ Governors of the six New England states met July 9 for their New England Governors Conference meeting in Boston to discuss energy and try to forge, among other things, an agreement on funding new transmission lines to bring electricity from remote wind and biomass power plants in Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire to the urban centers on the Eastern Seaboard.

The state chief executives met in private for what was reported to be some free and candid bargaining, but participants later confirmed that New Hampshire will likely have to go it alone if it wants expand transmission capability in Coos County in order to make renewable energy projects with a total of between 300 and 400 megawatts a reality.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Several towns consider ways to bring in wind turbines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16703" title="Several towns consider ways to bring in wind turbines"/> 
	<id>.16703</id> 
	<updated>2008-07-07T16:37:45Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-07-07T16:37:45Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Windmills may be more plentiful and produce power more readily in the vast stretches of California and Texas than in Connecticut, but several towns remain undeterred in their search for cheaper energy.
Some local officials, fed up with the rapidly rising cost of power, are considering zoning law changes to permit wind power turbines. It's the latest move by officials in Canaan, Goshen, Harwinton, Thomaston and Watertown to find less costly alternatives to heat schools and town office buildings. ...Zoning regulations and environmental concerns also present challenges. The aesthetics and environmental impacts of the enormous towers with huge spinning blades sometimes provokes opposition from residents even if they back renewable energy alternatives.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16703">
		<![CDATA[ Windmills may be more plentiful and produce power more readily in the vast stretches of California and Texas than in Connecticut, but several towns remain undeterred in their search for cheaper energy.
Some local officials, fed up with the rapidly rising cost of power, are considering zoning law changes to permit wind power turbines. It's the latest move by officials in Canaan, Goshen, Harwinton, Thomaston and Watertown to find less costly alternatives to heat schools and town office buildings. ...Zoning regulations and environmental concerns also present challenges. The aesthetics and environmental impacts of the enormous towers with huge spinning blades sometimes provokes opposition from residents even if they back renewable energy alternatives.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Transmission limits hamper renewable energy plans </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14583" title="Transmission limits hamper renewable energy plans "/> 
	<id>.14583</id> 
	<updated>2008-03-09T21:04:02Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-03-09T21:04:02Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">State and regional regulators acknowledge the hurdles - especially in northern New Hampshire - but don't have ready solutions. A bill before the New Hampshire Senate would have the state be ready to act if no regional solution is forthcoming.

ISO New England, which manages power for the region, is considering changing rules so more of the costs of transmission upgrades could be shared regionally. But as things stand now, backers of projects generally must pay for upgrades needed to connect them to the system.

&amp;quot;None of this is a real speedy process,&amp;quot; acknowledges Michael Harrington, senior regional policy adviser for the state Public Utilities Commission.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14583">
		<![CDATA[ State and regional regulators acknowledge the hurdles - especially in northern New Hampshire - but don't have ready solutions. A bill before the New Hampshire Senate would have the state be ready to act if no regional solution is forthcoming.

ISO New England, which manages power for the region, is considering changing rules so more of the costs of transmission upgrades could be shared regionally. But as things stand now, backers of projects generally must pay for upgrades needed to connect them to the system.

&amp;quot;None of this is a real speedy process,&amp;quot; acknowledges Michael Harrington, senior regional policy adviser for the state Public Utilities Commission.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Windmill dispute continues Public hearing to be continued February 6</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13756" title="Windmill dispute continues Public hearing to be continued February 6"/> 
	<id>.13756</id> 
	<updated>2008-01-24T14:16:12Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-01-24T14:16:12Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The potential approval of a wind turbine on Kurt Karpavich's Farm Circle property again provided an impassioned debate during the Planning &amp;amp; Zoning public hearing on Wednesday, January 16. ...The public hearing on the matter was closed and P&amp;amp;Z voted to table action on Mr. Karpavich's application.

Prior to the aforementioned decision, Farm Circle residents continued to plead with the members of P&amp;amp;Z for a resolution to the issue which will not allow Mr. Karpavich to have a wind turbine on his property. Following a sitewalk of Mr. Karpavich's property last month, members of P&amp;amp;Z still have yet to determine which area of Mr. Karpavich's property is best suited for the wind turbine. P&amp;amp;Z has tried to find a resolution to the issue which suits both parties, including surrounding neighbors, who have expressed their opposition to the wind turbine under any circumstances.

The wind turbine regulations were approved last fall when details of wind turbine approval was set according to various factors including height variance and setback distance, as well as minimum acreage requirements according to the residential zone.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13756">
		<![CDATA[ The potential approval of a wind turbine on Kurt Karpavich's Farm Circle property again provided an impassioned debate during the Planning &amp;amp; Zoning public hearing on Wednesday, January 16. ...The public hearing on the matter was closed and P&amp;amp;Z voted to table action on Mr. Karpavich's application.

Prior to the aforementioned decision, Farm Circle residents continued to plead with the members of P&amp;amp;Z for a resolution to the issue which will not allow Mr. Karpavich to have a wind turbine on his property. Following a sitewalk of Mr. Karpavich's property last month, members of P&amp;amp;Z still have yet to determine which area of Mr. Karpavich's property is best suited for the wind turbine. P&amp;amp;Z has tried to find a resolution to the issue which suits both parties, including surrounding neighbors, who have expressed their opposition to the wind turbine under any circumstances.

The wind turbine regulations were approved last fall when details of wind turbine approval was set according to various factors including height variance and setback distance, as well as minimum acreage requirements according to the residential zone.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
