	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c61+87?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c61+87?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Feds delay sage grouse decision until 2010 </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21798" title="Feds delay sage grouse decision until 2010 "/> 
	<id>.21798</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-26T12:53:46Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-26T12:53:46Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Federal officials are again delaying whether to list sage grouse in 11 Western states as threatened or endangered -- leaving in limbo until at least 2010 a spate of industries that could face sweeping restrictions if the bird is protected.

The chicken-sized grouse ranges from Montana to California alongside livestock grazing, oil and gas drilling and an increasing number of wind power turbines.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21798">
		<![CDATA[ Federal officials are again delaying whether to list sage grouse in 11 Western states as threatened or endangered -- leaving in limbo until at least 2010 a spate of industries that could face sweeping restrictions if the bird is protected.

The chicken-sized grouse ranges from Montana to California alongside livestock grazing, oil and gas drilling and an increasing number of wind power turbines.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Report aims to help small developers own local wind projects</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17959" title="Report aims to help small developers own local wind projects"/> 
	<id>.17959</id> 
	<updated>2008-09-12T19:12:25Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-09-12T19:12:25Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The current production tax credit provides a 10-year, 2.1 cent-per-kilowatt-hour tax write-off.

But the report argues a key difficulty facing prospective community wind developers is their lack of a large enough tax liability to take full advantage of the federal tax incentives, which makes it financially difficult to complete projects.

Larger wind developers, meanwhile, used the tax break to shatter an industry record in 2007 by installing 5,244 megawatts of wind generation nationwide.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17959">
		<![CDATA[ The current production tax credit provides a 10-year, 2.1 cent-per-kilowatt-hour tax write-off.

But the report argues a key difficulty facing prospective community wind developers is their lack of a large enough tax liability to take full advantage of the federal tax incentives, which makes it financially difficult to complete projects.

Larger wind developers, meanwhile, used the tax break to shatter an industry record in 2007 by installing 5,244 megawatts of wind generation nationwide.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>The new gold rush</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15409" title="The new gold rush"/> 
	<id>.15409</id> 
	<updated>2008-04-20T17:27:02Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-04-20T17:27:02Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A new breed of prospector is scouring Montana's hills, but wind is the resource it seeks.

Before these prospectors harvest that gold in the sky, however, they've got to secure the real key to the mother lode - permission from landowners to build towering wind turbines the size of a Boeing 747.

Across the state, from Circle in the east to Ennis in the west, the race is on to lock up the best sites by courting landowners and sealing deals for exclusive rights to explore and develop wind power. 

Hundreds of thousands of acres already are under lease to foreign and U.S. wind developers.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15409">
		<![CDATA[ A new breed of prospector is scouring Montana's hills, but wind is the resource it seeks.

Before these prospectors harvest that gold in the sky, however, they've got to secure the real key to the mother lode - permission from landowners to build towering wind turbines the size of a Boeing 747.

Across the state, from Circle in the east to Ennis in the west, the race is on to lock up the best sites by courting landowners and sealing deals for exclusive rights to explore and develop wind power. 

Hundreds of thousands of acres already are under lease to foreign and U.S. wind developers.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Showdown ahead over wind energy tax break</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14319" title="Showdown ahead over wind energy tax break"/> 
	<id>.14319</id> 
	<updated>2008-02-24T14:06:25Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-02-24T14:06:25Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Montana's fledgling wind energy industry is keeping its fingers crossed that the House will approve legislation next week that would extend a tax break that has helped the industry compete financially with energy generated from fossil fuels. ...In the Senate, Republicans were able to block the legislation by one vote. President Bush threatened to veto it because it would have been paid for by canceling tax breaks that now go to oil and gas companies.

Rehberg and the Republicans say the funding plan is a tax increase that would get passed on to consumers. Democrats say it better reflects the nation's shifting energy priorities and that the companies can well afford it. Exxon Mobil had a $41 billion profit last year, the largest ever posted by a U.S. company.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14319">
		<![CDATA[ Montana's fledgling wind energy industry is keeping its fingers crossed that the House will approve legislation next week that would extend a tax break that has helped the industry compete financially with energy generated from fossil fuels. ...In the Senate, Republicans were able to block the legislation by one vote. President Bush threatened to veto it because it would have been paid for by canceling tax breaks that now go to oil and gas companies.

Rehberg and the Republicans say the funding plan is a tax increase that would get passed on to consumers. Democrats say it better reflects the nation's shifting energy priorities and that the companies can well afford it. Exxon Mobil had a $41 billion profit last year, the largest ever posted by a U.S. company.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Tax credits add wealth to foreign wind firms</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12585" title="Tax credits add wealth to foreign wind firms"/> 
	<id>.12585</id> 
	<updated>2007-11-08T22:29:44Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-11-08T22:29:44Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">In a nutshell, if you have taxable income, it is reduced by $19 for every megawatt of wind electricity for every hour it is produced. For the top five wind farm owners listed above that comes to about $10 billion. Those $10 billion are not shifted to the deficit. They are shifted to regular taxpayers. Yup, even though none of the top five produce any electricity consumed in Montana, you still get to pay for it with your tax dollars.
And what did you get for your tax dollars? Not much. By and large, nothing got built. Existing generation was bought, and the tax incentives were activated, making you a conscripted investor in their acquisition schemes and dreams. Guess that's another loophole Congressman Rehberg can work on with Sens. Tester and Baucus. Of course, that $10 billion is gone with the wind. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12585">
		<![CDATA[ In a nutshell, if you have taxable income, it is reduced by $19 for every megawatt of wind electricity for every hour it is produced. For the top five wind farm owners listed above that comes to about $10 billion. Those $10 billion are not shifted to the deficit. They are shifted to regular taxpayers. Yup, even though none of the top five produce any electricity consumed in Montana, you still get to pay for it with your tax dollars.
And what did you get for your tax dollars? Not much. By and large, nothing got built. Existing generation was bought, and the tax incentives were activated, making you a conscripted investor in their acquisition schemes and dreams. Guess that's another loophole Congressman Rehberg can work on with Sens. Tester and Baucus. Of course, that $10 billion is gone with the wind. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Alternative energy package advances</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10252" title="Alternative energy package advances"/> 
	<id>.10252</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-20T11:19:06Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-20T11:19:06Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A panel chaired by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus on Tuesday approved an energy-tax package designed to boost alternative energy production and conservation - partially at the expense of big oil-and-gas producers.

&amp;quot;This is a significant victory in our efforts to become more energy independent,&amp;quot; said Baucus, D-Mont., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee. &amp;quot;We have more to do to address climate change, lower gas prices at the pump and wean America off of foreign sources of energy.&amp;quot;

The Finance Committee approved the $28.5 billion, 10-year tax package, which is expected to become part of a larger energy bill before the U.S. Senate this week.

The package includes tax credits to encourage production of wind power, solar power, gas-electric hybrid cars, biodiesel fuel and &amp;quot;cellulosic&amp;quot; ethanol, which is produced from agricultural waste products. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10252">
		<![CDATA[ A panel chaired by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus on Tuesday approved an energy-tax package designed to boost alternative energy production and conservation - partially at the expense of big oil-and-gas producers.

&amp;quot;This is a significant victory in our efforts to become more energy independent,&amp;quot; said Baucus, D-Mont., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee. &amp;quot;We have more to do to address climate change, lower gas prices at the pump and wean America off of foreign sources of energy.&amp;quot;

The Finance Committee approved the $28.5 billion, 10-year tax package, which is expected to become part of a larger energy bill before the U.S. Senate this week.

The package includes tax credits to encourage production of wind power, solar power, gas-electric hybrid cars, biodiesel fuel and &amp;quot;cellulosic&amp;quot; ethanol, which is produced from agricultural waste products.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>MSU professor creates one of nationâ€™s largest databases for wind energy research</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4395" title="MSU professor creates one of nation&#226;€™s largest databases for wind energy research"/> 
	<id>.4395</id> 
	<updated>2006-08-11T19:51:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-08-11T19:51:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Bozeman - In a little lab on the campus of Montana State University, John Mandell, Dan Samborsky, and scores of students, have been breaking things to advance the field of wind energy. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4395">
		<![CDATA[ Bozeman - In a little lab on the campus of Montana State University, John Mandell, Dan Samborsky, and scores of students, have been breaking things to advance the field of wind energy. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Areas of power grid congestion ID'd</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4335" title="Areas of power grid congestion ID'd"/> 
	<id>.4335</id> 
	<updated>2006-08-08T13:17:36Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-08-08T13:17:36Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">WASHINGTON &#226;€” Southern California and the urban centers from Northern Virginia to New York face the most critical power grid problems, but such remote areas as Montana and the Dakotas may need new transmission lines in the near future, an Energy Department report warns.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4335">
		<![CDATA[ WASHINGTON &#226;€” Southern California and the urban centers from Northern Virginia to New York face the most critical power grid problems, but such remote areas as Montana and the Dakotas may need new transmission lines in the near future, an Energy Department report warns.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Transmitting wind could permanently change energy rules</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13433" title="Transmitting wind could permanently change energy rules"/> 
	<id>.13433</id> 
	<updated>2008-01-04T23:55:04Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-01-04T23:55:04Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">[P]urchasers of green energy will find that wind energy produced in Pennsylvania is much more expensive than wind produced in, say, Montana. 

This mainly has to do with the location of wind resources. Montana has more areas with a higher sustained four wind than Pennsylvania. Also, since Montana is less densely populated, there are fewer troubles in siting the windfarms. 

The drawback, obviously, is that Montana is very far away, and electricity grids lose power over long distances. However, some researchers in Europe claim to have found a solution: DC current. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13433">
		<![CDATA[ [P]urchasers of green energy will find that wind energy produced in Pennsylvania is much more expensive than wind produced in, say, Montana. 

This mainly has to do with the location of wind resources. Montana has more areas with a higher sustained four wind than Pennsylvania. Also, since Montana is less densely populated, there are fewer troubles in siting the windfarms. 

The drawback, obviously, is that Montana is very far away, and electricity grids lose power over long distances. However, some researchers in Europe claim to have found a solution: DC current. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Energy rhetoric versus reality</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12029" title="Energy rhetoric versus reality"/> 
	<id>.12029</id> 
	<updated>2007-10-02T15:29:46Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-10-02T15:29:46Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">We're all for energy conservation and alternative energy sources being brought online as part of an overall U.S. energy strategy that also includes developing traditional energy sources, regardless of opposition from the enviro-regulation litigation industry.

But reality has to fit in that strategy somewhere, not just feel-good rhetoric.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12029">
		<![CDATA[ We're all for energy conservation and alternative energy sources being brought online as part of an overall U.S. energy strategy that also includes developing traditional energy sources, regardless of opposition from the enviro-regulation litigation industry.

But reality has to fit in that strategy somewhere, not just feel-good rhetoric.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind energy proposal could be step in right direction</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10064" title="Wind energy proposal could be step in right direction"/> 
	<id>.10064</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-10T14:44:19Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-10T14:44:19Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Rahall plan may not be the final answer, but a gold-rush mentality that promotes such huge numbers of heavily-subsidized, industrial-scale wind farms with no controls on industry is not a good answer either. As a first-draft work-in-progress, Rahall's proposal might just be a step in the right direction.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10064">
		<![CDATA[ The Rahall plan may not be the final answer, but a gold-rush mentality that promotes such huge numbers of heavily-subsidized, industrial-scale wind farms with no controls on industry is not a good answer either. As a first-draft work-in-progress, Rahall's proposal might just be a step in the right direction.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Limitations of wind energy concern electricity providers</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/2885" title="Limitations of wind energy concern electricity providers"/> 
	<id>.2885</id> 
	<updated>2006-05-08T11:35:14Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-05-08T11:35:14Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">...because of reliability problems, wind power must be supported by more traditional and reliable sources of generation, such as hydroelectric, coal-fired, nuclear, and natural gas generation. Wind generation is intermittent and sometimes poses challenges to load schedulers who manage the transmission grid systems.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/2885">
		<![CDATA[ ...because of reliability problems, wind power must be supported by more traditional and reliable sources of generation, such as hydroelectric, coal-fired, nuclear, and natural gas generation. Wind generation is intermittent and sometimes poses challenges to load schedulers who manage the transmission grid systems. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
