    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c59+58?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Vestas on crest of alternative energy wave</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12354</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Canadian investors looking for exposure to the booming alternative energy sector have a handful of domestic players to choose from, but the local pickings are pretty slim and most of the companies are small.

So why not look overseas, to one of the green behemoths that has sprung up on the international scene? ...The fast-growing U.S. wind power industry, driven by favourable government tax policy, is Vestas' largest current market. ...Some analysts are also urging caution over Vestas' high price.

&quot;We find the shares are fundamentally overvalued,&quot; said analyst Christian Nagstrup of Jyske Bank, a Danish financial institution.

The biggest risk he sees at Vestas is a bottleneck in getting parts to build the turbines. Subcontractors have been slow in delivering key components, and that could slow delivery of complete turbines, Mr. Nagstrup said in a recent report.


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Canadian investors looking for exposure to the booming alternative energy sector have a handful of domestic players to choose from, but the local pickings are pretty slim and most of the companies are small.

So why not look overseas, to one of the green behemoths that has sprung up on the international scene? ...The fast-growing U.S. wind power industry, driven by favourable government tax policy, is Vestas' largest current market. ...Some analysts are also urging caution over Vestas' high price.

&quot;We find the shares are fundamentally overvalued,&quot; said analyst Christian Nagstrup of Jyske Bank, a Danish financial institution.

The biggest risk he sees at Vestas is a bottleneck in getting parts to build the turbines. Subcontractors have been slow in delivering key components, and that could slow delivery of complete turbines, Mr. Nagstrup said in a recent report.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12354</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Saving sunshine could soon be the law</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12294</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The question is no longer &quot;Who has seen the wind?&quot; but &quot;Who owns the wind?&quot;

In the developing world of renewable energy, can neighbouring wind farms steal from each other? What if you put solar panels on your roof and your neighbour plants a tree that blocks them from the sun? Do you have a right to solar access?

These aren't just philosophical questions, but real-life challenges that are already lining lawyers' pockets in Canada and Europe.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The question is no longer &quot;Who has seen the wind?&quot; but &quot;Who owns the wind?&quot;

In the developing world of renewable energy, can neighbouring wind farms steal from each other? What if you put solar panels on your roof and your neighbour plants a tree that blocks them from the sun? Do you have a right to solar access?

These aren't just philosophical questions, but real-life challenges that are already lining lawyers' pockets in Canada and Europe.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12294</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Blown over</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/8083</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ High wind-power production in Germany one Saturday night helped extend a blackout across Europe. 

Last month, the Conservative government joined the long line of governments around the world subsidizing the production of wind power. Meanwhile, new information about wind power from Europe raises the spectre of unexpected blackout risks, high costs, unreliable production and even questionable environmental benefits. 

Concerns over wind power used to focus on whether enough wind would blow to keep wind generators busy and electric power grids supplied. Now, after a major power blackout in Europe in November that left 15 million households in the dark, concerns over wind power come from an entirely opposite direction – fear that wind power can unpredictably produce more power than a system can handle. 


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>High wind-power production in Germany one Saturday night helped extend a blackout across Europe. 

Last month, the Conservative government joined the long line of governments around the world subsidizing the production of wind power. Meanwhile, new information about wind power from Europe raises the spectre of unexpected blackout risks, high costs, unreliable production and even questionable environmental benefits. 

Concerns over wind power used to focus on whether enough wind would blow to keep wind generators busy and electric power grids supplied. Now, after a major power blackout in Europe in November that left 15 million households in the dark, concerns over wind power come from an entirely opposite direction – fear that wind power can unpredictably produce more power than a system can handle. 


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/8083</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Italy’s Enel to build wind farms in Kansas and Newfoundland</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7203</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Enel SpA, Italy’s largest utility, said Friday it will build two wind farms in the United States and Canada with a combined capacity of 277 megawatts as part of a €4 billion (US$5.2 billion) investment in renewable energy. 

Enel said a 250 megawatt capacity wind farm will be built in Smoky Hills, Kansas, and a 27 megawatt plant in Newfoundland.... 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Enel SpA, Italy’s largest utility, said Friday it will build two wind farms in the United States and Canada with a combined capacity of 277 megawatts as part of a €4 billion (US$5.2 billion) investment in renewable energy. 

Enel said a 250 megawatt capacity wind farm will be built in Smoky Hills, Kansas, and a 27 megawatt plant in Newfoundland.... 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7203</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>UN talks split on date for climate fight rules</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6217</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A U.N. conference working to fix long-term rules to fight global warming beyond 2012 &quot;as soon as possible&quot; was split on Tuesday over whether that meant an accord should be struck in 2008, 2009 or even 2010. 

Industrial investors, weighing options ranging from coal-fired power plants to wind energy, are frustrated at the possibility of years of uncertainty about rules for fossil fuel emissions upon which carbon markets depend. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A U.N. conference working to fix long-term rules to fight global warming beyond 2012 &quot;as soon as possible&quot; was split on Tuesday over whether that meant an accord should be struck in 2008, 2009 or even 2010. 

Industrial investors, weighing options ranging from coal-fired power plants to wind energy, are frustrated at the possibility of years of uncertainty about rules for fossil fuel emissions upon which carbon markets depend. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6217</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Can planting trees really give you a clear carbon conscience?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5628</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Carbon offset schemes are designed to neutralise the effects of the carbon dioxide our activities produce by investing in projects that cut emissions elsewhere. They work through the rapidly growing trade in carbon credits, each worth the equivalent of a tonne of carbon. Offset companies typically buy carbon credits from projects that plant trees or encourage a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy. They sell credits to individuals and companies who want to go &quot;carbon neutral&quot;. Some climate experts say offsets are dangerous because they dissuade people from changing their behaviour. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Carbon offset schemes are designed to neutralise the effects of the carbon dioxide our activities produce by investing in projects that cut emissions elsewhere. They work through the rapidly growing trade in carbon credits, each worth the equivalent of a tonne of carbon. Offset companies typically buy carbon credits from projects that plant trees or encourage a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy. They sell credits to individuals and companies who want to go &quot;carbon neutral&quot;. Some climate experts say offsets are dangerous because they dissuade people from changing their behaviour. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5628</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>You feel better, but is your carbon offset just hot air?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5625</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Green consumers and businesses who want to neutralise their carbon emissions face being ripped off by unscrupulous operators who exploit the growing market in carbon offset schemes, a Guardian investigation has revealed. 

The surge in interest in such schemes, which invest millions of pounds in forestry and clean energy projects in the developing world, has created a lucrative market in carbon, which is unregulated and subject to little scrutiny. Campaigners and analysts say independent standards are urgently needed to protect consumers and to ensure the promised carbon savings are delivered. Francis Sullivan, a carbon offset expert who led attempts by banking group HSBC to neutralise its emissions, said: “There will be individuals and companies out there who think they’re doing the right thing but they’re not. I am sure that people are buying offsets in this unregulated market that are not credible. I am sure there are people buying nothing more than hot air.” 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Green consumers and businesses who want to neutralise their carbon emissions face being ripped off by unscrupulous operators who exploit the growing market in carbon offset schemes, a Guardian investigation has revealed. 

The surge in interest in such schemes, which invest millions of pounds in forestry and clean energy projects in the developing world, has created a lucrative market in carbon, which is unregulated and subject to little scrutiny. Campaigners and analysts say independent standards are urgently needed to protect consumers and to ensure the promised carbon savings are delivered. Francis Sullivan, a carbon offset expert who led attempts by banking group HSBC to neutralise its emissions, said: “There will be individuals and companies out there who think they’re doing the right thing but they’re not. I am sure that people are buying offsets in this unregulated market that are not credible. I am sure there are people buying nothing more than hot air.” 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5625</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind may generate 30 pct of electricity by 2030-study</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5220</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:42:01 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ OSLO, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Wind power could generate almost 30 percent of the world's electricity by 2030 and is growing faster than any other clean energy source, a wind business group and environmental lobby Greenpeace said on Wednesday. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>OSLO, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Wind power could generate almost 30 percent of the world's electricity by 2030 and is growing faster than any other clean energy source, a wind business group and environmental lobby Greenpeace said on Wednesday. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5220</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Everything You Wanted To Know About Solar Power and Were Afraid To Ask</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4891</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Canadian manufacturer of solar cells and modules Photowatt (PHWT) filed to go public last week; its prospectus contains an overview of the renewable energy industry, and trends in solar energy.  The excerpt below is from the company's F-1 filing: ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Canadian manufacturer of solar cells and modules Photowatt (PHWT) filed to go public last week; its prospectus contains an overview of the renewable energy industry, and trends in solar energy.  The excerpt below is from the company's F-1 filing:</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4891</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>WEO shows rising energy demand to 2030</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/736</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ But world energy resources are adequate to meet this sustained growth trend because global oil reserves today exceed the cumulative projected production to 2030, IEA said. This optimistic outlook, however, is based on a reference scenario that IEA describes as &quot;unsustainable.&quot;
 
Under that reference scenario, primary world energy demand increases by an average rate of 1.6%/year, with fossil fuels accounting for 83% of the projected increase. By 2030, the world consumes 16.3 billion tonnes of oil equivalent (toe)/year5.5 billion toe more than it does todaywith more than two thirds of energy use coming from developing countries.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>But world energy resources are adequate to meet this sustained growth trend because global oil reserves today exceed the cumulative projected production to 2030, IEA said. This optimistic outlook, however, is based on a reference scenario that IEA describes as &quot;unsustainable.&quot;
 
Under that reference scenario, primary world energy demand increases by an average rate of 1.6%/year, with fossil fuels accounting for 83% of the projected increase. By 2030, the world consumes 16.3 billion tonnes of oil equivalent (toe)/year5.5 billion toe more than it does todaywith more than two thirds of energy use coming from developing countries.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/736</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Summary of recent research on adverse heath effects of wind turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23709</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This document provides a useful compilation of recent research pertaining to the impact of wind turbines on human health. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This document provides a useful compilation of recent research pertaining to the impact of wind turbines on human health.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23709</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Public health and noise exposure: the importance of low frequency noise</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13107</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This paper on Infrasound and Low Frequency Noise Dose responses, was presented at the Inter-Noise 2007 conference held in Istanbul, Turkey August 28-31, 2007. The authors are Mariana Alves-Pereira and Nuno A. A. Castelo Branco of the Erisa-Universidade Lusofona, Lisbon, Portugal and the Center of Human Performance, Alverca, Portugal.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This paper on Infrasound and Low Frequency Noise Dose responses, was presented at the Inter-Noise 2007 conference held in Istanbul, Turkey August 28-31, 2007. The authors are Mariana Alves-Pereira and Nuno A. A. Castelo Branco of the Erisa-Universidade Lusofona, Lisbon, Portugal and the Center of Human Performance, Alverca, Portugal. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13107</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine Accidents: Update from Caithness Wind Farms Information Forum</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1318</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A compilation as of November 1, 2006 of turbine accidents in the USA and abroad by accident type, date, site, state/country and turbine model. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A compilation as of November 1, 2006 of turbine accidents in the USA and abroad by accident type, date, site, state/country and turbine model. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1318</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>International Experience With Implementing Wind Energy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1740</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <br>
International Experience With Implementing Wind 
Energy examines the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages 
of wind generation. In addition, the report 
explores infrastructure issues, public attitudes toward 
wind development, and the various policy instruments 
used to support the development of wind energy in 
countries that are leaders in implementing wind energy.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
International Experience With Implementing Wind 
Energy examines the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages 
of wind generation. In addition, the report 
explores infrastructure issues, public attitudes toward 
wind development, and the various policy instruments 
used to support the development of wind energy in 
countries that are leaders in implementing wind energy. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1740</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Working Paper: Utility-scale Wind Power: Impacts of Increased Penetration</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5887</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This working paper is made available by the Resource and Environmental economics and 
Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group at the University of Victoria. REPA working 
papers have not been peer reviewed and contain preliminary research findings. They shall 
not be cited without the expressed written consent of the author(s). <br>
<br>
<strong>Editor's Note:</strong> The authors’ conclusion regarding ‘effective capacity’, i.e. the measure of 
a generator’s contribution to system reliability  that is tied to meeting peak loads,  is that it “is difficult to generalize, as it is a highly site-specific quantity determined by the correlation between wind resource and load” and that ‘values range from 26 % to 0% of rated capacity.”  This conclusion is based, in part, on a 2003 study by the California Energy Commission that estimated that three wind farm aggregates- Altamont, San Gorgonio and Tehachpi, which collectively represent 75% of California’s deployed wind capacity- had relative capacity credits of 26.0%, 23.9% and 22.0% respectively.  It is noteworthy that during California’s Summer ’06 energy crunch, as has been widely publicized in the press, wind power produced at 254.6 MW (10.2% of wind’s rated capacity of 2,500MW) at the time of peak demand (on July 24th) and over the preceding seven days (July 17-23)  produced at 89.4 to 113.0 MW, averaging only 99.1 MW at the time of peak demand or just 4% of rated capacity.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This working paper is made available by the Resource and Environmental economics and 
Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group at the University of Victoria. REPA working 
papers have not been peer reviewed and contain preliminary research findings. They shall 
not be cited without the expressed written consent of the author(s). 

Editor's Note: The authors’ conclusion regarding ‘effective capacity’, i.e. the measure of 
a generator’s contribution to system reliability  that is tied to meeting peak loads,  is that it “is difficult to generalize, as it is a highly site-specific quantity determined by the correlation between wind resource and load” and that ‘values range from 26 % to 0% of rated capacity.”  This conclusion is based, in part, on a 2003 study by the California Energy Commission that estimated that three wind farm aggregates- Altamont, San Gorgonio and Tehachpi, which collectively represent 75% of California’s deployed wind capacity- had relative capacity credits of 26.0%, 23.9% and 22.0% respectively.  It is noteworthy that during California’s Summer ’06 energy crunch, as has been widely publicized in the press, wind power produced at 254.6 MW (10.2% of wind’s rated capacity of 2,500MW) at the time of peak demand (on July 24th) and over the preceding seven days (July 17-23)  produced at 89.4 to 113.0 MW, averaging only 99.1 MW at the time of peak demand or just 4% of rated capacity.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5887</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Who could object to wind power?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18965</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind power can't survive without massive subsidies, courtesy of you and me. &quot;If these hidden subsidies were taken away, there would not be a single wind turbine built in Britain,&quot; says David Bellamy, a well-known environmentalist who has been tramping the Scottish countryside to oppose a massive wind project there. ...When will we stop pouring billions into wind? I have no idea. Politicians really love their turbines. Meantime, that soft whooshing sound you hear is your friendly green government, vacuuming money out of your pockets.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind power can't survive without massive subsidies, courtesy of you and me. &quot;If these hidden subsidies were taken away, there would not be a single wind turbine built in Britain,&quot; says David Bellamy, a well-known environmentalist who has been tramping the Scottish countryside to oppose a massive wind project there. ...When will we stop pouring billions into wind? I have no idea. Politicians really love their turbines. Meantime, that soft whooshing sound you hear is your friendly green government, vacuuming money out of your pockets.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18965</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Has the sun set on clean tech?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18760</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Once a booming industry thanks to sky-high oil prices, the feel-good trend, carbon reduction and subsidies, the financial crisis has pushed investors to give up on green energies, and like the dot-com bubble of 2000, some analysts say it's about to burst. ...&quot;I think economic reality will kill the green industry,&quot; said Mr. Buckee, who now lives in Britain and lectures on climate change.

Solar energy isn't alone in its woes. Wind, biomass, biofuel and other &quot;clean-tech&quot; companies are getting pasted too as the financial crisis sends investors fleeing from technology names, dries up credit and freezes the IPO market.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Once a booming industry thanks to sky-high oil prices, the feel-good trend, carbon reduction and subsidies, the financial crisis has pushed investors to give up on green energies, and like the dot-com bubble of 2000, some analysts say it's about to burst. ...&quot;I think economic reality will kill the green industry,&quot; said Mr. Buckee, who now lives in Britain and lectures on climate change.

Solar energy isn't alone in its woes. Wind, biomass, biofuel and other &quot;clean-tech&quot; companies are getting pasted too as the financial crisis sends investors fleeing from technology names, dries up credit and freezes the IPO market.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18760</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>The carbon tax experience - a cautionary tale </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14632</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In 1996, Denmark went on to hit industrial producers with a $15 per tonne carbon tax, initially neutralized by cuts in payroll taxes. 

What happened? 

By 1998, manufacturers started shutting their doors due to high energy prices, and overall Danish carbon tax revenues started to fall along with manufacturing jobs. 

At the same time, the cost of government programs rose significantly. 
The government's solution incredibly was to - wait for it - subsidize electricity to select manufacturers and raise income taxes by lowering the income threshold on the country's top marginal rate. 

By 2001, with economic growth hovering at one- seventh-of-one-percent, Danes making over CAD$50,000 paid 59 per cent of their income in taxes and had to cope with record electricity prices. The entire debacle led to a change of government that year, with the incoming government promising a tax freeze, followed by a tax reduction - including those taxes on energy.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In 1996, Denmark went on to hit industrial producers with a $15 per tonne carbon tax, initially neutralized by cuts in payroll taxes. 

What happened? 

By 1998, manufacturers started shutting their doors due to high energy prices, and overall Danish carbon tax revenues started to fall along with manufacturing jobs. 

At the same time, the cost of government programs rose significantly. 
The government's solution incredibly was to - wait for it - subsidize electricity to select manufacturers and raise income taxes by lowering the income threshold on the country's top marginal rate. 

By 2001, with economic growth hovering at one- seventh-of-one-percent, Danes making over CAD$50,000 paid 59 per cent of their income in taxes and had to cope with record electricity prices. The entire debacle led to a change of government that year, with the incoming government promising a tax freeze, followed by a tax reduction - including those taxes on energy. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14632</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind energy : beware, turbulence ahead</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11203</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind farm projects are growing like mushrooms after a rainy day, but the air is turbulent in the wind industry. Industrial wind farms are not as nice and green as promoters want us to believe. Like an opponent puts it : &quot;There is more here than immediately meets the eye with industrial wind generators, and often the devil is in the details.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind farm projects are growing like mushrooms after a rainy day, but the air is turbulent in the wind industry. Industrial wind farms are not as nice and green as promoters want us to believe. Like an opponent puts it : &quot;There is more here than immediately meets the eye with industrial wind generators, and often the devil is in the details.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11203</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
