	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c59+118?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c59+118?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Vestas on crest of alternative energy wave</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12354" title="Vestas on crest of alternative energy wave"/> 
	<id>.12354</id> 
	<updated>2007-10-25T16:43:02Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-10-25T16:43:02Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Canadian investors looking for exposure to the booming alternative energy sector have a handful of domestic players to choose from, but the local pickings are pretty slim and most of the companies are small.

So why not look overseas, to one of the green behemoths that has sprung up on the international scene? ...The fast-growing U.S. wind power industry, driven by favourable government tax policy, is Vestas' largest current market. ...Some analysts are also urging caution over Vestas' high price.

&amp;quot;We find the shares are fundamentally overvalued,&amp;quot; said analyst Christian Nagstrup of Jyske Bank, a Danish financial institution.

The biggest risk he sees at Vestas is a bottleneck in getting parts to build the turbines. Subcontractors have been slow in delivering key components, and that could slow delivery of complete turbines, Mr. Nagstrup said in a recent report.


</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12354">
		<![CDATA[ Canadian investors looking for exposure to the booming alternative energy sector have a handful of domestic players to choose from, but the local pickings are pretty slim and most of the companies are small.

So why not look overseas, to one of the green behemoths that has sprung up on the international scene? ...The fast-growing U.S. wind power industry, driven by favourable government tax policy, is Vestas' largest current market. ...Some analysts are also urging caution over Vestas' high price.

&amp;quot;We find the shares are fundamentally overvalued,&amp;quot; said analyst Christian Nagstrup of Jyske Bank, a Danish financial institution.

The biggest risk he sees at Vestas is a bottleneck in getting parts to build the turbines. Subcontractors have been slow in delivering key components, and that could slow delivery of complete turbines, Mr. Nagstrup said in a recent report.


 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Less For More: The Rube Goldberg Nature of Industrial Wind Development</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7013" title="Less For More: The Rube Goldberg Nature of Industrial Wind Development"/> 
	<id>.7013</id> 
	<updated>2006-12-20T18:42:30Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-12-20T18:42:30Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">
Rube Goldberg would admire the utter purity of the pretensions of wind technology in 
pursuit of a safer modern world, claiming to be saving the environment while wreaking 
havoc upon it. But even he might be astonished by the spin of wind industry spokesmen. 
Consider the comments made by the American Wind Industry Association.s Christina 
Real de Azua in the wake of the virtual nonperformance of California.s more than 13,000 
wind turbines in mitigating the electricity crisis precipitated by last July.s .heat storm.. 
.You really don.t count on wind energy as capacity,. she said. .It is different from other 
technologies because it can.t be dispatched.. (84) The press reported her comments 
solemnly without question, without even a risible chortle. Because they perceive time to 
be running out on fossil fuels, and the lure of non-polluting wind power is so seductive, 
otherwise sensible people are promoting it at any cost, without investigating potential 
negative consequences-- and with no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental 
history or grid operations. &amp;lt;
&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;
&amp;gt;

Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the 
renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and 
public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial 
wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting 
emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly 
increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable 
power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish 
for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to 
be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could 
otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts 
from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened 
policy. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7013">
		<![CDATA[ 
Rube Goldberg would admire the utter purity of the pretensions of wind technology in 
pursuit of a safer modern world, claiming to be saving the environment while wreaking 
havoc upon it. But even he might be astonished by the spin of wind industry spokesmen. 
Consider the comments made by the American Wind Industry Association.s Christina 
Real de Azua in the wake of the virtual nonperformance of California.s more than 13,000 
wind turbines in mitigating the electricity crisis precipitated by last July.s .heat storm.. 
.You really don.t count on wind energy as capacity,. she said. .It is different from other 
technologies because it can.t be dispatched.. (84) The press reported her comments 
solemnly without question, without even a risible chortle. Because they perceive time to 
be running out on fossil fuels, and the lure of non-polluting wind power is so seductive, 
otherwise sensible people are promoting it at any cost, without investigating potential 
negative consequences-- and with no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental 
history or grid operations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the 
renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and 
public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial 
wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting 
emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly 
increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable 
power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish 
for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to 
be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could 
otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts 
from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened 
policy.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>International Experience With Implementing Wind Energy</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/1740" title="International Experience With Implementing Wind Energy"/> 
	<id>.1740</id> 
	<updated>2006-02-01T05:00:00Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-02-01T05:00:00Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">
International Experience With Implementing Wind 
Energy examines the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages 
of wind generation. In addition, the report 
explores infrastructure issues, public attitudes toward 
wind development, and the various policy instruments 
used to support the development of wind energy in 
countries that are leaders in implementing wind energy. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/1740">
		<![CDATA[ &lt;br&gt;
International Experience With Implementing Wind 
Energy examines the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages 
of wind generation. In addition, the report 
explores infrastructure issues, public attitudes toward 
wind development, and the various policy instruments 
used to support the development of wind energy in 
countries that are leaders in implementing wind energy.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Working Paper: Utility-scale Wind Power: Impacts of Increased Penetration</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5887" title="Working Paper: Utility-scale Wind Power: Impacts of Increased Penetration"/> 
	<id>.5887</id> 
	<updated>2005-06-01T00:00:00Z</updated> 
	<published>2005-06-01T00:00:00Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">This working paper is made available by the Resource and Environmental economics and 
Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group at the University of Victoria. REPA working 
papers have not been peer reviewed and contain preliminary research findings. They shall 
not be cited without the expressed written consent of the author(s). 

Editor's Note: The authors&#226; conclusion regarding &#226;effective capacity&#226;, i.e. the measure of 
a generator&#226;s contribution to system reliability  that is tied to meeting peak loads,  is that it &#226;is difficult to generalize, as it is a highly site-specific quantity determined by the correlation between wind resource and load&#226; and that &#226;values range from 26 % to 0% of rated capacity.&#226;  This conclusion is based, in part, on a 2003 study by the California Energy Commission that estimated that three wind farm aggregates- Altamont, San Gorgonio and Tehachpi, which collectively represent 75% of California&#226;s deployed wind capacity- had relative capacity credits of 26.0%, 23.9% and 22.0% respectively.  It is noteworthy that during California&#226;s Summer &#226;06 energy crunch, as has been widely publicized in the press, wind power produced at 254.6 MW (10.2% of wind&#226;s rated capacity of 2,500MW) at the time of peak demand (on July 24th) and over the preceding seven days (July 17-23)  produced at 89.4 to 113.0 MW, averaging only 99.1 MW at the time of peak demand or just 4% of rated capacity.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5887">
		<![CDATA[ This working paper is made available by the Resource and Environmental economics and 
Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group at the University of Victoria. REPA working 
papers have not been peer reviewed and contain preliminary research findings. They shall 
not be cited without the expressed written consent of the author(s). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Editor's Note:&lt;/strong&gt; The authors&#226; conclusion regarding &#226;effective capacity&#226;, i.e. the measure of 
a generator&#226;s contribution to system reliability  that is tied to meeting peak loads,  is that it &#226;is difficult to generalize, as it is a highly site-specific quantity determined by the correlation between wind resource and load&#226; and that &#226;values range from 26 % to 0% of rated capacity.&#226;  This conclusion is based, in part, on a 2003 study by the California Energy Commission that estimated that three wind farm aggregates- Altamont, San Gorgonio and Tehachpi, which collectively represent 75% of California&#226;s deployed wind capacity- had relative capacity credits of 26.0%, 23.9% and 22.0% respectively.  It is noteworthy that during California&#226;s Summer &#226;06 energy crunch, as has been widely publicized in the press, wind power produced at 254.6 MW (10.2% of wind&#226;s rated capacity of 2,500MW) at the time of peak demand (on July 24th) and over the preceding seven days (July 17-23)  produced at 89.4 to 113.0 MW, averaging only 99.1 MW at the time of peak demand or just 4% of rated capacity.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Response: The myth of the Danish green energy ‘miracle'</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21163" title="Response: The myth of the Danish green energy &#226;miracle'"/> 
	<id>.21163</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-11T04:55:54Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-11T04:55:54Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">It is important to understand why the Danish government, which appears to have commissioned Mr. Pedersen's comments, is sensitive to critiques of the Danish experience with wind power. Denmark is home to Vestas, the world's largest wind turbine manufacturer, with 20,000 employees and a market share of between 20% and 25%. As the market for its turbines in Denmark and other European countries becomes saturated, it seeks to export the Danish experience worldwide. To this end, it recently ran a multi-million dollar global ad campaign with the slogan, &amp;quot;Believe in the wind,&amp;quot; claiming that Denmark has solved the problem of dirty electricity through wind power.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21163">
		<![CDATA[ It is important to understand why the Danish government, which appears to have commissioned Mr. Pedersen's comments, is sensitive to critiques of the Danish experience with wind power. Denmark is home to Vestas, the world's largest wind turbine manufacturer, with 20,000 employees and a market share of between 20% and 25%. As the market for its turbines in Denmark and other European countries becomes saturated, it seeks to export the Danish experience worldwide. To this end, it recently ran a multi-million dollar global ad campaign with the slogan, &amp;quot;Believe in the wind,&amp;quot; claiming that Denmark has solved the problem of dirty electricity through wind power. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
