	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c56+54?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c56+54?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Indigenous people see harm from Kyoto warming pact</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/6238" title="Indigenous people see harm from Kyoto warming pact"/> 
	<id>.6238</id> 
	<updated>2006-11-08T12:44:19Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-11-08T12:44:19Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Indigenous peoples from the Amazon to Asia said on Wednesday that U.N.-backed clean energy projects meant to combat global warming were aggravating threats to their livelihoods. 

They said hydropower projects or plantations of fast-growing trees, prompted by a billion-dollar scheme under the U.N.&#226;s Kyoto Protocol for limiting the planet&#226;s dependence on fossil fuels, were damaging nature. 

&#226;We are not only victims of climate change, we are now victims of the carbon market,&#226; Jocelyn Therese, a spokesman for indigenous peoples of the Amazon basin, told a news conference on the fringes of U.N. talks on global warming. 

&#226;Efforts that are supposed to&#226;&#166;retard climate change are having an equally disastrous effect,&#226; said Ana Pinto, representing indigenous peoples in India. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/6238">
		<![CDATA[ Indigenous peoples from the Amazon to Asia said on Wednesday that U.N.-backed clean energy projects meant to combat global warming were aggravating threats to their livelihoods. 

They said hydropower projects or plantations of fast-growing trees, prompted by a billion-dollar scheme under the U.N.&#226;s Kyoto Protocol for limiting the planet&#226;s dependence on fossil fuels, were damaging nature. 

&#226;We are not only victims of climate change, we are now victims of the carbon market,&#226; Jocelyn Therese, a spokesman for indigenous peoples of the Amazon basin, told a news conference on the fringes of U.N. talks on global warming. 

&#226;Efforts that are supposed to&#226;&#166;retard climate change are having an equally disastrous effect,&#226; said Ana Pinto, representing indigenous peoples in India. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Critics call World Bank energy scheme misguided</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5167" title="Critics call World Bank energy scheme misguided"/> 
	<id>.5167</id> 
	<updated>2006-09-17T22:12:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-09-17T22:12:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A World Bank scheme to bring electricity to the world's poor is short-sighted and won't curb climate change or help the people it's aimed at, environmental groups said on Sunday. 

The Bank released a progress report on Sunday looking at ways to fund cleaner energy projects in some of the world's poorest regions and drive economic growth in those areas. 

The report, entitled Investment Framework on Clean Energy and Development, says an estimated 1.6 billion people do not have access to electricity. 

Environmental groups said the Bank was missing a huge opportunity to promote the use of renewable energy by instead backing conventional fossil-fuel based generation. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5167">
		<![CDATA[ A World Bank scheme to bring electricity to the world's poor is short-sighted and won't curb climate change or help the people it's aimed at, environmental groups said on Sunday. 

The Bank released a progress report on Sunday looking at ways to fund cleaner energy projects in some of the world's poorest regions and drive economic growth in those areas. 

The report, entitled Investment Framework on Clean Energy and Development, says an estimated 1.6 billion people do not have access to electricity. 

Environmental groups said the Bank was missing a huge opportunity to promote the use of renewable energy by instead backing conventional fossil-fuel based generation. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>If we want to help the Third World, let's promote nuclear power</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5033" title="If we want to help the Third World, let's promote nuclear power"/> 
	<id>.5033</id> 
	<updated>2006-09-13T12:09:56Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-09-13T12:09:56Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is thus a critical priority for developing nations. Hydroelectric projects offer one solution, coal-fired power plants another. They aren't perfect ecologically, but neither are wind turbines, which require extensive acreage, kill birds, and provide inadequate amounts of intermittent, expensive electricity that cannot possibly sustain modern societies. 



Now a revolutionary nuclear energy technology is being designed and built in South Africa, but with suppliers and partners in many other nations. The 165-megawatt Pebble Bed Modular Reactors are small and inexpensive enough to provide electrical power for emerging economies, individual cities or large industrial complexes. However, multiple units can be connected and operated from one control room, to meet the needs of large or growing communities. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/5033">
		<![CDATA[ Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is thus a critical priority for developing nations. Hydroelectric projects offer one solution, coal-fired power plants another. They aren't perfect ecologically, but neither are wind turbines, which require extensive acreage, kill birds, and provide inadequate amounts of intermittent, expensive electricity that cannot possibly sustain modern societies. 



Now a revolutionary nuclear energy technology is being designed and built in South Africa, but with suppliers and partners in many other nations. The 165-megawatt Pebble Bed Modular Reactors are small and inexpensive enough to provide electrical power for emerging economies, individual cities or large industrial complexes. However, multiple units can be connected and operated from one control room, to meet the needs of large or growing communities. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Nuclear to the rescue - Electricity is the key to a healthier, more prosperous Third World</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4722" title="Nuclear to the rescue - Electricity is the key to a healthier, more prosperous Third World"/> 
	<id>.4722</id> 
	<updated>2006-08-29T13:37:09Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-08-29T13:37:09Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is a critical priority for developing nations. Hydroelectric projects like Bujagali (Uganda), Narmada (India) and Three Gorges (China) offer one solution; coal-fired power plants another. They aren't perfect ecologically, but neither are wind turbines, which require extensive acreage, kill birds, and provide inadequate amounts of intermittent, expensive electricity that cannot possibly sustain modern societies. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/4722">
		<![CDATA[ Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is a critical priority for developing nations. Hydroelectric projects like Bujagali (Uganda), Narmada (India) and Three Gorges (China) offer one solution; coal-fired power plants another. They aren't perfect ecologically, but neither are wind turbines, which require extensive acreage, kill birds, and provide inadequate amounts of intermittent, expensive electricity that cannot possibly sustain modern societies. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
