	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c52+106?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c52+106?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Kaine seeks task force on offshore wind power</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23256" title="Kaine seeks task force on offshore wind power"/> 
	<id>.23256</id> 
	<updated>2009-09-22T00:45:01Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-09-22T00:45:01Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The governor made his first formal step in developing offshore wind resources, saying in a news release today that he has requested the formation of a federal-state-local task force. 
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine sent a letter this month to the U.S. Department of the Interior requesting the formation of the task force to guide and facilitate the leasing process of federal waters off the Virginia coast to develop wind power. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23256">
		<![CDATA[ The governor made his first formal step in developing offshore wind resources, saying in a news release today that he has requested the formation of a federal-state-local task force. 
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine sent a letter this month to the U.S. Department of the Interior requesting the formation of the task force to guide and facilitate the leasing process of federal waters off the Virginia coast to develop wind power. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Opposing winds</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22616" title="Opposing winds"/> 
	<id>.22616</id> 
	<updated>2009-08-10T14:52:18Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-08-10T14:52:18Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Virginia's national forests are emerging as a potential battleground for wind energy, a key part of efforts to develop alternatives to coal and oil in the United States.

Few proposals have been made so far for wind farms in the thousands of acres of Virginia national forest, but those that have been submitted have sparked intense disagreement. ...&amp;quot;The whole wind energy thing is brand new to the forest service. We don't really have any experience or guidance with this,&amp;quot; said James T. Smalls, district ranger for the Lee Ranger District of the George Washington &amp;amp; Jefferson national forests in Virginia.


</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22616">
		<![CDATA[ Virginia's national forests are emerging as a potential battleground for wind energy, a key part of efforts to develop alternatives to coal and oil in the United States.

Few proposals have been made so far for wind farms in the thousands of acres of Virginia national forest, but those that have been submitted have sparked intense disagreement. ...&amp;quot;The whole wind energy thing is brand new to the forest service. We don't really have any experience or guidance with this,&amp;quot; said James T. Smalls, district ranger for the Lee Ranger District of the George Washington &amp;amp; Jefferson national forests in Virginia.


 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Closer, but no cigar; Grueling wind plan review continues </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22313" title="Closer, but no cigar; Grueling wind plan review continues "/> 
	<id>.22313</id> 
	<updated>2009-07-23T03:54:22Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-07-23T03:54:22Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A third meeting of county officials reviewing HNWD's plans was held at a brisk pace this week. The Technical Review Committee of county administrator Roberta Lambert and building official Jim Whitelaw is sorting through a checklist of conditions Highland New Wind Development must meet before it can get a green light for construction.

Opponents of the 38-megawatt electric utility are pushing to hold the county, and HNWD, accountable for meeting their responsibilities, raising questions about erosion control, wetlands protection, proper maps, and other concerns. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22313">
		<![CDATA[ A third meeting of county officials reviewing HNWD's plans was held at a brisk pace this week. The Technical Review Committee of county administrator Roberta Lambert and building official Jim Whitelaw is sorting through a checklist of conditions Highland New Wind Development must meet before it can get a green light for construction.

Opponents of the 38-megawatt electric utility are pushing to hold the county, and HNWD, accountable for meeting their responsibilities, raising questions about erosion control, wetlands protection, proper maps, and other concerns. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Steering committee suggests changes to ridgeline ordinance</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20671" title="Steering committee suggests changes to ridgeline ordinance"/> 
	<id>.20671</id> 
	<updated>2009-04-08T15:45:55Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-04-08T15:45:55Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Tazewell County officials are moving closer to a decision on a controversial windmill farm project for East River Mountain.

A steering committee studying the wind turbine project has recommended several changes to a proposed ridgeline protection ordinance, David Anderson, chairman of the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors, said.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20671">
		<![CDATA[ Tazewell County officials are moving closer to a decision on a controversial windmill farm project for East River Mountain.

A steering committee studying the wind turbine project has recommended several changes to a proposed ridgeline protection ordinance, David Anderson, chairman of the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors, said.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Senate committee kills renewable energy bill</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20151" title="Senate committee kills renewable energy bill"/> 
	<id>.20151</id> 
	<updated>2009-02-24T18:49:57Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-02-24T18:49:57Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A Senate committee has killed a bill that aimed to set up a panel of scientific experts ...to identify and finance renewable energy research projects around Virginia.

The measure, HB 2404, was sponsored by Del. Rob Bell, R-Albemarle County, and was atop the House GOP's &amp;quot;energy independence and alternative resources&amp;quot; agenda for the 2009 General Assembly session. The bill aimed to clean up the environment, create green jobs and stimulate the state's economy.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20151">
		<![CDATA[ A Senate committee has killed a bill that aimed to set up a panel of scientific experts ...to identify and finance renewable energy research projects around Virginia.

The measure, HB 2404, was sponsored by Del. Rob Bell, R-Albemarle County, and was atop the House GOP's &amp;quot;energy independence and alternative resources&amp;quot; agenda for the 2009 General Assembly session. The bill aimed to clean up the environment, create green jobs and stimulate the state's economy.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Tax breaks for developers could cut county tax revenue; Highland supervisors oppose wind energy bill</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19724" title="Tax breaks for developers could cut county tax revenue; Highland supervisors oppose wind energy bill"/> 
	<id>.19724</id> 
	<updated>2009-01-29T14:30:42Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-01-29T14:30:42Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The $200,000-plus Highland County hoped to receive from the proposed wind utility here could be cut to $120,000 if a legislative proposal survives the General Assembly this session, according to county officials.
Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) submitted a bill that would allow wind energy facilities an exemption on state and local taxes up to 80 percent of the value of their projects if their capacity is less than 100 megawatts.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/19724">
		<![CDATA[ The $200,000-plus Highland County hoped to receive from the proposed wind utility here could be cut to $120,000 if a legislative proposal survives the General Assembly this session, according to county officials.
Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) submitted a bill that would allow wind energy facilities an exemption on state and local taxes up to 80 percent of the value of their projects if their capacity is less than 100 megawatts.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind energy ordinance drafted for Bath County</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18918" title="Wind energy ordinance drafted for Bath County"/> 
	<id>.18918</id> 
	<updated>2008-11-20T16:52:11Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-11-20T16:52:11Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Ryder began working on the ordinance in response to a request from the planning commission last month. The county is working with James Madison University on a field test of the Virginia Renewables Siting Scoring System, or VRS3. The test will use a scoring book to evaluate factors related to siting wind energy facilities in various parts of the county. However, work on the book is still not complete.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18918">
		<![CDATA[ Ryder began working on the ordinance in response to a request from the planning commission last month. The county is working with James Madison University on a field test of the Virginia Renewables Siting Scoring System, or VRS3. The test will use a scoring book to evaluate factors related to siting wind energy facilities in various parts of the county. However, work on the book is still not complete. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm off Va. coast can be done, researchers say</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17710" title="Wind farm off Va. coast can be done, researchers say"/> 
	<id>.17710</id> 
	<updated>2008-08-30T04:29:50Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-08-30T04:29:50Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A team of university scientists and industry experts has narrowed its sights on an initial project - about 100 wind turbines installed at least 12 miles off Virginia Beach, costing more than $250 million.

The whirling turbines, each about 300 feet tall, would not be visible from shore, researchers said, and would take advantage of strong, consistent winds found in that part of the Atlantic, especially during winter. ...&amp;quot;If wind energy development in the eastern U.S. is going to make a real rather than symbolic contribution to solving our energy and air pollution problems, it will certainly be offshore development,&amp;quot; Rick Webb, a University of Virginia scientist.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17710">
		<![CDATA[ A team of university scientists and industry experts has narrowed its sights on an initial project - about 100 wind turbines installed at least 12 miles off Virginia Beach, costing more than $250 million.

The whirling turbines, each about 300 feet tall, would not be visible from shore, researchers said, and would take advantage of strong, consistent winds found in that part of the Atlantic, especially during winter. ...&amp;quot;If wind energy development in the eastern U.S. is going to make a real rather than symbolic contribution to solving our energy and air pollution problems, it will certainly be offshore development,&amp;quot; Rick Webb, a University of Virginia scientist.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Pa. judges recommend against power line</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17576" title="Pa. judges recommend against power line"/> 
	<id>.17576</id> 
	<updated>2008-08-23T15:15:56Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-08-23T15:15:56Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Virginia may have given a controversial power line an initial &amp;quot;yes,&amp;quot; but Pennsylvania has given it an initial &amp;quot;no.&amp;quot; 

In a ruling released late Thursday, regulatory judges in Pennsylvania recommended that the state's Public Utilities Commission deny applications from Allegheny Power and Dominion Virginia power to build the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line. 

A hearing examiner for the Virginia State Corporation Commission has recommended approval for the controversial power line, but only on the condition that West Virginia and Pennsylvania also sign off on the plan. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17576">
		<![CDATA[ Virginia may have given a controversial power line an initial &amp;quot;yes,&amp;quot; but Pennsylvania has given it an initial &amp;quot;no.&amp;quot; 

In a ruling released late Thursday, regulatory judges in Pennsylvania recommended that the state's Public Utilities Commission deny applications from Allegheny Power and Dominion Virginia power to build the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line. 

A hearing examiner for the Virginia State Corporation Commission has recommended approval for the controversial power line, but only on the condition that West Virginia and Pennsylvania also sign off on the plan. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>â€˜Clean Energyâ€™ Bill Runs Out of Steam; Commerce and Labor Committee pulls plug on Petersen bill</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14274" title="&#226;€˜Clean Energy&#226;€™ Bill Runs Out of Steam; Commerce and Labor Committee pulls plug on Petersen bill"/> 
	<id>.14274</id> 
	<updated>2008-02-21T23:07:55Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-02-21T23:07:55Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Sen. Chap Petersen&#226;€™s (D-34) Clean Energy Future bill was wiped from the 2008 legislative agenda last week when the proposal calling for renewable energy sources and reductions in energy consumption was killed in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee on a 3-12 vote.

Senate Bill 446 would have required energy providers to produce 20 percent of their power through renewable resources by 2020. Petersen had touted the initiative heavily during his campaign for the Senate last year.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14274">
		<![CDATA[ Sen. Chap Petersen&#226;€™s (D-34) Clean Energy Future bill was wiped from the 2008 legislative agenda last week when the proposal calling for renewable energy sources and reductions in energy consumption was killed in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee on a 3-12 vote.

Senate Bill 446 would have required energy providers to produce 20 percent of their power through renewable resources by 2020. Petersen had touted the initiative heavily during his campaign for the Senate last year.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Highland wind farm bill blown out of the Senate</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14133" title="Highland wind farm bill blown out of the Senate"/> 
	<id>.14133</id> 
	<updated>2008-02-14T20:01:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-02-14T20:01:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A bill which would have eased environmental restrictions for a controversial wind farm slated for construction in Highland County has stalled in committee. As previously reported in the Hook, Senate Bill 324, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach), would have exempted all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/14133">
		<![CDATA[ A bill which would have eased environmental restrictions for a controversial wind farm slated for construction in Highland County has stalled in committee. As previously reported in the Hook, Senate Bill 324, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach), would have exempted all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Bill would strike a blow for Highland wind farm</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13713" title="Bill would strike a blow for Highland wind farm"/> 
	<id>.13713</id> 
	<updated>2008-01-21T01:04:09Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-01-21T01:04:09Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">State legislators may soon make life easier for a company looking to build a controversial wind farm in Highland County. A new bill in the General Assembly would exempt certain small electricity-generating facilities from state environmental regulations and requirements, so long as they operate on renewable energy.
Senate bill 234, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) two weeks ago and currently being considered by the Commerce and Labor Committee, would exempt all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts. ...Rick Webb, a senior scientist at UVA and nationally-recognized wind energy expert, believes that the passing of this bill is crucial to the Highland County wind farm's success and that without the bill's passage, Highland New Wind would face potentially devastating repercussions for failing to abide by the Endangered Species Act.

The proposed wind farm's location is in the center of several caves that are home to two species of endangered bats: the Virginia Big-Eared bat and the Indiana bat.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13713">
		<![CDATA[ State legislators may soon make life easier for a company looking to build a controversial wind farm in Highland County. A new bill in the General Assembly would exempt certain small electricity-generating facilities from state environmental regulations and requirements, so long as they operate on renewable energy.
Senate bill 234, introduced by State Senator Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) two weeks ago and currently being considered by the Commerce and Labor Committee, would exempt all electric facilities that generate and distribute renewable energy with a capacity of no more than 50 megawatts. ...Rick Webb, a senior scientist at UVA and nationally-recognized wind energy expert, believes that the passing of this bill is crucial to the Highland County wind farm's success and that without the bill's passage, Highland New Wind would face potentially devastating repercussions for failing to abide by the Endangered Species Act.

The proposed wind farm's location is in the center of several caves that are home to two species of endangered bats: the Virginia Big-Eared bat and the Indiana bat.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Dominion Power seeks ideas for green projects</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13220" title="Dominion Power seeks ideas for green projects"/> 
	<id>.13220</id> 
	<updated>2007-12-17T23:34:21Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-12-17T23:34:21Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Dominion Virginia Power, the state's largest electric utility, is looking to get greener.

Actually, Dominion must get greener, mostly because of government rules in Virginia and North Carolina that at least 12 percent of the company's energy come from renewable sources by 2022.

Dominion currently draws about 2 percent of its power from green energy supplies, including a large biomass facility in Pittsylvania County and a hydroelectric pumping station in the mountains of Bath County.

To expand its environmental portfolio, the Richmond-based conglomerate is seeking project proposals from entrepreneurs and businesses to provide more renewable energy in the near future. ...&amp;quot;In order to meet one of the fastest-growing demands in the country, we need a very balanced portfolio,&amp;quot; he said. That means investing in coal as well as renewables, energy conservation and efficiencies, and nuclear power.

Dominion announced last month that it intends to seek a federal license to build a third reactor at its North Anna nuclear power plant, northwest of Richmond.


</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13220">
		<![CDATA[ Dominion Virginia Power, the state's largest electric utility, is looking to get greener.

Actually, Dominion must get greener, mostly because of government rules in Virginia and North Carolina that at least 12 percent of the company's energy come from renewable sources by 2022.

Dominion currently draws about 2 percent of its power from green energy supplies, including a large biomass facility in Pittsylvania County and a hydroelectric pumping station in the mountains of Bath County.

To expand its environmental portfolio, the Richmond-based conglomerate is seeking project proposals from entrepreneurs and businesses to provide more renewable energy in the near future. ...&amp;quot;In order to meet one of the fastest-growing demands in the country, we need a very balanced portfolio,&amp;quot; he said. That means investing in coal as well as renewables, energy conservation and efficiencies, and nuclear power.

Dominion announced last month that it intends to seek a federal license to build a third reactor at its North Anna nuclear power plant, northwest of Richmond.


 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>House rejects amendment to stop power lines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10293" title="House rejects amendment to stop power lines"/> 
	<id>.10293</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-21T11:34:23Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-21T11:34:23Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">WASHINGTON - The House rejected a resolution Wednesday that would block government plans to spur construction of major new power lines in many states regardless of local opposition.

The issue has been contentious in parts of the East Coast and in the Southwest, where two high priority transmission corridors for power lines were proposed. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., warned colleagues that unwanted power lines could come to their district. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10293">
		<![CDATA[ WASHINGTON - The House rejected a resolution Wednesday that would block government plans to spur construction of major new power lines in many states regardless of local opposition.

The issue has been contentious in parts of the East Coast and in the Southwest, where two high priority transmission corridors for power lines were proposed. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., warned colleagues that unwanted power lines could come to their district.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>U.Va. Environmental Scientist Advocates Impact Assessments for Wind Energy Projects</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10014" title="U.Va. Environmental Scientist Advocates Impact Assessments for Wind Energy Projects"/> 
	<id>.10014</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-05T10:51:01Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-05T10:51:01Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Imagine 3,500 wind turbines, each at least as tall as a 40-story building, lining the ridges of Virginia's mountains for about 400 miles (Shenandoah National Park is 100 miles in length). That is what would be needed, according to a U.Va. environmental scientist, to satisfy proposed legislation to make nine percent of Virginia's energy &amp;quot;renewable&amp;quot; by 2020.

Rick Webb doesn't want to imagine it, nor would he allow it if it were up to him. &amp;quot;On-shore wind energy will do little to solve our energy problems in Virginia, but will possibly do significant harm to our environment,&amp;quot; he said. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10014">
		<![CDATA[ Imagine 3,500 wind turbines, each at least as tall as a 40-story building, lining the ridges of Virginia's mountains for about 400 miles (Shenandoah National Park is 100 miles in length). That is what would be needed, according to a U.Va. environmental scientist, to satisfy proposed legislation to make nine percent of Virginia's energy &amp;quot;renewable&amp;quot; by 2020.

Rick Webb doesn't want to imagine it, nor would he allow it if it were up to him. &amp;quot;On-shore wind energy will do little to solve our energy problems in Virginia, but will possibly do significant harm to our environment,&amp;quot; he said.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind Chill?</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9727" title="Wind Chill?"/> 
	<id>.9727</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-23T12:33:12Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-23T12:33:12Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Webb's take: while wind energy may be a partial solution to what he sees as an energy crisis, the electricity produced by turbines built atop pristine Appalachian ridges won't make enough of a meaningful contribution to offset their environmental harm.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9727">
		<![CDATA[ Webb's take: while wind energy may be a partial solution to what he sees as an energy crisis, the electricity produced by turbines built atop pristine Appalachian ridges won't make enough of a meaningful contribution to offset their environmental harm. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Scientist says Virginia, SCC should consider wind energy report</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9484" title="Scientist says Virginia, SCC should consider wind energy report"/> 
	<id>.9484</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-10T11:52:35Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-10T11:52:35Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Webb, a senior research scientist at the University of Virginia's department of environmental sciences, spent 20 months serving on the committee studying the environmental effects of industrial-scale wind energy in the United States and Mid-Atlantic Highlands - a study mandated by the U.S. Congress after a request from Sen. Mollihan in West Virginia.

The committee's recently released report has been submitted to Congress, and Webb says it concludes, as he has said for so long, that decisions about wind projects need to be tied to a systematic review process with specific requirements for information. &amp;quot;The NRC report calls for clear criteria or guidelines for making decisions,&amp;quot; Webb said. &amp;quot;We don't have that at this point.&amp;quot; </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9484">
		<![CDATA[ Webb, a senior research scientist at the University of Virginia's department of environmental sciences, spent 20 months serving on the committee studying the environmental effects of industrial-scale wind energy in the United States and Mid-Atlantic Highlands - a study mandated by the U.S. Congress after a request from Sen. Mollihan in West Virginia.

The committee's recently released report has been submitted to Congress, and Webb says it concludes, as he has said for so long, that decisions about wind projects need to be tied to a systematic review process with specific requirements for information. &amp;quot;The NRC report calls for clear criteria or guidelines for making decisions,&amp;quot; Webb said. &amp;quot;We don't have that at this point.&amp;quot;  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Lawmakers fight electric line expansions in NY, PA, and VA</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9342" title="Lawmakers fight electric line expansions in NY, PA, and VA"/> 
	<id>.9342</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-04T11:44:09Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-04T11:44:09Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">From New York to Virginia, residents face the prospect of new high-voltage line construction after an announcement last week by the Department of Energy.

Now, East Coast lawmakers are banding together in a bid to short-circuit the federal decision making it easier for power companies to build major power lines like the New York Regional Interconnect. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9342">
		<![CDATA[ From New York to Virginia, residents face the prospect of new high-voltage line construction after an announcement last week by the Department of Energy.

Now, East Coast lawmakers are banding together in a bid to short-circuit the federal decision making it easier for power companies to build major power lines like the New York Regional Interconnect.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Federal proposal to expand transmission corridor would override landownersâ€™ desires</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9228" title="Federal proposal to expand transmission corridor would override landowners&#226;€™ desires"/> 
	<id>.9228</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-29T11:43:22Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-29T11:43:22Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A new federal proposal to help electricity flow more freely could help the energy-choked East Coast. But it could also infuriate landowners, who have traditionally gotten their way in fights against utilities in Delaware.

U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman last week named Delaware as part of his proposed eastern National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor. It would run from New York to Virginia, and west to Ohio. A second corridor would run through California, Arizona and Nevada. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9228">
		<![CDATA[ A new federal proposal to help electricity flow more freely could help the energy-choked East Coast. But it could also infuriate landowners, who have traditionally gotten their way in fights against utilities in Delaware.

U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman last week named Delaware as part of his proposed eastern National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor. It would run from New York to Virginia, and west to Ohio. A second corridor would run through California, Arizona and Nevada.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Ridge-top wind generates debate</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8655" title="Ridge-top wind generates debate"/> 
	<id>.8655</id> 
	<updated>2007-03-28T22:29:22Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-03-28T22:29:22Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">States with renewable portfolio standards have generated growth in the renewable energy sector, but many of the Appalachian states don't have one. Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and New York all have some fairly progressive goals, but West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee don't have a state RPS and wind projects often ignite battles.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8655">
		<![CDATA[ States with renewable portfolio standards have generated growth in the renewable energy sector, but many of the Appalachian states don't have one. Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and New York all have some fairly progressive goals, but West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee don't have a state RPS and wind projects often ignite battles. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
