    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c47+67?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Windmills hold no windfall for El Paso County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21468</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A plan to erect an array of windmills in eastern El Paso County won't be blowing a yearly windfall the county's way.
That's because wind energy facilities are considered business personal property, and the county ditched its personal property tax about a decade ago.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A plan to erect an array of windmills in eastern El Paso County won't be blowing a yearly windfall the county's way.
That's because wind energy facilities are considered business personal property, and the county ditched its personal property tax about a decade ago.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21468</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Xcel plan oversold in 2000; Investigation says wind overbilling went on for years.</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19310</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Xcel Energy oversold wind energy credits as far back as 2000 for a program in which customers voluntarily pay a premium for wind-generated power, according to an investigation by Colorado Public Utilities Commission staff. 

A settlement is looming related to Xcel's excess collections for the Windsource program from 2005 to 2007, which was disclosed earlier this week. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Xcel Energy oversold wind energy credits as far back as 2000 for a program in which customers voluntarily pay a premium for wind-generated power, according to an investigation by Colorado Public Utilities Commission staff. 

A settlement is looming related to Xcel's excess collections for the Windsource program from 2005 to 2007, which was disclosed earlier this week. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19310</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Xcel overbilled for wind plan; Company balks at PUC suggestion to refund more than $1.5 million to program's funders</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19272</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Xcel Energy overcollected more than $1.5 million from customers who voluntarily pay a premium for wind- generated electricity, according to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission staff. 

From 2005 to 2007, the state's largest utility sold credits for more green power than it generated at the wind farms in its Windsource program. 

Xcel knew it would have a production shortfall in the program but &quot;failed to act&quot;. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Xcel Energy overcollected more than $1.5 million from customers who voluntarily pay a premium for wind- generated electricity, according to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission staff. 

From 2005 to 2007, the state's largest utility sold credits for more green power than it generated at the wind farms in its Windsource program. 

Xcel knew it would have a production shortfall in the program but &quot;failed to act&quot;. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19272</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Are PRPA funds really going to renewable energy?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15094</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Green-e, the company hired by PRPA to track renewable energy credits, said it can't guarantee PRPA funds are actually going to targeted renewable projects.

Renewable Energy Credits are essentially tradable certificates of proof that one kWh of electricity has been generated by a renewable source. 

Green-e, owned by the Center for Resource Solutions, audits the sale of renewable energy credits, ensuring that the value green electricity has on the environment is only purchased once through the sale of credits.

But the company cannot verify money going to the owners of renewable energy projects such as Shell is actually being invested in the energy project and not going into the general fund.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Green-e, the company hired by PRPA to track renewable energy credits, said it can't guarantee PRPA funds are actually going to targeted renewable projects.

Renewable Energy Credits are essentially tradable certificates of proof that one kWh of electricity has been generated by a renewable source. 

Green-e, owned by the Center for Resource Solutions, audits the sale of renewable energy credits, ensuring that the value green electricity has on the environment is only purchased once through the sale of credits.

But the company cannot verify money going to the owners of renewable energy projects such as Shell is actually being invested in the energy project and not going into the general fund.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15094</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Springs' energy future relies increasingly on wind</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14939</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The state requires municipally owned Springs Utilities to derive 1 percent from renewables annually from 2008 to 2010, 3 percent from 2011 to 2014, 6 percent from 2015 to 2019 and 10 percent by 2020. 

More daunting is the possibility that federal lawmakers will impose carbon taxes to drive down reliance on coal. No one knows how much that would cost, but Springs Utilities could pay $150 million a year - about 16 percent of its current budget. That's a big incentive to find alternatives, and wind is one of those. ...The city's most recent poll showed 76 percent of residential customers surveyed are willing to pay $1 to $2 more a month to support wind. That's the estimated financial impact of using 50 megawatts of wind, which translates to 3.3 percent of the city's energy needs per year. 

The reason it doesn't account for more is that wind is an intermittent resource, and power is available from it only 35 percent of the time, Knopp said. 

Utilities' customer poll also showed 71 percent of the city's business customers support wind if it causes bills to increase by 1 percent or less. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The state requires municipally owned Springs Utilities to derive 1 percent from renewables annually from 2008 to 2010, 3 percent from 2011 to 2014, 6 percent from 2015 to 2019 and 10 percent by 2020. 

More daunting is the possibility that federal lawmakers will impose carbon taxes to drive down reliance on coal. No one knows how much that would cost, but Springs Utilities could pay $150 million a year - about 16 percent of its current budget. That's a big incentive to find alternatives, and wind is one of those. ...The city's most recent poll showed 76 percent of residential customers surveyed are willing to pay $1 to $2 more a month to support wind. That's the estimated financial impact of using 50 megawatts of wind, which translates to 3.3 percent of the city's energy needs per year. 

The reason it doesn't account for more is that wind is an intermittent resource, and power is available from it only 35 percent of the time, Knopp said. 

Utilities' customer poll also showed 71 percent of the city's business customers support wind if it causes bills to increase by 1 percent or less. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14939</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Salazar wins major victories on renewable energy incentives</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/10686</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As the Senate continues consideration of H.R.6, the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007, the Senate Finance Committee approved June 19 a broad package of energy tax incentives, several of which were driven by Senator Salazar. The Finance Committee energy tax package helps further America's progress towards energy independence and includes two Salazar-authored renewable energy incentives which will benefit farmers, ranchers, small businesses and homeowners. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As the Senate continues consideration of H.R.6, the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Protection, and Energy Efficiency Act of 2007, the Senate Finance Committee approved June 19 a broad package of energy tax incentives, several of which were driven by Senator Salazar. The Finance Committee energy tax package helps further America's progress towards energy independence and includes two Salazar-authored renewable energy incentives which will benefit farmers, ranchers, small businesses and homeowners.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/10686</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Renewable energy nears law status</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9735</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Four months after saying his &quot;New Energy Economy&quot; was more than a campaign promise, Gov. Bill Ritter will sign a half-dozen measures this week encouraging Coloradans to make more renewable energy and consume less fuel overall.

On Tuesday, Ritter signed a bill that rewards utilities for promoting energy conservation. It was vetoed twice by his predecessor, GOP Gov. Bill Owens.

Today, Ritter plans to sign measures to promote recycling and biofuels development, encourage construction of transmission lines from solar and wind farms and provide tax credits for renewable energy.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Four months after saying his &quot;New Energy Economy&quot; was more than a campaign promise, Gov. Bill Ritter will sign a half-dozen measures this week encouraging Coloradans to make more renewable energy and consume less fuel overall.

On Tuesday, Ritter signed a bill that rewards utilities for promoting energy conservation. It was vetoed twice by his predecessor, GOP Gov. Bill Owens.

Today, Ritter plans to sign measures to promote recycling and biofuels development, encourage construction of transmission lines from solar and wind farms and provide tax credits for renewable energy. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9735</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Windfall or just wind</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9663</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 11:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ LOGAN COUNTY - This county will have more tax revenue - about $2.3 million each year - after the Peetz Table Wind Energy Center is completed and placed on the tax rolls. The assessed valuation of the $700 million project will increase revenues for Logan County and also for the Peetz Plateau School District.

To put it in perspective, the $2.3 million the county will receive equals an 8.8 percent addition to its current annual budget of $26 million. Over the next 30 years, this will total about $70 million.

In addition, FPL is paying Logan County a one-time payment of $4.16 million in lieu of building permit fees and use taxes.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>LOGAN COUNTY - This county will have more tax revenue - about $2.3 million each year - after the Peetz Table Wind Energy Center is completed and placed on the tax rolls. The assessed valuation of the $700 million project will increase revenues for Logan County and also for the Peetz Plateau School District.

To put it in perspective, the $2.3 million the county will receive equals an 8.8 percent addition to its current annual budget of $26 million. Over the next 30 years, this will total about $70 million.

In addition, FPL is paying Logan County a one-time payment of $4.16 million in lieu of building permit fees and use taxes. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9663</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind power brings out pride, critics</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9030</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ VAIL - Buying wind credits gives peace of mind to us environmental sinners in the High Country, but are they worth much else?

There's been some serious back-patting going on ever since Vail Resorts and the area towns like Frisco and Vail decided to offset 100 percent of their electricity use with clean, emission-free power produced by wind farmers. It's the first thing you see on the Vail Resorts website and has made some towns leaders in this rapidly growing trend of &quot;neutralizing&quot; environmental impacts by investing in renewable energy.

Some people, though, question the world-saving value of purchasing wind offsets, fearing they're being used in lieu of actually decreasing energy use or fearing the offsets themselves are shady buys. They are certainly in vogue in the Fortune 500 world, but how much do they help the environment beyond clearing your conscience?  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>VAIL - Buying wind credits gives peace of mind to us environmental sinners in the High Country, but are they worth much else?

There's been some serious back-patting going on ever since Vail Resorts and the area towns like Frisco and Vail decided to offset 100 percent of their electricity use with clean, emission-free power produced by wind farmers. It's the first thing you see on the Vail Resorts website and has made some towns leaders in this rapidly growing trend of &quot;neutralizing&quot; environmental impacts by investing in renewable energy.

Some people, though, question the world-saving value of purchasing wind offsets, fearing they're being used in lieu of actually decreasing energy use or fearing the offsets themselves are shady buys. They are certainly in vogue in the Fortune 500 world, but how much do they help the environment beyond clearing your conscience? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9030</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Whole Foods selling credits for electricity</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6088</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Want wind power? 

Just walk to the nearest Whole Foods and buy a Wind Power card. 

Whole Foods, one of the nation’s largest wind power purchasers, will sell wind power cards beginning today. 

The cards, priced at $5 and $15, will be issued by Renewable Choice Energy, the same Boulder company that sells wind power to Whole Foods. 

“This represents a brand new step in allowing a point of entry for any residential customer around the country to start getting used to renewable energy,” said Renewable Choice CEO Quayle Hodek. 

For $15, a customer can buy a wind power card worth 750 kilowatt hours - enough to power an average home for a month. For $5, a customer can buy a card for 250 kilowatt hours. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Want wind power? 

Just walk to the nearest Whole Foods and buy a Wind Power card. 

Whole Foods, one of the nation’s largest wind power purchasers, will sell wind power cards beginning today. 

The cards, priced at $5 and $15, will be issued by Renewable Choice Energy, the same Boulder company that sells wind power to Whole Foods. 

“This represents a brand new step in allowing a point of entry for any residential customer around the country to start getting used to renewable energy,” said Renewable Choice CEO Quayle Hodek. 

For $15, a customer can buy a wind power card worth 750 kilowatt hours - enough to power an average home for a month. For $5, a customer can buy a card for 250 kilowatt hours. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6088</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind-power prices may be spread to all</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5547</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Colorado utility regulators are proposing to abolish Xcel Energy’s popular Windsource voluntary wind-energy program and instead have all ratepayers cover the slightly higher costs of the program. 

The staff of the Public Utilities Commission said in a filing that it no longer makes sense to charge a premium price for “green” power. 

The staff proposal says that spreading the Windsource costs among all ratepayers would create a “negligible” increase in rates, a small fraction of 1 percent. 

Customers who buy all their power from Windsource now pay an average of $58.55 a month, not including taxes and franchise fees. Typical customers using conventional power pay $52.58 a month. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Colorado utility regulators are proposing to abolish Xcel Energy’s popular Windsource voluntary wind-energy program and instead have all ratepayers cover the slightly higher costs of the program. 

The staff of the Public Utilities Commission said in a filing that it no longer makes sense to charge a premium price for “green” power. 

The staff proposal says that spreading the Windsource costs among all ratepayers would create a “negligible” increase in rates, a small fraction of 1 percent. 

Customers who buy all their power from Windsource now pay an average of $58.55 a month, not including taxes and franchise fees. Typical customers using conventional power pay $52.58 a month. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5547</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Credits help Utilities go green</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5293</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind farms in Kansas, Nebraska and California will play a role in Colorado Springs Utilities’ compliance with a voter-approved mandate on renewable energy. 

But homes and businesses in Colorado Springs won’t be getting electricity produced by harnessing wind in those places. Instead, renewable energy credits will be logged into Colorado Springs Utilities’ books. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind farms in Kansas, Nebraska and California will play a role in Colorado Springs Utilities’ compliance with a voter-approved mandate on renewable energy. 

But homes and businesses in Colorado Springs won’t be getting electricity produced by harnessing wind in those places. Instead, renewable energy credits will be logged into Colorado Springs Utilities’ books. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5293</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Xcel unveils renewable energy plan in Colorado</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4839</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 11:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ DENVER (AP) - Xcel Energy has announced plans for two more wind farms in Colorado to help it comply with a voter-approved initiative requiring it to obtain ten percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2015. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>DENVER (AP) - Xcel Energy has announced plans for two more wind farms in Colorado to help it comply with a voter-approved initiative requiring it to obtain ten percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2015. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4839</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind energy credits whistle up profits</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4239</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Quayle Hodek is sitting on a gold mine of green power.

He is the keeper of valuable &quot;wind energy credits&quot; for customers who want the electricity powering their homes and businesses to come from wind farms sprinkled across the nation.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Quayle Hodek is sitting on a gold mine of green power.

He is the keeper of valuable &quot;wind energy credits&quot; for customers who want the electricity powering their homes and businesses to come from wind farms sprinkled across the nation. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4239</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Hard to know Vail's current rate</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4236</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind-minded companies such as the resort negotiate their own deals, getting discounts along the way. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind-minded companies such as the resort negotiate their own deals, getting discounts along the way.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4236</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vail looks to wind for power of resorts</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4228</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Vail Resorts will not install wind turbines atop its slopes or use direct wind energy to power its chair lifts. Instead, it will purchase from Boulder-based Renewable Choice Energy renewable-energy credits equal to the amount of electricity it uses. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Vail Resorts will not install wind turbines atop its slopes or use direct wind energy to power its chair lifts. Instead, it will purchase from Boulder-based Renewable Choice Energy renewable-energy credits equal to the amount of electricity it uses. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4228</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Rate hike could end incentives for wind energy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/3150</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The increase is necessary because the Windsource program was designed for customers who want to pay premium rates in order to promote green energy, Stutz said.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The increase is necessary because the Windsource program was designed for customers who want to pay premium rates in order to promote green energy, Stutz said.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/3150</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ethanol bill passes, but modified</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2929</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The governor also notified lawmakers Monday he was letting a bill aimed at boosting wind-energy production in Colorado become law without his signature. 

House Bill 1275, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Greg Brophy, R-Wray, changes the method of taxing wind farms from a business tax based on the value of equipment that depreciates over time to a production tax that levelizes the revenue stream to counties over a 20-year period.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The governor also notified lawmakers Monday he was letting a bill aimed at boosting wind-energy production in Colorado become law without his signature. 

House Bill 1275, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Greg Brophy, R-Wray, changes the method of taxing wind farms from a business tax based on the value of equipment that depreciates over time to a production tax that levelizes the revenue stream to counties over a 20-year period. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2929</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm tax bill heads to governor's desk</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2548</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:02:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ DENVER - A bill changing the method of taxing wind turbines in an attempt to lure more windfarm companies to northeastern Colorado is expected to reach the governor's desk in the next few days. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>DENVER - A bill changing the method of taxing wind turbines in an attempt to lure more windfarm companies to northeastern Colorado is expected to reach the governor's desk in the next few days.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2548</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Assessor Wyatt counters claim regarding proposed House Bill amendment</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2388</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Prowers County Assessor, Andy Wyatt, got an unpleasant surprise on Thursday, March 30, when he read the Pueblo Chieftain story headlined, &quot;Lawmaker challenges wind farm legislation.&quot; According to the story, an amendment tacked onto House Bill 1275, &quot;at the behest of Prowers County Assessor Andy Wyatt&quot; would potentially make the bill unconstitutional.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Prowers County Assessor, Andy Wyatt, got an unpleasant surprise on Thursday, March 30, when he read the Pueblo Chieftain story headlined, &quot;Lawmaker challenges wind farm legislation.&quot; According to the story, an amendment tacked onto House Bill 1275, &quot;at the behest of Prowers County Assessor Andy Wyatt&quot; would potentially make the bill unconstitutional.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2388</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
