    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c45+95?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Turbine near home</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20663</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A wind turbine is seen from Hal Graham’s window on Lent Hill in Cohocton. Mr. Graham signed a lease agreement with First Wind (formerly UPC Wind) to permit turbines on his property. Since signing, Mr. Graham has been vocal in arguing First Wind was not forthcoming with how noisy the turbines would be. According to aerial photographs of Mr. Graham's property, two industrial-scale turbines are located at 1050 feet and 2000 feet of the wall of his home. In total there 
are six industrial scale turbines within one-mile of his house. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A wind turbine is seen from Hal Graham’s window on Lent Hill in Cohocton. Mr. Graham signed a lease agreement with First Wind (formerly UPC Wind) to permit turbines on his property. Since signing, Mr. Graham has been vocal in arguing First Wind was not forthcoming with how noisy the turbines would be. According to aerial photographs of Mr. Graham's property, two industrial-scale turbines are located at 1050 feet and 2000 feet of the wall of his home. In total there 
are six industrial scale turbines within one-mile of his house.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20663</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbines at NY's Maple Ridge facility</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19372</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An actual photograph of wind turbines erected in Lowville, NY at the Maple Ridge wind energy facility. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An actual photograph of wind turbines erected in Lowville, NY at the Maple Ridge wind energy facility.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19372</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ellenburg, New York</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15404</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Utility-scale turbines tower over the landscape in rural Ellenburg, NY  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Utility-scale turbines tower over the landscape in rural Ellenburg, NY </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15404</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>House surrounded by power lines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13834</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ House in Ellenburg, NY is surrounded by power lines that service the adjacent wind turbines.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>House in Ellenburg, NY is surrounded by power lines that service the adjacent wind turbines. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13834</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Tug Hill farm house with turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14961</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14961</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Fenner Wind Farm, NY</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/684</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/684</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Tug Hill (NY)- a.k.a. Maple Ridge: Turbines and House (2)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/482</link>
<pubDate> GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Calvin Luther Martin, Malone, NY 11/4/05</p>

<p>It’s Friday evening and I just got off the phone with a middle-aged lady who lives on the Tug Hill Plateau near Watertown, New York (USA).  What makes this banal fact remarkable is that the woman now finds herself living in a mind-blowing forest of 40-story-high industrial wind turbines. </p> 
	<p>The developers (Is this the right word to use for these people?) have given it the charming name, Maple Ridge Windfarm.  Everyone else in Upstate New York knows it as the Tug Hill Plateau:  a high tableland famous for its views of the Adirondacks (to the south), Canada (to the north), and L. Ontario (to the west).  Also a serious migratory bird flyway.  People remember Tug Hill as gorgeous and wild.</p>
	<p>No more.  Sarah (I have changed her name to protect her privacy) was eager to talk.  I found her full of homespun wisdom and quick to chuckle, even though she was in obvious pain.  This place, which has been home and memories, has become a nightmare.  When the turbine salesmen rang her doorbell a year ago to ask what she thought “about renewable energy” (that was their opening line), she soon steered the conversation around to the stupendous view.  Look there, she said, pointing to the mountains:  this is what I cherish. </p> 
	<p>No more.  She is now surrounded by colossal industrial wind turbines.  How many? I asked.  Fifteen to twenty within a mile radius, she replied.  I could hear her despair, her disbelief.  The wind companies (Zilkha and PPM) spent the summer feverishly cobbling together their Goliath machines:  187 in this first phase of the project.  There are more to come in Phase II.  And who knows how many more phases?  Besides the dozen plus overshadowing her, there is a power substation mere yards from her backdoor, in a ravine she remembers well as a child.  (The ravine was often struck by lightning, she recalled, as she wondered if this was the best spot for a power station.  Fond memories often bubbled to the surface as we talked—a surface now rendered incomprehensible.)  </p>
<p>Sarah took the company-sponsored bus trip to Fenner, NY, to inspect Fenner’s 20 turbines (“Go to Fenner and see for yourself”:  they got the same cheery line we get here, in Clinton &amp; Franklin counties).  She thought the Fenner turbines huge, but, it turns out, they are not as colossal as what she now has next door.  Besides, that was only 20; this is 187.  The number boggles her mind.  She met a lady in Fenner with a turbine or two on her property.  She motioned Sarah aside and whispered not to trust the wind energy company.  The woman and her husband are not getting what the company promised, and are suing as a result. </p> 
	<p>The wind salesmen snowed Sarah’s town board.  They promised the sun and the moon; the board swooned and said amen.  The wind guys managed to talk the town into a PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) rather than taxation, to Sarah’s disgust.  She was clearly dubious the salesmen would deliver what they promised.  And when it came to a public hearing, the town board hid the announcement so cunningly that Sarah was totally unaware of it.  </p>
	<p>The construction has shattered her life.  Noise.  Roads cratered and potholed and rutted.  Trees chain-sawed and bulldozed into piles.  Giant pits bored into the earth and filled with rebar-reinforced concrete.  Finally, the towers and 40-ton propellers and 60-ton nacelles stacked atop all this.  Literally, skyscrapers.  </p>
<p>The turbines are not yet running; they will be in another few months.  Sarah dreads that day:  the pulsed thump thump thump; the huge shadow from blades sweeping the landscape, everywhere you look (morning &amp; evening).  Sarah has sensitive hearing; she’s especially worried about the low frequency thump, night and day, weeks on end.  Already she struggles with 187 flashing red lights.  And she tries to compose herself over the floodlit power station next door.  When she telephoned the project manager to ask why those confounded lights need to be left on all night, he got testy and dismissed her.  </p>
<p>The floodlights still drill into her windows. </p> 
	<p>Welcome to Maple Ridge Windfarm.  A blasted, ruined, industrialized landscape where there was once serenity.  And beauty.  Sarah wandered down to the old family farm earlier this fall.  She stood on the road and gazed upon vandalism.  And wept. </p>   
<p>She’s angry.  She feels lied to.  She has a neighbor, a young man and his wife and little children, who is also outraged.  The man is building a lovely home; he moved here because of the magnificent views, the beauty.  Now, this.  He worries about his kids’ health once the generators fire up.  </p>
	<p>Sarah feels helpless, and kept saying she thinks she will move.  Driven from her home.  She worries no one will buy it, or will offer a fraction of its pre-turbine worth.  She foresees town revenues plummeting as people refuse to pay the tax on turbine-depreciated property. </p> 
	<p>In the end, she said, she and her neighbors were not organized well enough to stop the wind salesmen.  The property owners and town fathers fell in line perfectly, like sheep to be slaughtered.  Yet many of them don’t live on their land, or have moved elsewhere, leaving Sarah and her neighbors to deal with this horror.  </p>
<p>I urged her to start a daily journal of her experiences and the “progress” of the wind power project.  I also urged her to take photographs of her landscape and the windmills.  And I suggested she get an electrical engineer to check for ambient underground current, so she can sue the wind companies for stray current once the turbines go on line.  I suggested, too, that she and her neighbors get a complete physical and neurological exam before the turbines are fired up, again, to establish a medical baseline for future medical problems. </p> 
<p>I told her, finally, I had seen the amazing photograph of the Tug Hill turbines in the Watertown Daily Times last month.  “Yes,” she mused, “that was taken near my home.”  Then added, “It’s actually worse than the picture shows.” </p>    
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Calvin Luther Martin, Malone, NY 11/4/05

It’s Friday evening and I just got off the phone with a middle-aged lady who lives on the Tug Hill Plateau near Watertown, New York (USA).  What makes this banal fact remarkable is that the woman now finds herself living in a mind-blowing forest of 40-story-high industrial wind turbines.  
	The developers (Is this the right word to use for these people?) have given it the charming name, Maple Ridge Windfarm.  Everyone else in Upstate New York knows it as the Tug Hill Plateau:  a high tableland famous for its views of the Adirondacks (to the south), Canada (to the north), and L. Ontario (to the west).  Also a serious migratory bird flyway.  People remember Tug Hill as gorgeous and wild.
	No more.  Sarah (I have changed her name to protect her privacy) was eager to talk.  I found her full of homespun wisdom and quick to chuckle, even though she was in obvious pain.  This place, which has been home and memories, has become a nightmare.  When the turbine salesmen rang her doorbell a year ago to ask what she thought “about renewable energy” (that was their opening line), she soon steered the conversation around to the stupendous view.  Look there, she said, pointing to the mountains:  this is what I cherish.  
	No more.  She is now surrounded by colossal industrial wind turbines.  How many? I asked.  Fifteen to twenty within a mile radius, she replied.  I could hear her despair, her disbelief.  The wind companies (Zilkha and PPM) spent the summer feverishly cobbling together their Goliath machines:  187 in this first phase of the project.  There are more to come in Phase II.  And who knows how many more phases?  Besides the dozen plus overshadowing her, there is a power substation mere yards from her backdoor, in a ravine she remembers well as a child.  (The ravine was often struck by lightning, she recalled, as she wondered if this was the best spot for a power station.  Fond memories often bubbled to the surface as we talked—a surface now rendered incomprehensible.)  
Sarah took the company-sponsored bus trip to Fenner, NY, to inspect Fenner’s 20 turbines (“Go to Fenner and see for yourself”:  they got the same cheery line we get here, in Clinton &amp; Franklin counties).  She thought the Fenner turbines huge, but, it turns out, they are not as colossal as what she now has next door.  Besides, that was only 20; this is 187.  The number boggles her mind.  She met a lady in Fenner with a turbine or two on her property.  She motioned Sarah aside and whispered not to trust the wind energy company.  The woman and her husband are not getting what the company promised, and are suing as a result.  
	The wind salesmen snowed Sarah’s town board.  They promised the sun and the moon; the board swooned and said amen.  The wind guys managed to talk the town into a PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) rather than taxation, to Sarah’s disgust.  She was clearly dubious the salesmen would deliver what they promised.  And when it came to a public hearing, the town board hid the announcement so cunningly that Sarah was totally unaware of it.  
	The construction has shattered her life.  Noise.  Roads cratered and potholed and rutted.  Trees chain-sawed and bulldozed into piles.  Giant pits bored into the earth and filled with rebar-reinforced concrete.  Finally, the towers and 40-ton propellers and 60-ton nacelles stacked atop all this.  Literally, skyscrapers.  
The turbines are not yet running; they will be in another few months.  Sarah dreads that day:  the pulsed thump thump thump; the huge shadow from blades sweeping the landscape, everywhere you look (morning &amp; evening).  Sarah has sensitive hearing; she’s especially worried about the low frequency thump, night and day, weeks on end.  Already she struggles with 187 flashing red lights.  And she tries to compose herself over the floodlit power station next door.  When she telephoned the project manager to ask why those confounded lights need to be left on all night, he got testy and dismissed her.  
The floodlights still drill into her windows.  
	Welcome to Maple Ridge Windfarm.  A blasted, ruined, industrialized landscape where there was once serenity.  And beauty.  Sarah wandered down to the old family farm earlier this fall.  She stood on the road and gazed upon vandalism.  And wept.    
She’s angry.  She feels lied to.  She has a neighbor, a young man and his wife and little children, who is also outraged.  The man is building a lovely home; he moved here because of the magnificent views, the beauty.  Now, this.  He worries about his kids’ health once the generators fire up.  
	Sarah feels helpless, and kept saying she thinks she will move.  Driven from her home.  She worries no one will buy it, or will offer a fraction of its pre-turbine worth.  She foresees town revenues plummeting as people refuse to pay the tax on turbine-depreciated property.  
	In the end, she said, she and her neighbors were not organized well enough to stop the wind salesmen.  The property owners and town fathers fell in line perfectly, like sheep to be slaughtered.  Yet many of them don’t live on their land, or have moved elsewhere, leaving Sarah and her neighbors to deal with this horror.  
I urged her to start a daily journal of her experiences and the “progress” of the wind power project.  I also urged her to take photographs of her landscape and the windmills.  And I suggested she get an electrical engineer to check for ambient underground current, so she can sue the wind companies for stray current once the turbines go on line.  I suggested, too, that she and her neighbors get a complete physical and neurological exam before the turbines are fired up, again, to establish a medical baseline for future medical problems.  
I told her, finally, I had seen the amazing photograph of the Tug Hill turbines in the Watertown Daily Times last month.  “Yes,” she mused, “that was taken near my home.”  Then added, “It’s actually worse than the picture shows.”     
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/482</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Is going green destroying the lives of locals?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38208</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ You'll meet people from New York and Massachusetts, living just 120 miles apart, but claiming to have similar health issues they attribute to giant wind turbines in their backyards.

&quot;It sounds just like a prop jet outside the house,&quot; says Keith Dillenbeck, a dairy farmer in Herkimer County. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>You'll meet people from New York and Massachusetts, living just 120 miles apart, but claiming to have similar health issues they attribute to giant wind turbines in their backyards.

&quot;It sounds just like a prop jet outside the house,&quot; says Keith Dillenbeck, a dairy farmer in Herkimer County.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38208</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>To vote, or not to vote: Cape Vincent seasonal voters faced with a dilemma</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37813</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:50:14 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The registration change by the Fischers and hundreds of other seasonal residents helped re-elect Supervisor Urban C. Hirschey and replaced pro-wind councilmen, with ties to wind lease holders, with past members of an anti-wind turbine group.

But the Fischers paid a price. They lost up to $400 in STAR (School Tax Relief) rebates at their residence in Canandaigua. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The registration change by the Fischers and hundreds of other seasonal residents helped re-elect Supervisor Urban C. Hirschey and replaced pro-wind councilmen, with ties to wind lease holders, with past members of an anti-wind turbine group.

But the Fischers paid a price. They lost up to $400 in STAR (School Tax Relief) rebates at their residence in Canandaigua.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37813</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Orangeville Residents Threaten Lawsuits Over Wind Turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37715</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The law firm of Lippes &amp; Lippes has now sent a letter of notice to the company building the wind farm, Invenergy, and land owners who have signed leases for the project, that they could all be sued for damages, health effects, and loss of quality of life as a result of the Stony Creek project. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The law firm of Lippes &amp; Lippes has now sent a letter of notice to the company building the wind farm, Invenergy, and land owners who have signed leases for the project, that they could all be sued for damages, health effects, and loss of quality of life as a result of the Stony Creek project.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37715</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>NH wind-farm builder Iberdola facing lawsuit in N.Y. over wind noise</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36625</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ But in a 49-page complaint filed last month, the plaintiffs, who live within a mile or two of the wind farm in Fairfield, Middleville, and Norway, N.Y., are charging the Iberdrola companies with negligence, private nuisance, trespass and product liability violations for building the project without adequately considering the impact on residents. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>But in a 49-page complaint filed last month, the plaintiffs, who live within a mile or two of the wind farm in Fairfield, Middleville, and Norway, N.Y., are charging the Iberdrola companies with negligence, private nuisance, trespass and product liability violations for building the project without adequately considering the impact on residents.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36625</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>60 Herkimer Co. residents file lawsuit against wind farm owner</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36505</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Frustrated by the wind farm that some residents say drives them &quot;crazy,&quot; 60 Middleville, Fairfield and Norway residents have filed a lawsuit in state Supreme Court against the entities responsible for its construction, namely Iberdrola Renewables.
 
&quot;A lot of it has to do with the effect that it's having in being in close proximity to the residences,&quot; said Jeff DeFrancisco, an attorney from DeFrancisco &amp; Flagiatano Law Firm of Syracuse. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Frustrated by the wind farm that some residents say drives them &quot;crazy,&quot; 60 Middleville, Fairfield and Norway residents have filed a lawsuit in state Supreme Court against the entities responsible for its construction, namely Iberdrola Renewables.
 
&quot;A lot of it has to do with the effect that it's having in being in close proximity to the residences,&quot; said Jeff DeFrancisco, an attorney from DeFrancisco &amp; Flagiatano Law Firm of Syracuse.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36505</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm called giant pain in the neck</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36425</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dozens of neighbors of a $200 million wind farm sued the companies behind it, claiming noise and lights give them migraines, make them nervous and keep them up at night. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Dozens of neighbors of a $200 million wind farm sued the companies behind it, claiming noise and lights give them migraines, make them nervous and keep them up at night.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36425</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind energy forum brings hundreds</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36396</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Members of both town councils and planning boards spoke in unison, criticizing BP's &quot;back-door approach&quot; to the $300 million project and the developer's new 124-turbine layout that is in clear violation of local zoning laws. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Members of both town councils and planning boards spoke in unison, criticizing BP's &quot;back-door approach&quot; to the $300 million project and the developer's new 124-turbine layout that is in clear violation of local zoning laws.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36396</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Fairfield residents say wind turbines too noisy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35605</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:06:13 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Melewski said most of the spikes were in the 50-to-60 decibel range. Sixty decibels is equivalent to the sound of a dishwasher or clothes dryer.
 
During the second study, done over the course of 80 days, Melewski said samples were taken every 10 minutes, that added up to hours over that period. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Melewski said most of the spikes were in the 50-to-60 decibel range. Sixty decibels is equivalent to the sound of a dishwasher or clothes dryer.
 
During the second study, done over the course of 80 days, Melewski said samples were taken every 10 minutes, that added up to hours over that period.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35605</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Iberdrola's answer to wind turbine noise: Give residents noise generating machines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35583</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Weary residents asked town officials to measure noise levels at Iberdrola's Hardscrabble wind facility. The results found levels above the legal limit. But instead of reducing the noise, Iberdrola gave noise generating machines to residents in hopes of drowning out the whooshing and whirling turbine sounds. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Weary residents asked town officials to measure noise levels at Iberdrola's Hardscrabble wind facility. The results found levels above the legal limit. But instead of reducing the noise, Iberdrola gave noise generating machines to residents in hopes of drowning out the whooshing and whirling turbine sounds.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35583</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Fairfield residents given noise generators to drown out sound of windmills</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35504</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:50:13 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Tobin says people don't realize what it's like to try to try and sleep at night with these windmills going around and around when everything else is quiet. Tobin said, &quot;I've had a few friends of mine that came up ...they said 'well that aint nothin'. When they sat there and were were talking, they said 'my gosh, how the heck do you put up with this'. Yea, cause it's constant. It don't go away. It sounds like a plane that never stops. It just goes and goes and goes.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Tobin says people don't realize what it's like to try to try and sleep at night with these windmills going around and around when everything else is quiet. Tobin said, &quot;I've had a few friends of mine that came up ...they said 'well that aint nothin'. When they sat there and were were talking, they said 'my gosh, how the heck do you put up with this'. Yea, cause it's constant. It don't go away. It sounds like a plane that never stops. It just goes and goes and goes.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35504</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Noise reduction system to be installed at Hardscrabble Wind Farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35480</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The test results show repeated excursions beyond the legal limit. Simultaneous with its release of the report on sound testing, Iberdrola Renewables announced it would immediately begin testing the use of a proprietary noise reduction system developed by Gamesa, the manufacturer of the turbines. ...The town councils in both Fairfield and Norway have directed Iberdrola Renewables to report back to them on the results of the test no later than their next meeting in the month of September. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The test results show repeated excursions beyond the legal limit. Simultaneous with its release of the report on sound testing, Iberdrola Renewables announced it would immediately begin testing the use of a proprietary noise reduction system developed by Gamesa, the manufacturer of the turbines. ...The town councils in both Fairfield and Norway have directed Iberdrola Renewables to report back to them on the results of the test no later than their next meeting in the month of September.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35480</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Tests conducted to reduce turbine noise; Herkimer County site uses quieting software on wind power units</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35479</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The turbines, at 476 feet, are the tallest in the state so far. The two towns also were the first in the state to require sound testing of turbines after construction, rather than relying solely on pre-construction models to predict sound levels. ...Tests at the Hardscabble farm done in the spring and winter of 2011 found noise levels from the turbines were spiking as high as 60 decibles, Melewski said.
  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The turbines, at 476 feet, are the tallest in the state so far. The two towns also were the first in the state to require sound testing of turbines after construction, rather than relying solely on pre-construction models to predict sound levels. ...Tests at the Hardscabble farm done in the spring and winter of 2011 found noise levels from the turbines were spiking as high as 60 decibles, Melewski said.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35479</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Banning turbines in Litchfield maintains town's 'well-being' </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/34628</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
If industrial wind turbines set up shop in her community, however, she said they'd be destroying a community that is &quot;so peaceful and relaxing.&quot;
 
In a 4-1 vote Thursday night the Litchfield Town Board passed a local law that will ban construction of industrial wind turbines.
  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
If industrial wind turbines set up shop in her community, however, she said they'd be destroying a community that is &quot;so peaceful and relaxing.&quot;
 
In a 4-1 vote Thursday night the Litchfield Town Board passed a local law that will ban construction of industrial wind turbines.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/34628</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
