    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c45+95?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Turbine near home</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20663</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A wind turbine is seen from Hal Graham’s window on Lent Hill in Cohocton. Mr. Graham signed a lease agreement with First Wind (formerly UPC Wind) to permit turbines on his property. Since signing, Mr. Graham has been vocal in arguing First Wind was not forthcoming with how noisy the turbines would be. According to aerial photographs of Mr. Graham's property, two industrial-scale turbines are located at 1050 feet and 2000 feet of the wall of his home. In total there 
are six industrial scale turbines within one-mile of his house. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A wind turbine is seen from Hal Graham’s window on Lent Hill in Cohocton. Mr. Graham signed a lease agreement with First Wind (formerly UPC Wind) to permit turbines on his property. Since signing, Mr. Graham has been vocal in arguing First Wind was not forthcoming with how noisy the turbines would be. According to aerial photographs of Mr. Graham's property, two industrial-scale turbines are located at 1050 feet and 2000 feet of the wall of his home. In total there 
are six industrial scale turbines within one-mile of his house.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20663</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbines at NY's Maple Ridge facility</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19372</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An actual photograph of wind turbines erected in Lowville, NY at the Maple Ridge wind energy facility. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An actual photograph of wind turbines erected in Lowville, NY at the Maple Ridge wind energy facility.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19372</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ellenburg, New York</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15404</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Utility-scale turbines tower over the landscape in rural Ellenburg, NY  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Utility-scale turbines tower over the landscape in rural Ellenburg, NY </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15404</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>House surrounded by power lines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13834</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ House in Ellenburg, NY is surrounded by power lines that service the adjacent wind turbines.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>House in Ellenburg, NY is surrounded by power lines that service the adjacent wind turbines. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13834</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Tug Hill farm house with turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14961</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14961</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Fenner Wind Farm, NY</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/684</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/684</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Tug Hill (NY)- a.k.a. Maple Ridge: Turbines and House (2)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/482</link>
<pubDate> GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Calvin Luther Martin, Malone, NY 11/4/05</p>

<p>It’s Friday evening and I just got off the phone with a middle-aged lady who lives on the Tug Hill Plateau near Watertown, New York (USA).  What makes this banal fact remarkable is that the woman now finds herself living in a mind-blowing forest of 40-story-high industrial wind turbines. </p> 
	<p>The developers (Is this the right word to use for these people?) have given it the charming name, Maple Ridge Windfarm.  Everyone else in Upstate New York knows it as the Tug Hill Plateau:  a high tableland famous for its views of the Adirondacks (to the south), Canada (to the north), and L. Ontario (to the west).  Also a serious migratory bird flyway.  People remember Tug Hill as gorgeous and wild.</p>
	<p>No more.  Sarah (I have changed her name to protect her privacy) was eager to talk.  I found her full of homespun wisdom and quick to chuckle, even though she was in obvious pain.  This place, which has been home and memories, has become a nightmare.  When the turbine salesmen rang her doorbell a year ago to ask what she thought “about renewable energy” (that was their opening line), she soon steered the conversation around to the stupendous view.  Look there, she said, pointing to the mountains:  this is what I cherish. </p> 
	<p>No more.  She is now surrounded by colossal industrial wind turbines.  How many? I asked.  Fifteen to twenty within a mile radius, she replied.  I could hear her despair, her disbelief.  The wind companies (Zilkha and PPM) spent the summer feverishly cobbling together their Goliath machines:  187 in this first phase of the project.  There are more to come in Phase II.  And who knows how many more phases?  Besides the dozen plus overshadowing her, there is a power substation mere yards from her backdoor, in a ravine she remembers well as a child.  (The ravine was often struck by lightning, she recalled, as she wondered if this was the best spot for a power station.  Fond memories often bubbled to the surface as we talked—a surface now rendered incomprehensible.)  </p>
<p>Sarah took the company-sponsored bus trip to Fenner, NY, to inspect Fenner’s 20 turbines (“Go to Fenner and see for yourself”:  they got the same cheery line we get here, in Clinton &amp; Franklin counties).  She thought the Fenner turbines huge, but, it turns out, they are not as colossal as what she now has next door.  Besides, that was only 20; this is 187.  The number boggles her mind.  She met a lady in Fenner with a turbine or two on her property.  She motioned Sarah aside and whispered not to trust the wind energy company.  The woman and her husband are not getting what the company promised, and are suing as a result. </p> 
	<p>The wind salesmen snowed Sarah’s town board.  They promised the sun and the moon; the board swooned and said amen.  The wind guys managed to talk the town into a PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) rather than taxation, to Sarah’s disgust.  She was clearly dubious the salesmen would deliver what they promised.  And when it came to a public hearing, the town board hid the announcement so cunningly that Sarah was totally unaware of it.  </p>
	<p>The construction has shattered her life.  Noise.  Roads cratered and potholed and rutted.  Trees chain-sawed and bulldozed into piles.  Giant pits bored into the earth and filled with rebar-reinforced concrete.  Finally, the towers and 40-ton propellers and 60-ton nacelles stacked atop all this.  Literally, skyscrapers.  </p>
<p>The turbines are not yet running; they will be in another few months.  Sarah dreads that day:  the pulsed thump thump thump; the huge shadow from blades sweeping the landscape, everywhere you look (morning &amp; evening).  Sarah has sensitive hearing; she’s especially worried about the low frequency thump, night and day, weeks on end.  Already she struggles with 187 flashing red lights.  And she tries to compose herself over the floodlit power station next door.  When she telephoned the project manager to ask why those confounded lights need to be left on all night, he got testy and dismissed her.  </p>
<p>The floodlights still drill into her windows. </p> 
	<p>Welcome to Maple Ridge Windfarm.  A blasted, ruined, industrialized landscape where there was once serenity.  And beauty.  Sarah wandered down to the old family farm earlier this fall.  She stood on the road and gazed upon vandalism.  And wept. </p>   
<p>She’s angry.  She feels lied to.  She has a neighbor, a young man and his wife and little children, who is also outraged.  The man is building a lovely home; he moved here because of the magnificent views, the beauty.  Now, this.  He worries about his kids’ health once the generators fire up.  </p>
	<p>Sarah feels helpless, and kept saying she thinks she will move.  Driven from her home.  She worries no one will buy it, or will offer a fraction of its pre-turbine worth.  She foresees town revenues plummeting as people refuse to pay the tax on turbine-depreciated property. </p> 
	<p>In the end, she said, she and her neighbors were not organized well enough to stop the wind salesmen.  The property owners and town fathers fell in line perfectly, like sheep to be slaughtered.  Yet many of them don’t live on their land, or have moved elsewhere, leaving Sarah and her neighbors to deal with this horror.  </p>
<p>I urged her to start a daily journal of her experiences and the “progress” of the wind power project.  I also urged her to take photographs of her landscape and the windmills.  And I suggested she get an electrical engineer to check for ambient underground current, so she can sue the wind companies for stray current once the turbines go on line.  I suggested, too, that she and her neighbors get a complete physical and neurological exam before the turbines are fired up, again, to establish a medical baseline for future medical problems. </p> 
<p>I told her, finally, I had seen the amazing photograph of the Tug Hill turbines in the Watertown Daily Times last month.  “Yes,” she mused, “that was taken near my home.”  Then added, “It’s actually worse than the picture shows.” </p>    
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Calvin Luther Martin, Malone, NY 11/4/05

It’s Friday evening and I just got off the phone with a middle-aged lady who lives on the Tug Hill Plateau near Watertown, New York (USA).  What makes this banal fact remarkable is that the woman now finds herself living in a mind-blowing forest of 40-story-high industrial wind turbines.  
	The developers (Is this the right word to use for these people?) have given it the charming name, Maple Ridge Windfarm.  Everyone else in Upstate New York knows it as the Tug Hill Plateau:  a high tableland famous for its views of the Adirondacks (to the south), Canada (to the north), and L. Ontario (to the west).  Also a serious migratory bird flyway.  People remember Tug Hill as gorgeous and wild.
	No more.  Sarah (I have changed her name to protect her privacy) was eager to talk.  I found her full of homespun wisdom and quick to chuckle, even though she was in obvious pain.  This place, which has been home and memories, has become a nightmare.  When the turbine salesmen rang her doorbell a year ago to ask what she thought “about renewable energy” (that was their opening line), she soon steered the conversation around to the stupendous view.  Look there, she said, pointing to the mountains:  this is what I cherish.  
	No more.  She is now surrounded by colossal industrial wind turbines.  How many? I asked.  Fifteen to twenty within a mile radius, she replied.  I could hear her despair, her disbelief.  The wind companies (Zilkha and PPM) spent the summer feverishly cobbling together their Goliath machines:  187 in this first phase of the project.  There are more to come in Phase II.  And who knows how many more phases?  Besides the dozen plus overshadowing her, there is a power substation mere yards from her backdoor, in a ravine she remembers well as a child.  (The ravine was often struck by lightning, she recalled, as she wondered if this was the best spot for a power station.  Fond memories often bubbled to the surface as we talked—a surface now rendered incomprehensible.)  
Sarah took the company-sponsored bus trip to Fenner, NY, to inspect Fenner’s 20 turbines (“Go to Fenner and see for yourself”:  they got the same cheery line we get here, in Clinton &amp; Franklin counties).  She thought the Fenner turbines huge, but, it turns out, they are not as colossal as what she now has next door.  Besides, that was only 20; this is 187.  The number boggles her mind.  She met a lady in Fenner with a turbine or two on her property.  She motioned Sarah aside and whispered not to trust the wind energy company.  The woman and her husband are not getting what the company promised, and are suing as a result.  
	The wind salesmen snowed Sarah’s town board.  They promised the sun and the moon; the board swooned and said amen.  The wind guys managed to talk the town into a PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) rather than taxation, to Sarah’s disgust.  She was clearly dubious the salesmen would deliver what they promised.  And when it came to a public hearing, the town board hid the announcement so cunningly that Sarah was totally unaware of it.  
	The construction has shattered her life.  Noise.  Roads cratered and potholed and rutted.  Trees chain-sawed and bulldozed into piles.  Giant pits bored into the earth and filled with rebar-reinforced concrete.  Finally, the towers and 40-ton propellers and 60-ton nacelles stacked atop all this.  Literally, skyscrapers.  
The turbines are not yet running; they will be in another few months.  Sarah dreads that day:  the pulsed thump thump thump; the huge shadow from blades sweeping the landscape, everywhere you look (morning &amp; evening).  Sarah has sensitive hearing; she’s especially worried about the low frequency thump, night and day, weeks on end.  Already she struggles with 187 flashing red lights.  And she tries to compose herself over the floodlit power station next door.  When she telephoned the project manager to ask why those confounded lights need to be left on all night, he got testy and dismissed her.  
The floodlights still drill into her windows.  
	Welcome to Maple Ridge Windfarm.  A blasted, ruined, industrialized landscape where there was once serenity.  And beauty.  Sarah wandered down to the old family farm earlier this fall.  She stood on the road and gazed upon vandalism.  And wept.    
She’s angry.  She feels lied to.  She has a neighbor, a young man and his wife and little children, who is also outraged.  The man is building a lovely home; he moved here because of the magnificent views, the beauty.  Now, this.  He worries about his kids’ health once the generators fire up.  
	Sarah feels helpless, and kept saying she thinks she will move.  Driven from her home.  She worries no one will buy it, or will offer a fraction of its pre-turbine worth.  She foresees town revenues plummeting as people refuse to pay the tax on turbine-depreciated property.  
	In the end, she said, she and her neighbors were not organized well enough to stop the wind salesmen.  The property owners and town fathers fell in line perfectly, like sheep to be slaughtered.  Yet many of them don’t live on their land, or have moved elsewhere, leaving Sarah and her neighbors to deal with this horror.  
I urged her to start a daily journal of her experiences and the “progress” of the wind power project.  I also urged her to take photographs of her landscape and the windmills.  And I suggested she get an electrical engineer to check for ambient underground current, so she can sue the wind companies for stray current once the turbines go on line.  I suggested, too, that she and her neighbors get a complete physical and neurological exam before the turbines are fired up, again, to establish a medical baseline for future medical problems.  
I told her, finally, I had seen the amazing photograph of the Tug Hill turbines in the Watertown Daily Times last month.  “Yes,” she mused, “that was taken near my home.”  Then added, “It’s actually worse than the picture shows.”     
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/482</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind law plan leads to feud</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/24042</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Iberdrola Renewables Inc. and Environmentally Concerned Citizens Organization are trading jabs over the proposal to amend the town's zoning law for wind power facilities.

Iberdrola's attorney, Douglas H. Ward, of Young, Sommer, Ward, Ritzenberg, Baker &amp; Moore LLC, Albany, asked the town not to change the town's zoning law in a Sept. 21 letter.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Iberdrola Renewables Inc. and Environmentally Concerned Citizens Organization are trading jabs over the proposal to amend the town's zoning law for wind power facilities.

Iberdrola's attorney, Douglas H. Ward, of Young, Sommer, Ward, Ritzenberg, Baker &amp; Moore LLC, Albany, asked the town not to change the town's zoning law in a Sept. 21 letter.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/24042</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm plan scaled back a bit in Allegany </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/24040</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ During Monday's meeting for the Town of Allegany Planning Board, a gathering of 15 to 20 residents at the Allegany Senior Center heard a short presentation by Kevin Sheen, senior director of development for EverPower Renewables. The New York City-based company has been interested in constructing a wind-turbine farm in the Chipmonk area for the past couple of years and had initially proposed the construction of 32 wind turbines in the community. The new plan calls for the construction of 29 wind turbines.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>During Monday's meeting for the Town of Allegany Planning Board, a gathering of 15 to 20 residents at the Allegany Senior Center heard a short presentation by Kevin Sheen, senior director of development for EverPower Renewables. The New York City-based company has been interested in constructing a wind-turbine farm in the Chipmonk area for the past couple of years and had initially proposed the construction of 32 wind turbines in the community. The new plan calls for the construction of 29 wind turbines. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/24040</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Windmill proposal draws concern of Bayshore group </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23633</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Bayshore environmental group the Hazlet Area Quality of Life Alliance (HAQLA) is opposing a proposal that would place a 380-foot-tall windmill near a residential area along the coastline. 

HAQLA President John M. Curran III has written to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Monmouth County Freeholders in opposition to the wind turbine project proposed for Union Beach ...Curran calls for a countywide moratorium on wind towers/turbines &quot;until the county and towns establish effective, controlling ordinances and regulations&quot; governing renewable energy projects.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Bayshore environmental group the Hazlet Area Quality of Life Alliance (HAQLA) is opposing a proposal that would place a 380-foot-tall windmill near a residential area along the coastline. 

HAQLA President John M. Curran III has written to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Monmouth County Freeholders in opposition to the wind turbine project proposed for Union Beach ...Curran calls for a countywide moratorium on wind towers/turbines &quot;until the county and towns establish effective, controlling ordinances and regulations&quot; governing renewable energy projects. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23633</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind panel tackles health and safety</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23560</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The second set of recommendations from the town of Orleans Wind Committee includes requirements for fences around turbines, an earthquake preparedness manual and fire department training.

The recommendations were submitted to the Town Council at Thursday night's meeting. 

These recommendations addressed a wide range of health and safety issues unrelated to noise concerns, which were addressed in the first set of recommendations. The new issues also included stray voltage, well water and radon.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The second set of recommendations from the town of Orleans Wind Committee includes requirements for fences around turbines, an earthquake preparedness manual and fire department training.

The recommendations were submitted to the Town Council at Thursday night's meeting. 

These recommendations addressed a wide range of health and safety issues unrelated to noise concerns, which were addressed in the first set of recommendations. The new issues also included stray voltage, well water and radon.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23560</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Clayton accepts wind report</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22872</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Clayton Town Council agreed to keep the sound limitations and most of the setback recommendations from the Wind Committee and forward them to the town attorney to begin writing a new zoning law for wind power development.

The council, meeting Wednesday night, held voice votes on all 16 recommendations forwarded from the committee. The only point dropped by the council was a recommendation to site turbines so there would be no flicker effect falling at road intersections.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Clayton Town Council agreed to keep the sound limitations and most of the setback recommendations from the Wind Committee and forward them to the town attorney to begin writing a new zoning law for wind power development.

The council, meeting Wednesday night, held voice votes on all 16 recommendations forwarded from the committee. The only point dropped by the council was a recommendation to site turbines so there would be no flicker effect falling at road intersections.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22872</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Massa against current wind farm growth </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22682</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The 29th Congressional District is ground zero for wind farm development with more than 1,200 turbines ultimately planned for the region, according to U.S. Rep. Eric Massa, D-Corning. 

Massa was in town Monday night to discuss his opposition to the federal health reform act, during a 1.5-hour long town hall meeting, saying the act would impose a higher surcharge on New Yorkers and undermine Medicare. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The 29th Congressional District is ground zero for wind farm development with more than 1,200 turbines ultimately planned for the region, according to U.S. Rep. Eric Massa, D-Corning. 

Massa was in town Monday night to discuss his opposition to the federal health reform act, during a 1.5-hour long town hall meeting, saying the act would impose a higher surcharge on New Yorkers and undermine Medicare. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22682</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Woman protests turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22453</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A town resident is in a dispute with the town's zoning board over her neighbor's wind turbine, which she believes is too close to her property.

&quot;I want it down,&quot; said Mary C. Grogan, a seasonal town resident who lives next to Roger D. Alexander.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A town resident is in a dispute with the town's zoning board over her neighbor's wind turbine, which she believes is too close to her property.

&quot;I want it down,&quot; said Mary C. Grogan, a seasonal town resident who lives next to Roger D. Alexander.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22453</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine noise concerns</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22284</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Debate continues looming over a plan to put wind farms up in one Southern Tier town.Community members in Prattsburgh have one main concern when it comes to wind turbines going up in their neighborhood. 
That concern is the noise the turbines will make.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Debate continues looming over a plan to put wind farms up in one Southern Tier town.Community members in Prattsburgh have one main concern when it comes to wind turbines going up in their neighborhood. 
That concern is the noise the turbines will make.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22284</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Noise? What noise? </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22201</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:34:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The noise you can hear may be a problem for some individuals living near wind farms, according to Rochester- based acoustician Seth Waltz. 

But the noise you can't hear may be more troublesome and difficult to predict, Waltz, of avi designs, inc., told the Prattsburgh town board recently. 

&quot;There is no way to guarantee you won't have a problem,&quot; Waltz told board members. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The noise you can hear may be a problem for some individuals living near wind farms, according to Rochester- based acoustician Seth Waltz. 

But the noise you can't hear may be more troublesome and difficult to predict, Waltz, of avi designs, inc., told the Prattsburgh town board recently. 

&quot;There is no way to guarantee you won't have a problem,&quot; Waltz told board members. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22201</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm foes describe the noise</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22193</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cohocton Wind Farm leaseholder Hal E. Graham told north country residents Wednesday night about the noise and other effects the 50-turbine wind farm has had on his and his neighbors' lives.

Mr. Graham has one turbine on his property, 2,000 feet from his house. A neighbor has one 1,050 feet away from Mr. Graham's house. ...

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Cohocton Wind Farm leaseholder Hal E. Graham told north country residents Wednesday night about the noise and other effects the 50-turbine wind farm has had on his and his neighbors' lives.

Mr. Graham has one turbine on his property, 2,000 feet from his house. A neighbor has one 1,050 feet away from Mr. Graham's house. ...

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22193</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>New study disputes Cape noise levels</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21691</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The new study was done by Paul D. Schomer of Schomer &amp; Associates Inc., Champaign, Ill. Mr. Schomer is chairman of the International Organization for Standardization working group on environmental noise and chairman of the American National Standards committee on noise, among other leadership roles in noise measurement.

The finding contradicts the studies done by Hessler Associates Inc., Haymarket, Va., for the draft environmental impact statement of BP Alternative Energy's Cape Vincent Wind Farm and supplemental draft environmental impact statement of Acciona Energy North America's St. Lawrence Wind Farm.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The new study was done by Paul D. Schomer of Schomer &amp; Associates Inc., Champaign, Ill. Mr. Schomer is chairman of the International Organization for Standardization working group on environmental noise and chairman of the American National Standards committee on noise, among other leadership roles in noise measurement.

The finding contradicts the studies done by Hessler Associates Inc., Haymarket, Va., for the draft environmental impact statement of BP Alternative Energy's Cape Vincent Wind Farm and supplemental draft environmental impact statement of Acciona Energy North America's St. Lawrence Wind Farm.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21691</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ontario eyeing setbacks; Province's proposal based on distance, noise from turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21543</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Under the proposed regulations, noise levels also would need to fall to 40 decibels at receptors, such as dwellings or businesses.

The ministry said a turbine with a sound power level of 106 decibels would have to meet a setback of 950 meters, or about 3,100 feet, from the nearest house or business.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Under the proposed regulations, noise levels also would need to fall to 40 decibels at receptors, such as dwellings or businesses.

The ministry said a turbine with a sound power level of 106 decibels would have to meet a setback of 950 meters, or about 3,100 feet, from the nearest house or business.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21543</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine noise is rattling some residents in Michigan's Thumb</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21530</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The big blades have been welcomed by many, including Gov. Jennifer Granholm, as they've gone up in the farm fields of Huron County in recent years.

But a handful of people who live near some of the 46 turbines at a wind park in Bingham and Sheridan townships are now complaining about ongoing noise and rumble from the 300-foot-tall renewable energy generators.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The big blades have been welcomed by many, including Gov. Jennifer Granholm, as they've gone up in the farm fields of Huron County in recent years.

But a handful of people who live near some of the 46 turbines at a wind park in Bingham and Sheridan townships are now complaining about ongoing noise and rumble from the 300-foot-tall renewable energy generators.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21530</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
