    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c45+108?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Proposed wind farm intrusion to hikers?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21712</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A National Park Service official says a wind project proposed for a Skamania County site just outside the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area would intrude on the experiences of people traveling two national historic trails. 

Both the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the Oregon Pioneer Historic Trail pass through the Gorge, and both also pass within five miles of where turbines would rise at the Whistling Ridge Wind Project, said Rory D. Westberg, the Park Service's deputy regional director for planning and resource management.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A National Park Service official says a wind project proposed for a Skamania County site just outside the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area would intrude on the experiences of people traveling two national historic trails. 

Both the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the Oregon Pioneer Historic Trail pass through the Gorge, and both also pass within five miles of where turbines would rise at the Whistling Ridge Wind Project, said Rory D. Westberg, the Park Service's deputy regional director for planning and resource management.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21712</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Windmills in Ore. generating complaints about noise, possible health effects</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20641</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind turbines may supply power without pollution but they are also generating complaints about noise and even possible health effects for people who live near them.

Dan Williams says the 240-foot-tall turbines he can see from his hilltop home near Boardman in Eastern Oregon make so much noise they keep him awake at night.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind turbines may supply power without pollution but they are also generating complaints about noise and even possible health effects for people who live near them.

Dan Williams says the 240-foot-tall turbines he can see from his hilltop home near Boardman in Eastern Oregon make so much noise they keep him awake at night.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20641</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Proposed wind farm may be visible to Portland/Vancouver residents</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16108</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A proposed wind farm development Washington is creating some controversy.

While the plan is still in the very early stages, the designers envision placing wind turbines on a ridge near Larch Mountain, east of Battle Ground. ...A proposed wind farm development Washington is creating some controversy.

While the plan is still in the very early stages, the designers envision placing wind turbines on a ridge near Larch Mountain, east of Battle Ground.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A proposed wind farm development Washington is creating some controversy.

While the plan is still in the very early stages, the designers envision placing wind turbines on a ridge near Larch Mountain, east of Battle Ground. ...A proposed wind farm development Washington is creating some controversy.

While the plan is still in the very early stages, the designers envision placing wind turbines on a ridge near Larch Mountain, east of Battle Ground.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16108</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lumber company will apply to build Skamania wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12606</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ SDS Lumber Co. plans to apply for a permit before year's end to build a wind farm in Skamania County that would produce up to 70 megawatts of power. 

The project would be on a north-south ridge at elevations of 2,000 to 2,200 feet between Underwood Mountain and Whistling Ridge. The remote property lies east of the old mill town of Willard and about a mile north of the Columbia River Gorge ­National Scenic Area boundary. ...Dennis White, an environmental activist who lives in the Klickitat County community of Husum, said a regional discussion needs to take place about the cumulative effects of wind generation facilities in the Columbia Gorge. 

&quot;Wherever there's a BPA line, we're going to have these wind farms just outside the scenic area, up and down the gorge,&quot; White said.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>SDS Lumber Co. plans to apply for a permit before year's end to build a wind farm in Skamania County that would produce up to 70 megawatts of power. 

The project would be on a north-south ridge at elevations of 2,000 to 2,200 feet between Underwood Mountain and Whistling Ridge. The remote property lies east of the old mill town of Willard and about a mile north of the Columbia River Gorge ­National Scenic Area boundary. ...Dennis White, an environmental activist who lives in the Klickitat County community of Husum, said a regional discussion needs to take place about the cumulative effects of wind generation facilities in the Columbia Gorge. 

&quot;Wherever there's a BPA line, we're going to have these wind farms just outside the scenic area, up and down the gorge,&quot; White said.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12606</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Enxco seeks state wind farm OK</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6227</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ What EnXco Inc. in 2005 said it would do after Kittitas County rejected its wind farm north of Ellensburg it did Monday: the wind power development company filed a downsized wind farm proposal with the state in hopes to get better treatment and possible approval. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>What EnXco Inc. in 2005 said it would do after Kittitas County rejected its wind farm north of Ellensburg it did Monday: the wind power development company filed a downsized wind farm proposal with the state in hopes to get better treatment and possible approval. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6227</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Kittitas County Desert Claim Wind Power Project: Final EIS</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/223</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 3.8 Health &amp; Safety<p>
Affected Environment, Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures<p>

&quot;A number of comments submitted for the scoping process for the Desert Claim project EIS addressed 
concerns relating to potential health and safety issues. Specific topics indicated in these comments 
included certain possible hazards that are uniquely associated with wind turbines, such as blade throw and 
ice throw; health and safety issues associated with electrical and magnetic fields; more common hazards 
such as fire; and the incidence and impacts of shadow flicker, another phenomenon specific to wind 
turbines. Section 3.8 addresses these wide-ranging health and safety topics that have been identified as 
concerns for the environmental review. &quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>3.8 Health &amp; Safety
Affected Environment, Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

&quot;A number of comments submitted for the scoping process for the Desert Claim project EIS addressed 
concerns relating to potential health and safety issues. Specific topics indicated in these comments 
included certain possible hazards that are uniquely associated with wind turbines, such as blade throw and 
ice throw; health and safety issues associated with electrical and magnetic fields; more common hazards 
such as fire; and the incidence and impacts of shadow flicker, another phenomenon specific to wind 
turbines. Section 3.8 addresses these wide-ranging health and safety topics that have been identified as 
concerns for the environmental review. &quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/223</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Comments pertaining to the accuracy and completeness of the Kittitas Valley Wind farm Project DEIS</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/973</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This document [DEIS] has not provided any demonstrable public need for the insignificant amount of power this facility is capable of producing.  No valid, compelling local (or even statewide) economic reasons were offered to potentially offset the overwhelming negative impacts that will result if built.  

This DEIS is abundant in quantity, but extremely lacking in quality of scientific analysis and entirely deficient in analysis in certain areas.  Various mitigations offered are unacceptable or unworkable.

The following are areas of analysis that were either deficient or not performed at all:............
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This document [DEIS] has not provided any demonstrable public need for the insignificant amount of power this facility is capable of producing.  No valid, compelling local (or even statewide) economic reasons were offered to potentially offset the overwhelming negative impacts that will result if built.  

This DEIS is abundant in quantity, but extremely lacking in quality of scientific analysis and entirely deficient in analysis in certain areas.  Various mitigations offered are unacceptable or unworkable.

The following are areas of analysis that were either deficient or not performed at all:............
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/973</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Cap-and-trade schemes could hurt families and send jobs overseas</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22561</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cap-and-trade schemes could hurt families and send jobs overseas
The recently passed U.S. House bill to create a cap-and-trade system to tackle greenhouse-gas emissions threatens to hurt families and send jobs out of the country, argues Washington state Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy. In Washington state, the definition of 'green jobs' is ill defined. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Cap-and-trade schemes could hurt families and send jobs overseas
The recently passed U.S. House bill to create a cap-and-trade system to tackle greenhouse-gas emissions threatens to hurt families and send jobs out of the country, argues Washington state Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy. In Washington state, the definition of 'green jobs' is ill defined.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22561</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>In our view: Wind farm fracas</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14573</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ It would be a lot easier to choose up sides in the Columbia Gorge wind farm disputes if the capitalists wanted to dig open pit mines or put up oil derricks and extract resources from the land and then truck or pipe them away for decades to come, risking erosion, spills or explosions.

If that were the case, it would be easier to spew venom and spread fear about money-grubbing, land-raping operations planned along the border of the nation's first national scenic area. ...[T]he scenic area was created almost 22 years ago, and by now its protection ought to be a sacred duty and universal desire. We should be beyond the point of nibbling around the edges of the law and violating its spirit. Erecting giant towers, seven of which would be partly visible from parts of the gorge floor, seems a violation of that spirit.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>It would be a lot easier to choose up sides in the Columbia Gorge wind farm disputes if the capitalists wanted to dig open pit mines or put up oil derricks and extract resources from the land and then truck or pipe them away for decades to come, risking erosion, spills or explosions.

If that were the case, it would be easier to spew venom and spread fear about money-grubbing, land-raping operations planned along the border of the nation's first national scenic area. ...[T]he scenic area was created almost 22 years ago, and by now its protection ought to be a sacred duty and universal desire. We should be beyond the point of nibbling around the edges of the law and violating its spirit. Erecting giant towers, seven of which would be partly visible from parts of the gorge floor, seems a violation of that spirit.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14573</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Cons to wind power vastly overlooked</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12919</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:51:13 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Eight years ago, when my wife and I bought a 28-acre farm on the serene and beautiful Tucannon River near Dayton, we had no idea we were in the crosshairs of wind tower developers.

Later, despite being told we would not see the towers, we now look out our dining room window at 43 wind turbines. 

About 14 miles northeast of Dayton, where Highway 12 crosses the Tucannon River, you start to see the desecration that the wind projects have wrought. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Eight years ago, when my wife and I bought a 28-acre farm on the serene and beautiful Tucannon River near Dayton, we had no idea we were in the crosshairs of wind tower developers.

Later, despite being told we would not see the towers, we now look out our dining room window at 43 wind turbines. 

About 14 miles northeast of Dayton, where Highway 12 crosses the Tucannon River, you start to see the desecration that the wind projects have wrought. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12919</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Winds of change: Blowing some the wrong way</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11931</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ When Kittitas County approved the Wildhorse wind farm, Gregoire said the project would be the model for future projects because they have local government and citizen approval. She apparently changed models and lied to her constituents. Her decision places all counties' ability to make land-use decisions at risk. It reeks of totalitarianism, doesn't it? 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>When Kittitas County approved the Wildhorse wind farm, Gregoire said the project would be the model for future projects because they have local government and citizen approval. She apparently changed models and lied to her constituents. Her decision places all counties' ability to make land-use decisions at risk. It reeks of totalitarianism, doesn't it? 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11931</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>When local, state priorities collide, nobody is happy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11589</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ No one expects big infrastructure projects to drop in smoothly. From runways to sewer plants, these things often have negative spillover effects - traffic, noise or appearance. No one wants them. And while the nuisances may not be trivial, neither should they be determinative.

While the downside impacts tend to be extremely local, the benefits generally extend well beyond the region. Politically, that creates a difficult dynamic. Local politicians have little to gain by supporting projects opposed by their constituents. And the diffuse benefit rarely translates to the kind of political pressure generated by those who are affected adversely. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>No one expects big infrastructure projects to drop in smoothly. From runways to sewer plants, these things often have negative spillover effects - traffic, noise or appearance. No one wants them. And while the nuisances may not be trivial, neither should they be determinative.

While the downside impacts tend to be extremely local, the benefits generally extend well beyond the region. Politically, that creates a difficult dynamic. Local politicians have little to gain by supporting projects opposed by their constituents. And the diffuse benefit rarely translates to the kind of political pressure generated by those who are affected adversely. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11589</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Governor again fails to lead on important issue</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/10459</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Setback requirements are a protection of the public health, safety and individual property rights - not a yardstick of a project's economic success. The people who have the most experience with commercial wind power today are the Europeans. They are saying that a minimum of one mile from residences and any turbine should be imposed to protect the public.

But the bigger issue here is that our locally elected officials denied the project as designed and the governor believes she should override local land use authority based on how much more money Horizon can make.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Setback requirements are a protection of the public health, safety and individual property rights - not a yardstick of a project's economic success. The people who have the most experience with commercial wind power today are the Europeans. They are saying that a minimum of one mile from residences and any turbine should be imposed to protect the public.

But the bigger issue here is that our locally elected officials denied the project as designed and the governor believes she should override local land use authority based on how much more money Horizon can make. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/10459</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
