	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c43+75?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c43+75?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Citizens voice wind turbine concerns </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22532" title="Citizens voice wind turbine concerns "/> 
	<id>.22532</id> 
	<updated>2009-08-06T15:53:43Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-08-06T15:53:43Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville addressed the Village Board at its last meeting over their concerns about a wind turbine operating near their residences. 

Dave Gates, a member of Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville, said the group is upset over a 120-foot wind turbine located at Aldridge Electric, 844 E. Rockland Road, within 250-feet of their homes. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22532">
		<![CDATA[ Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville addressed the Village Board at its last meeting over their concerns about a wind turbine operating near their residences. 

Dave Gates, a member of Citizens for the Protection of Libertyville, said the group is upset over a 120-foot wind turbine located at Aldridge Electric, 844 E. Rockland Road, within 250-feet of their homes. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind power draws close look in Lake County</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22401" title="Wind power draws close look in Lake County"/> 
	<id>.22401</id> 
	<updated>2009-07-29T02:16:20Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-07-29T02:16:20Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Clean power is regarded as an exciting possibility, but few towns have ordinances on the books to regulate potential impacts, such as noise or flickering shadows.

To avoid pitfalls, several towns have imposed moratoriums and about a dozen have teamed with the county in a task force to study issues surrounding wind power.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22401">
		<![CDATA[ Clean power is regarded as an exciting possibility, but few towns have ordinances on the books to regulate potential impacts, such as noise or flickering shadows.

To avoid pitfalls, several towns have imposed moratoriums and about a dozen have teamed with the county in a task force to study issues surrounding wind power.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbine restraining order continued to July 14</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21836" title="Wind turbine restraining order continued to July 14"/> 
	<id>.21836</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-30T07:48:04Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-30T07:48:04Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Opponents of a wind turbine adjacent to a residential neighborhood won an extension of a temporary restraining order to keep the turbine turned off until July 14. ...&amp;quot;At that hearing we will be expected to present our evidence that we are being harmed by the noise of the turbine,&amp;quot; Gates said.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21836">
		<![CDATA[ Opponents of a wind turbine adjacent to a residential neighborhood won an extension of a temporary restraining order to keep the turbine turned off until July 14. ...&amp;quot;At that hearing we will be expected to present our evidence that we are being harmed by the noise of the turbine,&amp;quot; Gates said.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Judge silences wind turbine for second time</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21827" title="Judge silences wind turbine for second time"/> 
	<id>.21827</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-29T01:06:13Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-29T01:06:13Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Citizens for Protection of Libertyville scored another victory in court this morning. Judge Mitchell Hoffman issued a 2nd temporary restraining order against Aldridge Electric and DPR Investments LLC that shut down the turbine until July 14, 2009. 

Citizens for Protection of Libertyville, a group of neighbors who live in the surrounding area, are suing the Village of Libertyville, Aldridge Electric Inc. and DPR Investments LLC to force the permanent shut-down of the 146' turbine that was erected within a few hundred feet of their backyards. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21827">
		<![CDATA[ Citizens for Protection of Libertyville scored another victory in court this morning. Judge Mitchell Hoffman issued a 2nd temporary restraining order against Aldridge Electric and DPR Investments LLC that shut down the turbine until July 14, 2009. 

Citizens for Protection of Libertyville, a group of neighbors who live in the surrounding area, are suing the Village of Libertyville, Aldridge Electric Inc. and DPR Investments LLC to force the permanent shut-down of the 146' turbine that was erected within a few hundred feet of their backyards. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Neighbors say Libertyville company's wind turbine is a nuisance</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21648" title="Neighbors say Libertyville company's wind turbine is a nuisance"/> 
	<id>.21648</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-19T16:50:29Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-19T16:50:29Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The huge fan blade of the 126-foot wind turbine behind a Libertyville electrical contractor stands still now, a temporary concession to neighbors who find it a nuisance despite being touted as green energy. ...Shortly after the turbine was installed -- about 275 feet from one resident's backyard -- neighbors began complaining about noise, light from the turbine's reflective surface and the &amp;quot;flicker effect&amp;quot; created by the rotating fan blade.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21648">
		<![CDATA[ The huge fan blade of the 126-foot wind turbine behind a Libertyville electrical contractor stands still now, a temporary concession to neighbors who find it a nuisance despite being touted as green energy. ...Shortly after the turbine was installed -- about 275 feet from one resident's backyard -- neighbors began complaining about noise, light from the turbine's reflective surface and the &amp;quot;flicker effect&amp;quot; created by the rotating fan blade. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbine causes turbulence in Libertyville</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21578" title="Wind turbine causes turbulence in Libertyville"/> 
	<id>.21578</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-15T04:25:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-15T04:25:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The two sides are scheduled to meet Tuesday night at the company headquarters to discuss the company's 120-foot wind turbine. It was installed in April &amp;quot;to help Aldridge Electric offset their retail rate electricity,&amp;quot; according to a company news release. 

Since then, neighbors have complained of noise levels, light from the turbine's reflective surface, and the &amp;quot;flicker effect&amp;quot; created by the rotating fan blade.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21578">
		<![CDATA[ The two sides are scheduled to meet Tuesday night at the company headquarters to discuss the company's 120-foot wind turbine. It was installed in April &amp;quot;to help Aldridge Electric offset their retail rate electricity,&amp;quot; according to a company news release. 

Since then, neighbors have complained of noise levels, light from the turbine's reflective surface, and the &amp;quot;flicker effect&amp;quot; created by the rotating fan blade.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Order stops firm from running wind turbine</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21453" title="Order stops firm from running wind turbine"/> 
	<id>.21453</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-04T19:56:37Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-04T19:56:37Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Aldridge Electric's new wind turbine has stopped spinning, while the company attempts to strike a compromise over what neighbors are calling excessive noise.

On Tuesday, a group of nine residents who live near the Libertyville company, 844 E. Rockland Road, obtained a restraining order signed by a judge asking Aldridge to temporarily stop the turbine from spinning.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21453">
		<![CDATA[ Aldridge Electric's new wind turbine has stopped spinning, while the company attempts to strike a compromise over what neighbors are calling excessive noise.

On Tuesday, a group of nine residents who live near the Libertyville company, 844 E. Rockland Road, obtained a restraining order signed by a judge asking Aldridge to temporarily stop the turbine from spinning.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Libertyville officials probing noise complaint</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20964" title="Libertyville officials probing noise complaint"/> 
	<id>.20964</id> 
	<updated>2009-04-29T23:54:42Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-04-29T23:54:42Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Libertyville officials are investigating complaints about noise generated by a 120-foot-tall wind turbine at a local business.

The concerns arose just a few days before this Friday's planned ribbon-cutting ceremony for Aldridge Electric's turbine.

The device was installed earlier this month to generate cleaner energy for the business, an electrical contracting firm at 844 E. Rockland Road.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/20964">
		<![CDATA[ Libertyville officials are investigating complaints about noise generated by a 120-foot-tall wind turbine at a local business.

The concerns arose just a few days before this Friday's planned ribbon-cutting ceremony for Aldridge Electric's turbine.

The device was installed earlier this month to generate cleaner energy for the business, an electrical contracting firm at 844 E. Rockland Road.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm opponents air concerns; Experts say Rail Splitter project will create noise, affect property values</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15617" title="Wind farm opponents air concerns; Experts say Rail Splitter project will create noise, affect property values"/> 
	<id>.15617</id> 
	<updated>2008-05-02T13:55:00Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-05-02T13:55:00Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Tazewell County Zoning Board of Appeals has been holding public hearings since April 1, getting public input on the proposed Rail Splitter Wind Farm by Houston-based Horizon Wind Energy LLC. ...Spanos presented an acoustical engineer from Michigan who said the wind towers would create noise that could affect nearby residents and a real estate appraiser who said property values near the farm could drop.

&amp;quot;These wind farm turbines surround the properties,&amp;quot; said Michael McCann, a real estate appraiser from Chicago who said homes near the proposed farm could drop in value between 20 percent and 30 percent.



</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15617">
		<![CDATA[ The Tazewell County Zoning Board of Appeals has been holding public hearings since April 1, getting public input on the proposed Rail Splitter Wind Farm by Houston-based Horizon Wind Energy LLC. ...Spanos presented an acoustical engineer from Michigan who said the wind towers would create noise that could affect nearby residents and a real estate appraiser who said property values near the farm could drop.

&amp;quot;These wind farm turbines surround the properties,&amp;quot; said Michael McCann, a real estate appraiser from Chicago who said homes near the proposed farm could drop in value between 20 percent and 30 percent.



 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm plan takes some blows</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13884" title="Wind farm plan takes some blows"/> 
	<id>.13884</id> 
	<updated>2008-01-31T23:54:45Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-01-31T23:54:45Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The people affected by a future wind farm in Tazewell and Logan counties had a chance Tuesday night to meet employees of Horizon Wind Energy and ask tough questions about the giant turbines going up in their backyards.

The small, serious crowd of visitors to the Emden Community Center's basement brought to the meeting a mix of optimism and skepticism. 

Horizon Wind Energy, which already has a wind farm in McLean County, is planning to build another wind farm that will stretch from Emden in Logan County to Delavan in Tazewell County. 

&amp;quot;I don't like it. It ain't gonna be win-win for me,&amp;quot; said Gene Aper. 

Aper's home is going to be surrounded by wind turbines. Aper said he has talked to real estate agents who told him that his property value will go down 10 to 20 percent because of the nine wind turbines that will be visible from his front door. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13884">
		<![CDATA[ The people affected by a future wind farm in Tazewell and Logan counties had a chance Tuesday night to meet employees of Horizon Wind Energy and ask tough questions about the giant turbines going up in their backyards.

The small, serious crowd of visitors to the Emden Community Center's basement brought to the meeting a mix of optimism and skepticism. 

Horizon Wind Energy, which already has a wind farm in McLean County, is planning to build another wind farm that will stretch from Emden in Logan County to Delavan in Tazewell County. 

&amp;quot;I don't like it. It ain't gonna be win-win for me,&amp;quot; said Gene Aper. 

Aper's home is going to be surrounded by wind turbines. Aper said he has talked to real estate agents who told him that his property value will go down 10 to 20 percent because of the nine wind turbines that will be visible from his front door. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm hearings continue</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7521" title="Wind farm hearings continue"/> 
	<id>.7521</id> 
	<updated>2007-01-22T12:43:49Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-01-22T12:43:49Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The noise made by wind turbines is the equivalent of background noise in a conference room, an engineer testified Monday night at a meeting before the McLean County Zoning Board of Appeals. 

Timothy Casey of HDR Engineering, Minneapolis, Minn., continued testimony began at the last meeting on his company&#226;€™s noise analysis of the proposed wind turbines. His analysis was based on a wind speed of 22 mph &#226;€” the wind might blow more, but the turbines are adjusted so they don&#226;€™t spin faster if the wind speed is higher. 

He said because of a redesign of the configuration of the blades, they are quieter and don&#226;€™t &#226;€śthump&#226;€ť like older models do. Earlier, it was reported that the county requires 1,500-foot setbacks to distance turbines from homeowners. 

About 100 people attended one in a continuing series of four-hour meetings that continue this month. Invenergy Wind LLC of Chicago has proposed that 100 wind turbines be located on 12,200 acres in McLean and Woodford Counties. The White Oak Energy Center would be located west of Interstate 39 and north and east of Interstate 74. A total of 83 acres of farmland would ne taken out of production in the project, Invenergy has said. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7521">
		<![CDATA[ The noise made by wind turbines is the equivalent of background noise in a conference room, an engineer testified Monday night at a meeting before the McLean County Zoning Board of Appeals. 

Timothy Casey of HDR Engineering, Minneapolis, Minn., continued testimony began at the last meeting on his company&#226;€™s noise analysis of the proposed wind turbines. His analysis was based on a wind speed of 22 mph &#226;€” the wind might blow more, but the turbines are adjusted so they don&#226;€™t spin faster if the wind speed is higher. 

He said because of a redesign of the configuration of the blades, they are quieter and don&#226;€™t &#226;€śthump&#226;€ť like older models do. Earlier, it was reported that the county requires 1,500-foot setbacks to distance turbines from homeowners. 

About 100 people attended one in a continuing series of four-hour meetings that continue this month. Invenergy Wind LLC of Chicago has proposed that 100 wind turbines be located on 12,200 acres in McLean and Woodford Counties. The White Oak Energy Center would be located west of Interstate 39 and north and east of Interstate 74. A total of 83 acres of farmland would ne taken out of production in the project, Invenergy has said. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title> Critic calls turbines unfit neighbors; Noise levels, shadows cited as reasons to reject wind farm</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7425" title=" Critic calls turbines unfit neighbors; Noise levels, shadows cited as reasons to reject wind farm"/> 
	<id>.7425</id> 
	<updated>2007-01-18T12:40:38Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-01-18T12:40:38Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">An energy and environmental consultant hired by opponents of the proposed White Oak Wind Energy Center maintains Invenergy Wind LLC fails to meet several requirements for a special-use permit for the wind farm. 

Tom Hewson of Energy Ventures Analysis Inc., Arlington, Va., spoke to the McLean County Zoning Board of Appeals during a hearing Wednesday night. He said the proposed 100-turbine wind farm in McLean and Woodford counties would be a detriment to the public because of noise levels and visibility. 

Hewson said he did a &#226;€śsimple approach&#226;€ť simulation of one turbine to see how far a person had to be away from the turbine before it complied with Illinois&#226;€™ noise regulations. 

&#226;€śAt 750 feet away, it exceeded the range,&#226;€ť he said, noting that three property owners have asked for waivers to allow a turbine in about that range. 

Hewson said it wasn&#226;€™t until a person was 1,200 feet away from the turbine that the noise met Illinois&#226;€™ requirements. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7425">
		<![CDATA[ An energy and environmental consultant hired by opponents of the proposed White Oak Wind Energy Center maintains Invenergy Wind LLC fails to meet several requirements for a special-use permit for the wind farm. 

Tom Hewson of Energy Ventures Analysis Inc., Arlington, Va., spoke to the McLean County Zoning Board of Appeals during a hearing Wednesday night. He said the proposed 100-turbine wind farm in McLean and Woodford counties would be a detriment to the public because of noise levels and visibility. 

Hewson said he did a &#226;€śsimple approach&#226;€ť simulation of one turbine to see how far a person had to be away from the turbine before it complied with Illinois&#226;€™ noise regulations. 

&#226;€śAt 750 feet away, it exceeded the range,&#226;€ť he said, noting that three property owners have asked for waivers to allow a turbine in about that range. 

Hewson said it wasn&#226;€™t until a person was 1,200 feet away from the turbine that the noise met Illinois&#226;€™ requirements. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Law suit filed RE: business-scale turbine adjacent to residential properties</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22388" title="Law suit filed RE: business-scale turbine adjacent to residential properties"/> 
	<id>.22388</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-22T07:33:13Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-22T07:33:13Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">This suit was filed against the Village of Libertyville (IL) and DPR Investments LLC shortly after a business-scale wind turbine was erected and became operational within 600 feet of residential properties. The Entegrity 50 kilowatt, 120-foot turbine is owned by DPR Investments doing business as Aldridge Electric Company. Complaints of noise, shadow flicker and blade flicker were heard right after the turbine started turning. On July 24, 2009, the Court issued a compromise ruling stating that the turbine was affecting neighboring residents and restricted the turbine hours of operation to weekdays from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. (see: http://www.windaction.org/news/22373 )</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22388">
		<![CDATA[ This suit was filed against the Village of Libertyville (IL) and DPR Investments LLC shortly after a business-scale wind turbine was erected and became operational within 600 feet of residential properties. The Entegrity 50 kilowatt, 120-foot turbine is owned by DPR Investments doing business as Aldridge Electric Company. Complaints of noise, shadow flicker and blade flicker were heard right after the turbine started turning. On July 24, 2009, the Court issued a compromise ruling stating that the turbine was affecting neighboring residents and restricted the turbine hours of operation to weekdays from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. (see: http://www.windaction.org/news/22373 ) ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Richard James testimony re: Rail Splitter wind energy facility</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16711" title="Richard James testimony re: Rail Splitter wind energy facility"/> 
	<id>.16711</id> 
	<updated>2008-05-01T02:39:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-05-01T02:39:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Richard James is a noise control consultant and acoustical consultant with E-Coustic Solutions in Michigan. In his testimony before the Tazewell County Zoning Board of Appeals in IL, Mr. James addresses the noise study conducted by Horizon Wind for the Rail Splitter wind energy proposal. His testimony can be accessed in full by clicking on the link below and reading from page 22 of the .pdf file. Mr. James' testimony is informative and compelling.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16711">
		<![CDATA[ Richard James is a noise control consultant and acoustical consultant with E-Coustic Solutions in Michigan. In his testimony before the Tazewell County Zoning Board of Appeals in IL, Mr. James addresses the noise study conducted by Horizon Wind for the Rail Splitter wind energy proposal. His testimony can be accessed in full by clicking on the link below and reading from page 22 of the .pdf file. Mr. James' testimony is informative and compelling. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>County board dropped the ball</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9793" title="County board dropped the ball"/> 
	<id>.9793</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-26T11:10:16Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-26T11:10:16Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">As the debate over &amp;quot;Wind Farms&amp;quot; continues, and is now into court, I cannot help but wonder why it has progressed this far dividing neighbors, friends and families. I also reflect on how the whole ordeal, which has put much undue stress on all parties involved, could have been avoided had our County Board followed normal protocol regarding the granting of Special Use Permits. Last fall, when the hearing for Special Use Application was in front of the County Zoning Board of Appeals, there were several long nights of testimony from both sides. After all testimony was heard, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-1 to deny the application. At that point, in normal county procedure, the issue is over and the applicants must wait a year to apply again. However, in this case, our County Board leadership decided to be above the norm and overturn the Zoning Board of Appeal's recommendation forcing themselves and the county into imminent litigation.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9793">
		<![CDATA[ As the debate over &amp;quot;Wind Farms&amp;quot; continues, and is now into court, I cannot help but wonder why it has progressed this far dividing neighbors, friends and families. I also reflect on how the whole ordeal, which has put much undue stress on all parties involved, could have been avoided had our County Board followed normal protocol regarding the granting of Special Use Permits. Last fall, when the hearing for Special Use Application was in front of the County Zoning Board of Appeals, there were several long nights of testimony from both sides. After all testimony was heard, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-1 to deny the application. At that point, in normal county procedure, the issue is over and the applicants must wait a year to apply again. However, in this case, our County Board leadership decided to be above the norm and overturn the Zoning Board of Appeal's recommendation forcing themselves and the county into imminent litigation. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind Turbine Noise Levels-106dbs</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11808" title="Wind Turbine Noise Levels-106dbs"/> 
	<id>.11808</id> 
	<modified>2007-09-17T15:10:20Z</modified> 
	<issued>2007-09-17T15:10:20Z</issued> 
	<summary type="text/plain">
Video presentation addressing wind turbine noise levels for the Oak Prarie Power Plant proposed for Jo Daviess County near Nora, Illinois.Â 


Play time: 2 minutes 33 secondsÂ 

</summary>
	<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11808">
		<![CDATA[ <p>
Video presentation addressing wind turbine noise levels for the <span style="display: inline">Oak Prarie Power Plant proposed for Jo Daviess County near Nora, Illinois.Â </span>
</p>
<p>
Play time: 2 minutes 33 secondsÂ 
</p>
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Rene Taylor testimony before Union, WI planning commission</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16825" title="Rene Taylor testimony before Union, WI planning commission"/> 
	<id>.16825</id> 
	<modified>2008-05-29T00:02:35Z</modified> 
	<issued>2008-05-29T00:02:35Z</issued> 
	<summary type="text/plain">Horizon Wind Twin Grove wind energy facility, McLean County IL</summary>
	<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/16825">
		<![CDATA[ Horizon Wind Twin Grove wind energy facility, McLean County IL ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
