Category:
Erosion
HONOLULU – Kaheawa Wind Power LLC will be before the state Board of Land and Natural Resources at its meeting Friday on two issues: a habitat conservation plan and to learn what penalty it will be assessed for a conservation district violation in September.
Fighting to preserve 'untouched' Snowy Plains
December 8, 2005 by CAROLYN CANHAM in Cooma Monaro Express
December 8, 2005 by CAROLYN CANHAM in Cooma Monaro Express
The Jardine family has owned their property at Snowy Plain for generations.
David Jardine is the fifth generation of his family to own the land and his young grandson should be the seventh.
The Wind Farms Awareness Group before the meeting.
The encroachment of wind farms into Perthshire was again halted by councillors as another five proposed schemes were knocked back.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Noise|
Impact on Economy|
Zoning/Planning|
Europe|
UK]
Planning Commission Chairman Brian Keefe had his hands full keeping the overflow audience from drifting away from the siting issue. Many wanted to discuss questions of aesthetics or the merits of wind power. Keefe explained that there would be at least two or three meetings to discuss those other issues.
Also filed under [
Technology|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on People|
Safety|
Icing|
Zoning/Planning|
Vermont]
This document includes on-the-ground photos of the Allegheny Ridge wind farm in Pennsylvania which show the extent of land impacted by road development. The degree of clearing shown is typical for ridgeline wind energy development; however, as stated below, the clearing does not reflect pre-approval assertions made by the developer.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Pennsylvania]
Staff recommends WV PSC deny siting permit for Liberty Gap Wind Force
May 16, 2007
by West Virginia Public Service Commission
Excerpts below are from the May 16, 2007 Proposed Order of WV PSC denying Liberty Gap's application for CPCN (siting permit) for 50 wind turbine project atop Jack Mtn in Pendleton County:
Also filed under [
General|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Bats|
Impact on Views|
Noise|
Zoning/Planning|
West Virginia]
An indictment of the Scottish Executive and regulatory incompetence and indifference......‘One is left with a clear impression of inertia, bungling, duplicity, poor communication, procrastination, obfuscation and, quite frankly, shoddy and incorrect decision-taking both in temporal and technical terms'.
Lempster Wind Project: USFWS Letter to Community Energy
July 28, 2006
by Vernon B. Lang, Assistant Supervisor, New England Field Office
Starting with our first interagency meeting on April 8, 2005, we have generally discussed three broad categories of activities that pose a potential concern for fish and wildlife resources. These include the potential for bird and bat collisions with turbines, habitat fragmentation effects on wildlife and impacts to waters/wetlands. At the April 8, 2005 interagency meeting, we recommended that CEI collect three (3) years of radar data on spring and fall bird/bat migrations to document the spatial and temporal use of the airspace by these flying vertebrates. Three years of radar data should be sufficient to gather information on the spatial and temporal distribution of birds in the airspace, including the year-to-year variability in migration patterns at this site, and represent our normal request for these data at wind projects. We have consistently requested that this data be collected at our meetings and field visits and continue to make this request for radar information.
BBC Research & Consulting's 2005 report for the National Wind Coordinating Committee that studies 9 wind plant sitings in an effort to identify circumstances that distinguish welcomed projects from projects that were not accepted by communities.
Also filed under [
General|
Technology|
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Birds|
Impact on Bats|
Impact on Landscape|
Impact on Views|
Pollution|
Impact on Space|
Impact on People|
Noise|
Lighting|
Impact on Economy|
Property Values|
Tax Breaks & Subsidies|
Tourism|
Safety|
Icing|
Injury|
Structural Failure|
Energy Policy|
USA]
Despite its relatively small land mass, Scotland plays an important role in the UK in storing carbon on our land. We host 55 per cent of the UK's terrestrial carbon store.
The richest stores are our peat lands, poorly-drained soils ...However, the landscapes that best accumulate carbon - our wild and windy moorlands - also offer the best sites for energy generation from wind power: Scotland has 25 per cent of Europe's wind energy source, according to the Scottish Government.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
UK]
It's probably too much to expect, but, following the country's latest landslide or bog overflow, county councils and An Bord Pleanála should have more regard for people living in susceptible areas.
Despite the concerns of people in Derrybrien, Co Galway, regarding a wind farm in their area, planning permission was granted for it by An Bord Pleanála. Residents' worst fears came to pass when a landslide caused devastation in 2003. Fast forward to August, 2008, and a similar landslide involving 20 acres of bog in the Kielduff/Lyrecrompane area of Co Kerry. ...The Irish Peatland Conservation Council (IPCC), which aims to save Irish boglands, is calling on the Government to come up with a policy on the location of wind farms in sensitive habitats.
The quarry is one operation with active quarrying being done on approximately 30 acres - self-contained. Would Gamesa's Wind Project be self-contained - I don't think so! Where the quarry is one operation - Gamesa would have 30 operations - for starters! Gamesa's 30 operations would be located in the "heart" of the Piney Run Wilderness Area, atop the many ridges where below, the exceptional value streams flow.
The destruction from sight clearings, turbine installations, plus approximately 18 miles of interconnecting roads and transmission lines over the many ridge-tops would devastate not only the land area, but also the bird, fish, wildlife and eco-system of Shaffer Mountain.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Pennsylvania]
Does it make sense to trust a company that:
1) had no idea it was planning to build in a karst landscape until informed by interested private citizens;
2) now proposes inadequate safeguards to address the problem; and
3) continues to put out rank misinformation such as the weight of the turbines?
Is this a track record people feel comfortable with in a company that wants to make huge, irreversible changes in the local landscape?
| << Impact on Views | Pollution >> |
- Options :
- View Archives