    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c38+80?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Save Our Sound (SOS) Poster</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4166</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4166</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Save Our Sound (SOS) Poster</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4165</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:56:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4165</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>State draws zones for coast wind farms; Aims to protect sensitive areas of sea</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21850</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dozens of wind turbines could sprout within sight of the Massachusetts shoreline under a first-of-its-kind state blueprint with the promise of generating both electricity and controversy.
The draft plan, scheduled to be released today, would allow a series of small wind farms of up to 10 turbines each in coastal waters that stretch 3 miles from shore. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Dozens of wind turbines could sprout within sight of the Massachusetts shoreline under a first-of-its-kind state blueprint with the promise of generating both electricity and controversy.
The draft plan, scheduled to be released today, would allow a series of small wind farms of up to 10 turbines each in coastal waters that stretch 3 miles from shore. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21850</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbines are taking toll on bats </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20308</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The major ecological concern when five wind turbines were built here several years ago was whether they would kill migrating birds.
They have, including two ospreys and a peregrine falcon. But as it turns out, it isn't the death of birds that is drawing the most attention. The real casualty is bats.

The New Jersey Audubon Society is halfway through a three-year study on the impact of the turbines, and so far twice as many bats as birds have died.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The major ecological concern when five wind turbines were built here several years ago was whether they would kill migrating birds.
They have, including two ospreys and a peregrine falcon. But as it turns out, it isn't the death of birds that is drawing the most attention. The real casualty is bats.

The New Jersey Audubon Society is halfway through a three-year study on the impact of the turbines, and so far twice as many bats as birds have died.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20308</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>State shields 700 acres</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20233</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:09:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The state plans to protect over 700 acres of ridge line in the Hoosac Mountain range from any future development, including wind turbines, as the Berkshire Natural Resources Council continues to create a corridor of land connecting the Florida and Savoy Mountain state forests. 
Part of the plan calls for a major hiking trail for North Berkshire.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The state plans to protect over 700 acres of ridge line in the Hoosac Mountain range from any future development, including wind turbines, as the Berkshire Natural Resources Council continues to create a corridor of land connecting the Florida and Savoy Mountain state forests. 
Part of the plan calls for a major hiking trail for North Berkshire. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20233</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind power push whips up Mass. turbine debate</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19664</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Unlike other forms of green power such as solar panels or landfill methane gas, it's hard to hide a wind turbine, particularly in a state as small and densely populated as Massachusetts. ...That's creating a dilemma for conservationists and environmentalists who support renewable energy, but also want to preserve the state's wildlife population and scenic vistas. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Unlike other forms of green power such as solar panels or landfill methane gas, it's hard to hide a wind turbine, particularly in a state as small and densely populated as Massachusetts. ...That's creating a dilemma for conservationists and environmentalists who support renewable energy, but also want to preserve the state's wildlife population and scenic vistas. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19664</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>MMS gives Cape Wind favorable review except for birds, navigation and visual impacts</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19587</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Minerals Management Service's 800 page Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cape Wind was released on Friday and in a largely favorable review found nearly all impacts to be negligible or minor.
The few exceptions, where the 130 turbine wind farm would potentially or certainly have moderate to major impact were on birds, especially marine birds such as terns or sea ducks, on navigation and safety of recreational or commercial fishing boats, although those effects could be mitigated, and on visual resources of Nantucket Sound.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Minerals Management Service's 800 page Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cape Wind was released on Friday and in a largely favorable review found nearly all impacts to be negligible or minor.
The few exceptions, where the 130 turbine wind farm would potentially or certainly have moderate to major impact were on birds, especially marine birds such as terns or sea ducks, on navigation and safety of recreational or commercial fishing boats, although those effects could be mitigated, and on visual resources of Nantucket Sound.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19587</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Public help sought in tracking sick bats</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19560</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Massachusetts and Vermont wildlife officials are asking the public to help identify bats affected by a mysterious illness known as white nose syndrome.

This time of year, bats are normally hibernating in caves and in abandoned mines across the Northeast. But researchers are getting reports of bats weakly flying around in broad daylight or dying on decks and in backyards. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Massachusetts and Vermont wildlife officials are asking the public to help identify bats affected by a mysterious illness known as white nose syndrome.

This time of year, bats are normally hibernating in caves and in abandoned mines across the Northeast. But researchers are getting reports of bats weakly flying around in broad daylight or dying on decks and in backyards. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19560</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>First offshore wind farm is meeting stiff resistance</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19479</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The fate of what would be the nation's first offshore wind farm is calling attention to the political obstacles facing renewable power, despite President-elect Barack Obama's determination to greatly expand its use.
The project, called Cape Wind, is a Boston firm's plan to build 130 windmills across 25 square miles of federal waters off Cape Cod. ...A spokesman for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound says the group sees &quot;lots of room to protest&quot; the government review.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The fate of what would be the nation's first offshore wind farm is calling attention to the political obstacles facing renewable power, despite President-elect Barack Obama's determination to greatly expand its use.
The project, called Cape Wind, is a Boston firm's plan to build 130 windmills across 25 square miles of federal waters off Cape Cod. ...A spokesman for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound says the group sees &quot;lots of room to protest&quot; the government review.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19479</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>In Cape Wind storm of letters, two raise eyebrows</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15527</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ By the time federal regulators stopped accepting public comments about the proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm on Monday, two of the letters had already raised some eyebrows among the project's critics. That's because the two letters were signed by the same person, state Division of Marine Fisheries director Paul Diodati, but they struck noticeably different tones. ...Diodati's first letter [dated Feb. 20] spells out the loss of access that fishermen could face as well as concerns about rescue crews reaching a troubled boat in the area. 

But the second letter, dated March 7, tones down the rhetoric considerably, reducing the section that lists the potential impacts to fisheries to just a few sentences. The section also mentions a couple of possible benefits, such as certain species becoming attracted to the newly built tower foundations.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>By the time federal regulators stopped accepting public comments about the proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm on Monday, two of the letters had already raised some eyebrows among the project's critics. That's because the two letters were signed by the same person, state Division of Marine Fisheries director Paul Diodati, but they struck noticeably different tones. ...Diodati's first letter [dated Feb. 20] spells out the loss of access that fishermen could face as well as concerns about rescue crews reaching a troubled boat in the area. 

But the second letter, dated March 7, tones down the rhetoric considerably, reducing the section that lists the potential impacts to fisheries to just a few sentences. The section also mentions a couple of possible benefits, such as certain species becoming attracted to the newly built tower foundations.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15527</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Impacts on birds, boaters are cited in MMS report </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13852</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ But the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound cites more than a few environmental impacts in the DEIS that it believes the Minerals Management Service and the rest of the agencies reviewing the massive project need to pay closer attention to. Impacts on birds, scenic views, navigation, fish species, fishing and boating all received a moderate rating from the MMS. The Alliance also calls into question what it terms the excessive cost of Cape Wind's wind energy and air travel hazards over Nantucket Sound in proximity to the wind farm. 

Alliance President and CEO Glenn Wattley said the Alliance is working now to examine each impact that was given a moderate characterization by the MMS and figure out ways to address them. 

&quot;We've been retaining experts,&quot; he said. &quot;We have 40 experts on these topics, they are going over the topics [and] we're spending quite a bit of money putting together a professional response for the public comment period,&quot; he said.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>But the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound cites more than a few environmental impacts in the DEIS that it believes the Minerals Management Service and the rest of the agencies reviewing the massive project need to pay closer attention to. Impacts on birds, scenic views, navigation, fish species, fishing and boating all received a moderate rating from the MMS. The Alliance also calls into question what it terms the excessive cost of Cape Wind's wind energy and air travel hazards over Nantucket Sound in proximity to the wind farm. 

Alliance President and CEO Glenn Wattley said the Alliance is working now to examine each impact that was given a moderate characterization by the MMS and figure out ways to address them. 

&quot;We've been retaining experts,&quot; he said. &quot;We have 40 experts on these topics, they are going over the topics [and] we're spending quite a bit of money putting together a professional response for the public comment period,&quot; he said.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13852</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Sock 08/24/07</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11529</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:26:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Following a public hearing yesterday, the Cape Cod Commission voted to recommend a new adjudicatory process for Development of Regional Impact reviews of energy-related facilities under the jurisdiction of the state Energy Facilities Siting Board.

Commission chair Bob Jones of Sandwich advised with a smile that he could save some &quot;heartburn&quot; for audience members by announcing that language making the changes applicable to the Cape Wind project would not be included.

Actually, he probably just shifted the upset from backers of the project to its opponents. The latter had hoped Commission action would have established a process that would satisfy the EFSB's standards.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Following a public hearing yesterday, the Cape Cod Commission voted to recommend a new adjudicatory process for Development of Regional Impact reviews of energy-related facilities under the jurisdiction of the state Energy Facilities Siting Board.

Commission chair Bob Jones of Sandwich advised with a smile that he could save some &quot;heartburn&quot; for audience members by announcing that language making the changes applicable to the Cape Wind project would not be included.

Actually, he probably just shifted the upset from backers of the project to its opponents. The latter had hoped Commission action would have established a process that would satisfy the EFSB's standards. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11529</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Fishermen fight Cape Wind with new campaign</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11462</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The state's largest commercial fishing organization is publicly challenging assertions by the developer of the Cape Wind project that their offshore wind energy project will actually improve fishing in Nantucket Sound.

The Massachusetts Fishermen's Partnership (MFP), which is comprised of 18 commercial fishing organizations, decided to take its message to the airwaves in a TV commercial now appearing on several channels, said Executive Director David Bergeron, &quot;because the public needs to know that sustainable commercial fishing would be impacted and displaced&quot; by the Cape Wind development project on Horseshoe Shoal.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The state's largest commercial fishing organization is publicly challenging assertions by the developer of the Cape Wind project that their offshore wind energy project will actually improve fishing in Nantucket Sound.

The Massachusetts Fishermen's Partnership (MFP), which is comprised of 18 commercial fishing organizations, decided to take its message to the airwaves in a TV commercial now appearing on several channels, said Executive Director David Bergeron, &quot;because the public needs to know that sustainable commercial fishing would be impacted and displaced&quot; by the Cape Wind development project on Horseshoe Shoal. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11462</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>South Coast Wind developer cautiously optimistic after bird report</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/10638</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:59:03 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ NEW BEDFORD - The Boston developer who wants to build a 300-megawatt wind farm in Buzzards Bay called the results of preliminary bird studies &quot;encouraging&quot; but said it is too early to determine whether threats to endangered terns that nest and feed in the bay could kill the $750 million project.

&quot;I am fifty-percent comfortable,&quot; said Jay Cashman of Patriot Renewables, LLC., a renewable energy subsidiary of his construction company, Jay Cashman Inc.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>NEW BEDFORD - The Boston developer who wants to build a 300-megawatt wind farm in Buzzards Bay called the results of preliminary bird studies &quot;encouraging&quot; but said it is too early to determine whether threats to endangered terns that nest and feed in the bay could kill the $750 million project.

&quot;I am fifty-percent comfortable,&quot; said Jay Cashman of Patriot Renewables, LLC., a renewable energy subsidiary of his construction company, Jay Cashman Inc. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/10638</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm allies, foes laud Danish study</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6699</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Both supporters and opponents of the proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm are hailing the findings of recent research on the environmental impact of Danish offshore wind turbines. 

Supporters of Cape Wind Associates' plan to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound say the research released last week at an international conference supports their contention that wind farms pose little threat to wildlife. But Cape Wind foes say the Danish research highlights the need to carefully study the environmental impact of offshore wind turbines on a case-by-case basis. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Both supporters and opponents of the proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm are hailing the findings of recent research on the environmental impact of Danish offshore wind turbines. 

Supporters of Cape Wind Associates' plan to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound say the research released last week at an international conference supports their contention that wind farms pose little threat to wildlife. But Cape Wind foes say the Danish research highlights the need to carefully study the environmental impact of offshore wind turbines on a case-by-case basis. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6699</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind could shift in Buzzards Bay</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4575</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The phrase ''not permittable'' is typically the last thing a developer wants to hear. 

But that's exactly what the state environmental office has called Boston construction magnate Jay Cashman's proposal to build a 120-turbine offshore wind farm in three clustered Buzzards Bay sites. 

If Cashman wants to pursue his renewable energy plan, he ''proceeds at the risk of denial'' because the sites fall within the Cape and Islands Ocean Sanctuary, according to a certificate written by former Secretary of Environmental Affairs Stephen Pritchard that lays out the state's scope of review over the project. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The phrase ''not permittable'' is typically the last thing a developer wants to hear. 

But that's exactly what the state environmental office has called Boston construction magnate Jay Cashman's proposal to build a 120-turbine offshore wind farm in three clustered Buzzards Bay sites. 

If Cashman wants to pursue his renewable energy plan, he ''proceeds at the risk of denial'' because the sites fall within the Cape and Islands Ocean Sanctuary, according to a certificate written by former Secretary of Environmental Affairs Stephen Pritchard that lays out the state's scope of review over the project. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4575</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Report finds wind farm plan illegal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4535</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A Romney administration report has concluded that a proposal by a prominent Boston developer to build up to 120 wind turbines off Buzzards Bay would violate state law and could threaten an endangered species of bird.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A Romney administration report has concluded that a proposal by a prominent Boston developer to build up to 120 wind turbines off Buzzards Bay would violate state law and could threaten an endangered species of bird.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4535</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wing Barrier Potential bird hazards could kill wind project</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4077</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Boston construction giant Jay Cashman wants to build a massive wind farm in pristine Buzzards Bay, but says there is one potential obstacle. 

&quot;The one thing I am concerned about is birds,&quot; Mr. Cashman told a group in Fairhaven when he unveiled his $750 million renewable energy project earlier this month. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Boston construction giant Jay Cashman wants to build a massive wind farm in pristine Buzzards Bay, but says there is one potential obstacle. 

&quot;The one thing I am concerned about is birds,&quot; Mr. Cashman told a group in Fairhaven when he unveiled his $750 million renewable energy project earlier this month. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4077</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>MMA shuts turbine for avian study</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4072</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ BUZZARDS BAY — Researchers at Massachusetts Maritime Academy are studying how the school's new 241-foot wind turbine is affecting the flight patterns of birds that fly around the windy campus. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>BUZZARDS BAY — Researchers at Massachusetts Maritime Academy are studying how the school's new 241-foot wind turbine is affecting the flight patterns of birds that fly around the windy campus. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4072</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Cape Wind tracks birds</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/3347</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Before Cape Wind can build turbines on the sound, it first must prove to skeptics - and the state - that, among other things, the 417-foot-tall towers won't harm birds. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Before Cape Wind can build turbines on the sound, it first must prove to skeptics - and the state - that, among other things, the 417-foot-tall towers won't harm birds.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/3347</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
